Should students and teachers spend fewer weeks at school each year?
In this episode of Coffee and Whiteboard Markers, we explore the debate around shortening school terms, following the proposal from a School in Western Australia calling for a review of the length of the school year.
Rather than simply asking whether teachers need more holidays, we take a deeper look at what a shorter school year could actually mean for teachers, students, families and the education system.
In this episode, we discuss:
- Why teachers supported a review of the current school calendar
- Teacher workload, burnout and wellbeing
- Whether shorter terms could improve teacher retention
- The potential impact on student wellbeing and engagement
- The disadvantages of reducing instructional time
- Childcare and logistical challenges for families
- Why the proposal was rejected by the WA Education Minister
- How Australia's school year compares with countries including Finland, Japan, Singapore, Denmark, China, the United States and the United Kingdom
- Whether countries with more instructional time actually achieve better educational outcomes
- Alternatives to shorter terms, including increased non-contact time, reduced administration and better support for teachers
The bigger question may not be "Should teachers and students have more holidays?"
Perhaps it should be:
Are we using the school year and teachers' time as effectively as we could be?
🎙️ Coffee and Whiteboard Markers — Real talk for real teaching.
If you enjoy conversations about the issues affecting Australian teachers and schools, subscribe to the channel, like the video and share this episode with another educator.
👇 Join the conversation in the comments:
Would you support shorter school terms in Australia? If not, what would you change instead?