
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Once a decade, American states have the chance to redraw boundaries for electoral districts. The temptation to create biased maps–called “gerrymanders”–has long been irresistible. Those drawn in the wake of the 2020 census are currently being finalised. How could redistricting be made more fair?
Harvard’s Nick Stephanopoulos assesses the latest maps. We explore a redistricting cycle that didn’t go as planned. And Davin Rosborough of the American Civil Liberties Union tells us about a gerrymandering battle in Alabama.
Jon Fasman presents with Charlotte Howard and Elliott Morris.
For full access to print, digital and audio editions as well as exclusive live events, subscribe to The Economist at economist.com/uspod
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By The Economist4.5
14081,408 ratings
Once a decade, American states have the chance to redraw boundaries for electoral districts. The temptation to create biased maps–called “gerrymanders”–has long been irresistible. Those drawn in the wake of the 2020 census are currently being finalised. How could redistricting be made more fair?
Harvard’s Nick Stephanopoulos assesses the latest maps. We explore a redistricting cycle that didn’t go as planned. And Davin Rosborough of the American Civil Liberties Union tells us about a gerrymandering battle in Alabama.
Jon Fasman presents with Charlotte Howard and Elliott Morris.
For full access to print, digital and audio editions as well as exclusive live events, subscribe to The Economist at economist.com/uspod
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

4,190 Listeners

920 Listeners

523 Listeners

606 Listeners

580 Listeners

365 Listeners

91 Listeners

711 Listeners

107 Listeners

224 Listeners

2,547 Listeners

46 Listeners

1,081 Listeners

140 Listeners

115 Listeners

102 Listeners

38 Listeners

446 Listeners

893 Listeners

366 Listeners

497 Listeners

78 Listeners

139 Listeners

72 Listeners

100 Listeners

246 Listeners