Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Christians Deny Faith, Rebranding the Doctrine
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Christians Deny Faith, Rebranding the Doctrine
Stand to Reason, By Greg Koukl, on August 1, 2024
https://www.str.org/w/it-s-time-to-forget-faith-
In this discussion, Greg Koukl proposes a redefinition of "faith" to better align with rational and evidence-based thinking. Koukl suggests that faith should be understood as "confident convictions based on good reasons" rather than as mere belief without evidence. His goal is to reshape the perception of faith, framing it as a position supported by logical and rational foundations. This redefinition aims to counter the common criticism that faith is irrational or unsupported by evidence.
The panel’s reactions to Koukl’s argument reflect a range of perspectives. Damian criticizes Koukl’s approach by arguing that renaming faith does not address the underlying issue of evidence. He suggests that believers often shift the conversation away from substantial evidence to unrelated topics, such as evolutionary theory or cosmology, to avoid engaging with the core issue of evidence supporting their beliefs.
Aaron adds to the critique by questioning Koukl’s "three pillars" of active trust: reliable evidence, reliable witnesses, and convincing proofs. He argues that historical evidence supporting Christianity is often lacking and inconsistent, challenging the adequacy of these pillars in substantiating faith claims. Aaron’s position highlights the difficulty of relying on these pillars when the evidence is not robust or comprehensive.
AJ also questions the efficacy of Koukl’s redefinition. He sees it as a superficial rebranding that does not solve the deeper issue of insufficient evidence. AJ argues that changing the definition of faith does not address the fundamental problems of evidence and reason that believers face. He raises concerns about why believers resist the term "faith" if it truly reflects their belief process and whether the redefinition genuinely addresses the criticisms of faith.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.37.2 featuring Infidel 64, AJ, Damien H and Aaron Jensen
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
https://www.str.org/w/it-s-time-to-forget-faith-
In this discussion, Greg Koukl proposes a redefinition of "faith" to better align with rational and evidence-based thinking. Koukl suggests that faith should be understood as "confident convictions based on good reasons" rather than as mere belief without evidence. His goal is to reshape the perception of faith, framing it as a position supported by logical and rational foundations. This redefinition aims to counter the common criticism that faith is irrational or unsupported by evidence.
The panel’s reactions to Koukl’s argument reflect a range of perspectives. Damian criticizes Koukl’s approach by arguing that renaming faith does not address the underlying issue of evidence. He suggests that believers often shift the conversation away from substantial evidence to unrelated topics, such as evolutionary theory or cosmology, to avoid engaging with the core issue of evidence supporting their beliefs.
Aaron adds to the critique by questioning Koukl’s "three pillars" of active trust: reliable evidence, reliable witnesses, and convincing proofs. He argues that historical evidence supporting Christianity is often lacking and inconsistent, challenging the adequacy of these pillars in substantiating faith claims. Aaron’s position highlights the difficulty of relying on these pillars when the evidence is not robust or comprehensive.
AJ also questions the efficacy of Koukl’s redefinition. He sees it as a superficial rebranding that does not solve the deeper issue of insufficient evidence. AJ argues that changing the definition of faith does not address the fundamental problems of evidence and reason that believers face. He raises concerns about why believers resist the term "faith" if it truly reflects their belief process and whether the redefinition genuinely addresses the criticisms of faith.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.37.2 featuring Infidel 64, AJ, Damien H and Aaron Jensen
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
View all episodes
By Atheist Community of Austin
4.6
434434 ratings
Stand to Reason, By Greg Koukl, on August 1, 2024
https://www.str.org/w/it-s-time-to-forget-faith-
In this discussion, Greg Koukl proposes a redefinition of "faith" to better align with rational and evidence-based thinking. Koukl suggests that faith should be understood as "confident convictions based on good reasons" rather than as mere belief without evidence. His goal is to reshape the perception of faith, framing it as a position supported by logical and rational foundations. This redefinition aims to counter the common criticism that faith is irrational or unsupported by evidence.
The panel’s reactions to Koukl’s argument reflect a range of perspectives. Damian criticizes Koukl’s approach by arguing that renaming faith does not address the underlying issue of evidence. He suggests that believers often shift the conversation away from substantial evidence to unrelated topics, such as evolutionary theory or cosmology, to avoid engaging with the core issue of evidence supporting their beliefs.
Aaron adds to the critique by questioning Koukl’s "three pillars" of active trust: reliable evidence, reliable witnesses, and convincing proofs. He argues that historical evidence supporting Christianity is often lacking and inconsistent, challenging the adequacy of these pillars in substantiating faith claims. Aaron’s position highlights the difficulty of relying on these pillars when the evidence is not robust or comprehensive.
AJ also questions the efficacy of Koukl’s redefinition. He sees it as a superficial rebranding that does not solve the deeper issue of insufficient evidence. AJ argues that changing the definition of faith does not address the fundamental problems of evidence and reason that believers face. He raises concerns about why believers resist the term "faith" if it truly reflects their belief process and whether the redefinition genuinely addresses the criticisms of faith.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.37.2 featuring Infidel 64, AJ, Damien H and Aaron Jensen
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
https://www.str.org/w/it-s-time-to-forget-faith-
In this discussion, Greg Koukl proposes a redefinition of "faith" to better align with rational and evidence-based thinking. Koukl suggests that faith should be understood as "confident convictions based on good reasons" rather than as mere belief without evidence. His goal is to reshape the perception of faith, framing it as a position supported by logical and rational foundations. This redefinition aims to counter the common criticism that faith is irrational or unsupported by evidence.
The panel’s reactions to Koukl’s argument reflect a range of perspectives. Damian criticizes Koukl’s approach by arguing that renaming faith does not address the underlying issue of evidence. He suggests that believers often shift the conversation away from substantial evidence to unrelated topics, such as evolutionary theory or cosmology, to avoid engaging with the core issue of evidence supporting their beliefs.
Aaron adds to the critique by questioning Koukl’s "three pillars" of active trust: reliable evidence, reliable witnesses, and convincing proofs. He argues that historical evidence supporting Christianity is often lacking and inconsistent, challenging the adequacy of these pillars in substantiating faith claims. Aaron’s position highlights the difficulty of relying on these pillars when the evidence is not robust or comprehensive.
AJ also questions the efficacy of Koukl’s redefinition. He sees it as a superficial rebranding that does not solve the deeper issue of insufficient evidence. AJ argues that changing the definition of faith does not address the fundamental problems of evidence and reason that believers face. He raises concerns about why believers resist the term "faith" if it truly reflects their belief process and whether the redefinition genuinely addresses the criticisms of faith.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.37.2 featuring Infidel 64, AJ, Damien H and Aaron Jensen
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
More shows like The Non-Prophets
View all
The Atheist Experience
2,377 Listeners
Skeptics with a K
426 Listeners
TheThinkingAtheist
2,827 Listeners
Cognitive Dissonance
4,031 Listeners
Thank God I'm Atheist
1,890 Listeners
The Scathing Atheist
3,193 Listeners
Friendly Atheist Podcast
1,396 Listeners
The Skepticrat
1,979 Listeners
God Awful Movies
2,566 Listeners
Citation Needed
2,628 Listeners
Talk Heathen
564 Listeners
Truth Wanted
155 Listeners
D&D Minus
1,086 Listeners
Dear Old Dads
516 Listeners
The Know Rogan Experience
674 Listeners