
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Microsoft$MSFT ( ▲ 0.19% ) is a tech company most of us take for granted, but it’s been a strong and steady market performer, up over 135% in the past five years, and up 20% this year alone. With big tech now pouring hundreds of billions into AI, BBTW editor Peter Green spoke with Motley Fool Asset Management’s chief investment strategist, Bill Mann, about why we still tend to gloss over the country’s most diversified mega-cap tech firm, and why that’s always a mistake.
Peter Green: What’s driving Microsoft these days?Bill Mann:If you look at what Microsoft has done for the last 40 years, it has been one of the 10 largest companies in the U.S., which is an extraordinary streak, and it speaks to a longevity and a creativity that goes on and on. Still, from time to time, we make the mistake of underestimating Microsoft. When they came up with “FANG” (an acronym for Facebook$META ( ▼ 1.49% ) , Amazon$AMZN ( ▼ 0.93% ) , Netflix$NFLX ( ▼ 0.78% ) and Google$GOOGL ( ▲ 0.21% ) ), Microsoft wasn’t even included, but it is the most internally diverse of the mega-cap tech companies. In an era of incredible economic restructuring in this country around AI and cloud computing, it’s become the safest of the tech plays. Even in an era like this, you can trust Microsoft to have figured out where opportunities lie across the tech stack.
So where do those opportunities lie?Their cloud computing business, Azure, has been incredible. It’sgrowing at 34%. That’s been a huge new business for them. In enterprise security, there are three main players, Microsoft, Sentinel One$SENTINELONE ( 0.0% ) , and CrowdStrike$CRWD ( ▼ 1.01% ) , controlling most of the market. That’s a $30 billion business for them, and it’s something that almost feels like it’s side-of-desk, but it’s a huge area of opportunity and advantage for them. And there’s Microsoft Co-Pilot, an AI-powered companion designed to assist with various tasks, at $30 a seat per month, $20 billion in additional revenue two years from now.
What are the threats to any of these existing businesses?The first is that they’ve been generally pretty cooperative with OpenAI, but, as we saw last week, OpenAI is contemplating a bid for Chrome. For OpenAI to make a move to make itself independent, that can be harmful to Azure because they’re pretty well integrated. But I tend to think of Microsoft as being the guy behind the guy. So it’s at a lower risk of being disintermediated, even from some of its hyper-scaling peers. The other big risk to Microsoft? They’re spending $30 billion in CapEx this quarter, and there are structural reasons why the demand for AI and cloud could be slowed down, like the power grid can’t handle all this demand. I don’t care how big you are; if you strand $30 billion in capital expenditures, that’s meaningful. I see plenty of speed bumps for Microsoft and for the entire sector, but given the internal diversity that they have, it is still my favorite bet in the sector.
Is the demand really there for all this AI work?The demand will be there, it’s almost a sure thing because it’s happened in every other revolution in the economy, going back to the railroads, that a lot of the capital expenditures are going to be stranded. They’re not all going to win, but none of the hyperscalers want to be left behind.
How is Microsoft dealing with the AI energy bottleneck?They say they have a plan and you would have to assume that all of these companies have recognized the risk, because they’ve already had difficulty sourcing energy. But that place in line is much more important than what the demand for the services looks like in 2028.
So is Microsoft a sell, a hold, a buy?To me, it’s the highest quality investment opportunity in the space.
#NotFinancialAdvice
This interview has been edited and condensed for brevity and clarity.
—Peter S. Green
Watch Big Business This Week on Cheddar—and YouTube!Big Businesses mentioned this week$MSFT ( ▲ 0.19% ) $META ( ▼ 1.49% ) $AMZN ( ▼ 0.93% ) $NFLX ( ▼ 0.78% ) $GOOGL ( ▲ 0.21% ) $SENTINELONE ( 0.0% ) $CRWD ( ▼ 1.01% ) $INTC ( ▼ 0.87% ) $SFTBY ( ▼ 0.33% ) $PLTR ( ▲ 0.13% ) $NVDA ( ▼ 0.31% ) $ORCL ( ▼ 0.54% ) $AMD ( ▼ 0.8% ) $ARM ( ▲ 1.21% ) $TGT ( ▼ 2.54% ) $WMT ( ▼ 4.91% ) $AMZN ( ▼ 0.93% ) $MCD ( ▲ 0.09% ) $TSLA ( ▼ 1.08% ) $CLRS ( 0.0% ) $PMRTY ( ▼ 0.01% ) $SHCO ( ▲ 0.06% ) $CCW ( 0.0% ) $NXST ( ▲ 0.72% )
Get Big Business This Week in your inbox every week—and read it before everybody else! Sign up today.
The usual suspectsYou’re clearly into smart people talking about even smarter things. Lucky for you, that’s literally our whole deal atCheddar. We interview the brightest minds in business, finance, and tech. If you’d like more in-depth analysis from interesting people, lcheck out ourwhere to watchpage and turn us on 24/7! Your wallet will thank you and so, more importantly, will your mind. But also your wallet. Remember that.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook late Wednesday said she wouldn’t leave her post after Trump on social media called on her to resign over an accusation from one his officials that she committed mortgage fraud.
“I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet,” Cook said in a statement issued by the Fed.
Bill Pulte, the head of the agency that regulates mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and a Trump appointee, alleged on the X social media platform early Wednesday that Cook had claimed two primary residences -- in Ann Arbor, Michigan and Atlanta -- in 2021 to get better mortgage terms. Mortgage rates are often higher on second homes or those purchased to rent.
Trump followed up Pulte’s accusation by calling on Cook to resign, in the latest effort by the administration to exert greater control over one of the few remaining independent agencies in Washington. Trump has repeatedly attacked the Fed’s chair, Jerome Powell, for not cutting its short-term interest rate, and even threatened to fire him.
If Cook is forced off the Fed’s governing board, it would provide Trump an opportunity to appoint a loyalist. Trump has said he would only appoint officials who would support cutting rates.
Pulte urged the Justice Department to investigate Cook, who was appointed to the Fed’s governing board by former president Joe Biden in 2022. She was reappointed the following year to a term that lasts until 2038, the longest remaining term among the seven governors.
Cook also said, “I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts.”
Pulte, in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, said that on June 18, 2021, Cook purchased a home in Ann Arbor and then two weeks later bought a condo in Atlanta. Before joining the Fed, Cook taught at Michigan State University. Pulte also charged that Cook has listed her condo in Atlanta for rent.
A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment.
Just last month, Trump blasted Powell for the ballooning cost of the renovation of two of the Fed’s headquarters buildings, even suggesting that the run-up in costs could constitute a firing offense. He backed off his threats to fire Powell after receiving a tour of the project.
Pulte also suggested that Cook’s alleged actions could constitute a fireable offense. Fed officials are protected by law from being removed by a president, except “for cause,” which is generally seen as some kind of malfeasance or dereliction of duty.
Either way, if Trump seeks to fire Cook, it could lead to a court battle over a president’s power to remove Fed governors.
Senate Democrats, including New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, expressed support for Cook and slammed Trump’s actions.
“Trump is a liar. Lisa Cook—stand tough and don’t let Trump intimidate you," Schumer wrote in a post on social media platform X.
Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren said in a statement that Trump “has been scrambling for a pretext to intimidate or fire Chair Powell and members of the Federal Reserve Board while blaming anyone but himself for how his failed economic policies are hurting Americans.”
Trump will be able to replace Chair Jerome Powell in May 2026, when Powell’s term expires. Yet 12 members of the Fed’s interest-rate setting committee have a vote on whether to raise or lower interest rates, so even replacing the Chair doesn’t guarantee that Fed policy will shift the way Trump wants.
But the more members of the Fed’s governing board that Trump can appoint, the more control he will be able to assert over the Fed, which has long been considered independent from day-to-day politics.
All seven members of the Fed’s governing board are able to vote on rate decisions. The other five voters include the president of the Fed’s New York branch and a rotating group of four of the presidents of the Fed’s other 11 regional branches.
Trump appointed two members of the Fed’s board in his first term, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman. Both dissented July 30 from the central bank’s decision to keep its rate unchanged, in favor of a rate cut.
Another Fed governor, Adriana Kugler, stepped down unexpectedly Aug. 1, and Trump has nominated one of his economic advisers, Stephen Miran, to fill out the remainder of her term until January.
If Trump is able to replace Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed’s board, as well as Kugler, that would give him a clear majority on the board of governors. If Powell leaves the board when his term as chair ends next May, then Trump will be able to fill a fifth spot. However, Powell could stay on the board until early 2028 after finishing his term as chair.
The presidents of the regional Federal Reserve banks are selected by the boards of directors of those banks, but are subject to the approval of the Fed’s board of governors. The terms of all 12 of the regional Fed presidents end next February.
Trump has for months demanded that the Federal Reserve reduce the short-term interest rate it controls, which currently stands at about 4.3%. He has also repeatedly insulted Powell, who has said that the Fed would like to see more evidence of how the economy evolves in response to Trump’s sweeping tariffs before making any moves. Powell has also said the duties threaten to raise inflation and slow growth.
Trump says that a lower rate would reduce the government’s borrowing costs on $37 trillion in debt and boost the housing market by reducing mortgage rates. Yet mortgage borrowing costs and other interest rates, including many of the ones the government pays, do not always follow the Fed’s rate decisions.
The Trump administration has made similar claims of mortgage fraud against Democrats that Trump has attacked, including California Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
From the publisher's feed

14,512 Listeners

1,213 Listeners

111,866 Listeners

56,429 Listeners

1,361 Listeners

1,868 Listeners

6,438 Listeners

2,118 Listeners

3,619 Listeners

6,447 Listeners

6,581 Listeners

574 Listeners

6,374 Listeners

1,527 Listeners

41,382 Listeners