
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Sarah and David discuss Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s opinion in Lindke v. Freed—released last week by the Supreme Court—and the test for state action on social media. Is there a constitutional right to commenting on state officials’ accounts?
The Agenda:
-Predicting SCOTUS votes for Net Choice
-Slime in the ice machine
-Justice Elena Kagan’s compelling reasoning for saying “and” means “or”
-Terrorism distortion and special needs exceptions to the Fourth Amendment
-The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is overwhelmed
-An emergency petition on the Texas A&M drag show case
-Don’t say 'Don’t Say Gay' when referring to this lawsuit
-Justice Stephen Breyer and choosing pragmatism and not textualism
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By The Dispatch4.8
37743,774 ratings
Sarah and David discuss Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s opinion in Lindke v. Freed—released last week by the Supreme Court—and the test for state action on social media. Is there a constitutional right to commenting on state officials’ accounts?
The Agenda:
-Predicting SCOTUS votes for Net Choice
-Slime in the ice machine
-Justice Elena Kagan’s compelling reasoning for saying “and” means “or”
-Terrorism distortion and special needs exceptions to the Fourth Amendment
-The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is overwhelmed
-An emergency petition on the Texas A&M drag show case
-Don’t say 'Don’t Say Gay' when referring to this lawsuit
-Justice Stephen Breyer and choosing pragmatism and not textualism
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

1,839 Listeners

1,120 Listeners

4,408 Listeners

5,165 Listeners

4,866 Listeners

6,548 Listeners

2,833 Listeners

3,317 Listeners

381 Listeners

738 Listeners

8,828 Listeners

1,927 Listeners

1,059 Listeners

125 Listeners

758 Listeners