New study links Christian nationalism to increased prejudice against atheists, Psy Post, by Eric W. Dolan, on December 3, 2023, https://www.psypost.org/2023/12/new-study-links-christian-nationalism-to-increased-prejudice-against-atheists-214829The Non-Prophets, Episode 22.50.4 featuring Scott Dickie, Eli, Phoebe Rose and Infidel64Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Christian Nationalists really dislike atheists

And we are The Non-Prophets!... airing on the first and third Sunday of every month, starting at 3:00 PM Central (01:30-03:00 UTC) on our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/thenonprophetsaca. The Non-Prophets focuses on atheism and the separation of church and state.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

News

Harrison Butker speech: The biggest mistake he made in his controversial commencement commentsCNN, By AJ Willingham, on May 17, 2024https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/16/sport/harrison-butker-commencement-speech-analysis-cec/index.htmlIn this episode we confront the unsettling reality of misogyny through the lens of one individual: Harrison Butker. Amidst societal shifts and growing awareness of gender issues, Butker's words emerge as a stark reminder of the pervasive nature of sexism and its impact on discourse.With each utterance, Butker reveals the depths of his misogyny, weaving a tapestry of gendered insults and demeaning remarks. His rhetoric serves as a damning indictment of toxic masculinity, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and reinforcing oppressive power dynamics.As we dissect Butker's misogynistic musings, we're confronted with the ugly truth of gender-based discrimination. Each statement becomes a painful reminder of the systemic barriers faced by women in society, from the workplace to the home.Butker's words not only reflect his own warped worldview but also serve as a call to action for broader societal change. Through his verbal assaults, we're reminded of the urgent need to dismantle patriarchal structures and create a more equitable world for all.As the episode draws to a close, we're left with a sense of outrage and determination, a reminder that misogyny has no place in our discourse or our society. And as we reflect on Butker's hateful rhetoric, we're galvanized to stand up against sexism in all its forms, ensuring that voices of hate are drowned out by the chorus of progress and equality.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.22.3 featuring Kelley Laughlin, Eli Slack, Jimmy Jr. and Cynthia McDonaldBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Harrison Butker Shanks his Commencement Speech

MN lawmaker: Public schools engage in 'censorship' by not teaching CreationismThe Friendly Atheist, By Hemant Mehta, on May 07, 2024https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/mn-lawmaker-public-schools-engageIn this episode  the hosts discuss a heated debate over an education bill in Minnesota, introduced by Republican State Senator Glenn Grunhagen. The bill, known as SF 3567, aims to prevent book banning by school districts. However, Grunhagen opposes a section of the bill that would allow parents and librarians to restrict material for students, provided the restrictions are not based on viewpoint or content.Grunhagen, a known climate change denier and Christian nationalist, argues that liberals support censorship when it suits their agenda. He draws a parallel between this bill and the exclusion of creationism from science classes, framing both as censorship. Grunhagen's background and previous attempts to introduce creationist views into school curricula are discussed, highlighting his persistent efforts to infuse his religious beliefs into public education.Cynthia critiques Grunhagen's flawed reasoning, pointing out his reliance on outdated creationist arguments like the cosmological argument and the watchmaker analogy. She shares a personal anecdote about her past belief in similar reasoning and underscores the importance of teaching evolution and critical thinking skills in schools.The conversation shifts to the bill's implications. While some see it as a necessary measure to protect intellectual freedom, others worry about its potential to limit children's access to diverse information. The hosts agree that critical thinking and access to information are crucial for students' development. They debate whether decisions about educational content should rest with individuals or committees, emphasizing the need for oversight to prevent biased decision-making.Jimmy expands on the broader political context, noting the rise of aggressive tactics and mob-like behavior among certain conservative factions. He underscores the importance of maintaining a separation between religion and government, lamenting the influence of figures like David Barton, who distort historical and scientific facts to fit their agendas.Cynthia echoes these concerns, expressing hope that rationality will prevail but acknowledging the persistent push from certain groups to undermine scientific education. She highlights the broader societal implications of this trend, warning that replacing factual education with religious ideology could hinder future generations' ability to navigate an increasingly complex world.The episode wraps up with a reflection on the importance of qualified oversight in educational decisions, ensuring that children's access to knowledge is not unduly restricted by individual biases. The hosts agree that while the bill has its flaws, its intent to safeguard intellectual freedom is a step in the right direction.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.22.2 featuring Kelley Laughlin, Eli Slack, Jimmy Jr. and Cynthia McDonaldBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Lawmaker Wants to Teach Myths in Science Class

A GOP school board member tried to ban a student's art for being 'offensive' to ChristiansThe Advocate Mag, By Ryan Adamczeski, on May 9, 2024https://www.advocate.com/news/virginia-augusta-school-board-gay-artThe panel delved into the story of Abby Driscoll, a queer student at Fort Defiance High School in Virginia, whose artwork sparked significant controversy. Driscoll's piece depicted praying hands holding a red rosary, surrounded by a rainbow-colored Bible with the caption, "God loves you but not enough to save you." This provocative artwork was an expression of her experience navigating her identity in a predominantly Christian environment.The artwork drew the ire of Tim Simmons, a conservative school board member, who found it offensive to his faith. Simmons went to great lengths to have the artwork censored, even calling for an emergency school board meeting. Despite being mocked by constituents and lacking support from his peers on the school board, Simmons continued his efforts, highlighting a persistent tension between personal beliefs and public education.The episode also touched on broader themes of artistic freedom and the role of art in challenging societal norms. Eli, one of the panelists, argued that the true offense lies in the discrimination faced by LGBTQ+ individuals, not in the artwork itself. He emphasized the importance of confronting uncomfortable truths to foster personal and societal growth.Jimmy pointed out that Simmons' lack of support from other school board members and his subsequent appeal to social media were indicative of a broader issue. He criticized Simmons for prioritizing personal offense over the educational needs and emotional well-being of students. Jimmy further discussed the inherent value of art in provoking thought and encouraging dialogue, suggesting that the controversy itself underscores the power and importance of Driscoll's work.Cynthia elaborated on the implications of censorship in schools, noting a troubling trend where parental and ideological pressures increasingly dictate educational content. She highlighted the importance of maintaining a clear separation between church and state in public education, ensuring that curricula are shaped by educational rather than religious or personal beliefs.The panel unanimously agreed that the function of art, especially in an educational context, is to provoke thought, inspire conversation, and reflect diverse experiences. They applauded Abby Driscoll for her courage in expressing her truth through art, despite the backlash. The discussion underscored the vital role of artistic expression in addressing and challenging societal injustices, particularly for marginalized communities.In summary, Abby Driscoll's artwork and the subsequent controversy with Tim Simmons serve as a poignant reminder of the ongoing struggle for LGBTQ+ acceptance and the critical importance of protecting artistic freedom in educational environments. The Non-Prophets panel highlighted how art can serve as a powerful catalyst for social change, fostering essential conversations about identity, faith, and human rights.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.22.1 featuring Kelley Laughlin, Eli Slack, Jimmy Jr. and Cynthia McDonaldBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

First Books, Now Art: GOP's New School Ban

What do assisted dying, assisted suicide and euthanasia mean and what is the law?BBC.com, By BBC News, on March 24, 2024https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-47158287Assisted dying, a deeply sensitive and contentious topic, has been gaining attention as several regions in the UK consider legal changes that would allow terminally ill individuals to end their lives with medical assistance. This issue is complex, varying significantly across different regions. Cindy, hailing from a country where euthanasia is legal, explores the experiences of other nations that have legalized such practices, aiming to glean lessons applicable to the US context.The terminology in this discussion is crucial. Words like "assisted dying," "assisted suicide," and "euthanasia" must be clearly defined to ensure meaningful debate and legislative clarity. As Cindy notes, living in a country with legal euthanasia offers unique insights. In Belgium, where euthanasia has been legal since 2003, strict safeguards are in place. The process requires convincing two independent doctors, with at least a month between the request and the procedure. This thorough approach has led to a societal acceptance and normalization of the practice, demonstrating that well-structured laws can provide compassionate options without leading to misuse.One significant point raised is the importance of bodily autonomy and the right to choose how one’s life ends. This choice is often about regaining a sense of control lost to terminal illness. It allows individuals to avoid prolonged suffering and make decisions surrounded by loved ones, rather than in isolation. This aspect of control and dignity is a cornerstone of the argument for legalizing assisted dying.However, there are valid concerns about the impact of such legislation on vulnerable populations, such as those with disabilities or mental illness. Infidel highlights the need for stringent safeguards to ensure that individuals are making informed, voluntary decisions. Research indicates that some individuals requesting assisted death may have psychiatric symptoms affecting their competence, underscoring the necessity for thorough evaluations and oversight beyond just a primary physician’s approval.Kelley emphasizes the importance of public discussions about assisted dying to alleviate the guilt and shock often experienced by those left behind. Open conversations can help loved ones understand and accept the decisions of those suffering, reducing the emotional burden and promoting a more compassionate societal view on the matter.Reflecting on personal experiences with terminally ill loved ones, Cindy and Kelley discuss the profound impact of suffering and the desire for a dignified end. They argue that stigma around assisted dying prevents necessary conversations and compassionate solutions. In countries like Belgium, where euthanasia is integrated into healthcare, there is less resistance and more acceptance of this practice as a compassionate choice.As the debate continues in the US, it is evident that any potential legislation would need to be carefully crafted with robust safeguards to protect vulnerable individuals while respecting personal autonomy. The goal would be to provide a compassionate, dignified option for those facing unbearable suffering, similar to the successful model seen in Belgium.Ultimately, while the US may not be fully ready for widespread acceptance of assisted dying, it is a conversation that needs to be had. Public understanding, legislative clarity, and compassionate discourse are essential steps toward addressing the ethical, emotional, and practical dimensions of this complex issue.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.21.4 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Infidel64, Cindy Plaza and Kelley LaughlinBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Assisted Dying: What does it mean and what is the Law?

Texas superintendent resigns after trans student’s removal from ‘Oklahoma!’NBC News, By Jo Yurcaba, on May 2, 2024https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/texas-superintendent-resigns-trans-students-removal-oklahoma-rcna150479In a significant turn of events at the Sherman Independent School District in Texas, Superintendent Tyson Bennett resigned following a highly controversial incident involving the removal and subsequent reinstatement of a transgender student, Max High Tower, from a high school production of the musical "Oklahoma!". This decision came after the controversy garnered national attention and sparked widespread outrage.The school board convened in a closed session to address the situation, ultimately accepting Bennett's resignation and appointing Thomas O'Neal as the interim superintendent. The controversy began in March when Max High Tower, a transgender student, was initially barred from playing a role that did not align with his sex assigned at birth. This decision led to a significant backlash from the community and beyond, prompting the school to reverse its stance and reinstate the original cast and script.Max's father, Philip High Tower, publicly praised the school board's decision to advocate for all students, expressing hope that this incident would signal a move towards greater inclusivity and a stand against discrimination. The entire episode has highlighted the ongoing struggles and debates surrounding the rights and inclusion of transgender individuals in educational and extracurricular settings.This story, reported by Joe Yuhakaba for NBC News on May 2, 2024, underscores the broader national dialogue on transgender rights and the challenges faced by educational institutions in navigating these complex and often polarizing issues.Cindy expressed skepticism about the long-term impact of Bennett's resignation on the district's handling of transgender issues. She pointed out the broader, hostile political climate towards transgender people, suggesting that one resignation might not lead to substantial change.Kelley, speculated about the dynamics behind Bennett's resignation. He raised questions about whether Bennett was directly responsible for the initial decision or if he was merely a scapegoat. Kelley suggested that there might have been a backroom deal allowing Bennett to resign without being fired to avoid a more significant controversy. He emphasized the importance of understanding the decision-making process and the role of other school officials in the incident.The discussion highlighted how public pressure and media attention can influence institutional decisions. The panelists drew parallels to historical civil rights movements, where media exposure played a crucial role in driving societal change. They discussed the necessity of education and critical thinking in combating misinformation and fostering inclusivity.Ultimately, the incident at Sherman Independent School District serves as a microcosm of the larger debates over transgender rights in America. It demonstrates the power of public opinion and media scrutiny in holding institutions accountable and the ongoing need for education and advocacy to combat discrimination and promote inclusivity.The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.21.3 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Infidel64, Cindy Plaza and Kelley LaughlinBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Christian Nationalists really dislike atheists

Download our free app to listen on your phone