Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Bihar SIR: What the Supreme Court’s interim order means for voter rights
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Bihar SIR: What the Supreme Court’s interim order means for voter rights
The Supreme Court, in an interim order on Thursday (August 14, 2025), directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to publish a booth-wise list of nearly 65 lakh electors who were excluded from the draft electoral roll released on August 1 as part of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in poll-bound Bihar.
A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi ordered that the list must specify the precise reasons for exclusion, such as death, migration, or duplicate registration.
The petitioners have argued that the poll body has failed to observe the basic principles of natural justice while carrying out the exercise. They have also questioned the “hasty” manner of its implementation.
What is the constitutionality of the SIR exercise, and does it risk disenfranchising voters? What are the implications of the interim order? To what extent does the order address the contentious debate over whether Aadhaar can serve as valid proof of identity and residence in the electoral process?
Guest: Shah Rukh Alam, advocate practising at the Supreme Court
Host: Aaratrika Bhaumik
Shot, produced, and edited by Jude Francis Weston
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
View all episodes
By The Hindu
4.5
3737 ratings
The Supreme Court, in an interim order on Thursday (August 14, 2025), directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to publish a booth-wise list of nearly 65 lakh electors who were excluded from the draft electoral roll released on August 1 as part of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in poll-bound Bihar.
A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi ordered that the list must specify the precise reasons for exclusion, such as death, migration, or duplicate registration.
The petitioners have argued that the poll body has failed to observe the basic principles of natural justice while carrying out the exercise. They have also questioned the “hasty” manner of its implementation.
What is the constitutionality of the SIR exercise, and does it risk disenfranchising voters? What are the implications of the interim order? To what extent does the order address the contentious debate over whether Aadhaar can serve as valid proof of identity and residence in the electoral process?
Guest: Shah Rukh Alam, advocate practising at the Supreme Court
Host: Aaratrika Bhaumik
Shot, produced, and edited by Jude Francis Weston
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
More shows like In Focus by The Hindu
View all
Cyrus Says
154 Listeners
Moneycontrol Podcast
11 Listeners
3 Things
56 Listeners
The Habit Coach with Ashdin Doctor
58 Listeners
ThePrint
88 Listeners
The Internet Said So
104 Listeners
Finshots Daily
43 Listeners
Woice with Warikoo Podcast
23 Listeners
दिनभर: पूरा दिन,पूरी ख़बर (Dinbhar)
12 Listeners
Top of the Morning
3 Listeners
The Morning Brief
12 Listeners
A Century Of Stories
9 Listeners
Daybreak
9 Listeners
ANI Podcast with Smita Prakash
95 Listeners
The Daily Brief
12 Listeners