
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Sarah and David discuss Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s opinion in Lindke v. Freed—released last week by the Supreme Court—and the test for state action on social media. Is there a constitutional right to commenting on state officials’ accounts?
The Agenda:
-Predicting SCOTUS votes for Net Choice
-Slime in the ice machine
-Justice Elena Kagan’s compelling reasoning for saying “and” means “or”
-Terrorism distortion and special needs exceptions to the Fourth Amendment
-The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is overwhelmed
-An emergency petition on the Texas A&M drag show case
-Don’t say 'Don’t Say Gay' when referring to this lawsuit
-Justice Stephen Breyer and choosing pragmatism and not textualism
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By The Dispatch4.8
38503,850 ratings
Sarah and David discuss Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s opinion in Lindke v. Freed—released last week by the Supreme Court—and the test for state action on social media. Is there a constitutional right to commenting on state officials’ accounts?
The Agenda:
-Predicting SCOTUS votes for Net Choice
-Slime in the ice machine
-Justice Elena Kagan’s compelling reasoning for saying “and” means “or”
-Terrorism distortion and special needs exceptions to the Fourth Amendment
-The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is overwhelmed
-An emergency petition on the Texas A&M drag show case
-Don’t say 'Don’t Say Gay' when referring to this lawsuit
-Justice Stephen Breyer and choosing pragmatism and not textualism
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

5,105 Listeners

1,855 Listeners

1,108 Listeners

4,443 Listeners

1,516 Listeners

5,172 Listeners

4,893 Listeners

6,602 Listeners

2,821 Listeners

3,355 Listeners

745 Listeners

1,937 Listeners

570 Listeners

127 Listeners

1,100 Listeners