The Justice Department’s recent release of millions of pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died by suicide in 2019, shines a harsh light on a privileged network of scholars who had entered his orbit. Throughout the documents, professors butter up the financier to fund their pet projects, banter crudely about women, and appear to overlook the criminality of a man who had already been convicted on prostitution-related charges involving a minor. What do the documents reveal about the gilded world of high-profile scholarship — and about elite higher ed’s fraught relationship with money, power, and prestige?

Related Reading

Unmasking Academe’s Gilded Boys’ Club (The Chronicle)

Jeffrey Epstein’s Academic Fixer (The Chronicle)

'A Moment of Reckoning': After Epstein, Higher Ed Faces Hard Questions About Its Proximity to Power (The Chronicle) 

Guests

Nell Gluckman, senior writer at The Chronicle

Emmy Martin, reporting intern at The Chronicle 

For more on today’s episode, visit ⁠chronicle.com/collegematters⁠. We aim to make transcripts available within a day of an episode’s publication.

As president of the American Council on Education, Ted Mitchell is at the tip of the spear. A year ago, when the Trump administration moved to slash federal research funding, ACE joined a lawsuit to stop the cuts. This was a major departure for the influential higher-ed advocacy group, which is hardly ever a plaintiff in litigation. In Trump’s second term, ACE has taken a notably pugilistic approach. In addition to fighting in courtrooms, Mitchell has been active in the court of public opinion, casting the Trump administration’s agenda as both unlawful and unwise. But not everyone agrees on the nature of the Trump threat or how to respond to it, which puts Mitchell in a tricky spot. Can he unite this disparate constituency?

Related Reading
How Higher Ed Staved Off a Research-Funding Bloodbath — For Now (The Chronicle)

Statement by Higher Education Associations in Opposition to Trump Administration Compact (American Council on Education)

'A Robust Victory: Federal Judge Says Harvard Should have Billions of Research Dollars Restored (The Chronicle)

Guest
Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education

For more on today’s episode, visit chronicle.com/collegematters. We aim to make transcripts available within a day of an episode’s publication.

In its long and often tortured history, the faculty-job-protection status known as tenure has been defended as an essential safeguard for academic freedom. Professors, the argument goes, need to know that they won’t get fired for researching and teaching about controversial topics. In theory, tenure provides that necessary security. But critics of the system, who balk at the idea of a “job for life,” are unmoved by this defense. State lawmakers are busy chipping away at tenure’s protections or even seeking to do away with it altogether. But if the traditional argument for tenure’s existence is failing, what are its supporters to do? Is there a case for the system beyond academic freedom?

Related Reading

The War on Tenure (Deepa Das Acevedo / Cambridge University Press) 

Tenure Will Be Eliminated at Most of Oklahoma's Public Colleges, Governor Says⁠ (The Chronicle) 

The Strange, Secret History of Tenure (The Review) 

A Professor Was Fired for Her Politics. Is That the Future of Academia? (The New York Times Magazine)

Guest

Deepa Das Acevedo, associate professor of law at Emory University

For more on today’s episode, visit chronicle.com/collegematters. We aim to make transcripts available within a day of an episode’s publication.

Outcome-driven investigations. Threats of dizzying fines. Broad claims of rampant, unchecked antisemitism. The Trump administration’s playbook against higher education is familiar by now, and it always presents universities with the same stark choice: Pay up or face a potentially yearslong legal battle with an extremely powerful adversary. Washington insiders and judges say Trump’s tactics are legally dubious at best, breaking with procedural rules and even violating the U.S. Constitution. But will any of that matter in the end?

Related Reading

The Shakedown: How Trump’s Justice Department pressured lawyers to ‘find’ evidence that UCLA had tolerated antisemitism (The Chronicle/ProPublica) 

The Improbable Warrior: Why the unlikely leader of Trump’s antisemitism task force may be the perfect man for the job. (The Chronicle/ProPublica) 

Trump Wants $1 Billion From UCLA for Its ‘Hostile Environment.’ What Is That? (The Chronicle) 

Guests

Peter Elkind, national investigative reporter at ProPublica

Katie Mangan, senior writer at The Chronicle of Higher Education 

For more on today’s episode, visit chronicle.com/collegematters. We aim to make transcripts available within a day of an episode’s publication.

The fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, who was killed on Saturday during an encounter with federal immigration agents in Minneapolis, has further escalated tensions in a metropolitan area dotted with college campuses. As the region reels with civil unrest, area universities are grappling with how to maintain safe operations. They’re also facing pressure to exert stronger moral leadership as their institutions’ values are tested in real time.
Related Reading

Navigating Campus Life Amid ICE Enforcement (The Chronicle)

After Another ICE Killing, Minnesota’s Flagship Faces a Test (The Chronicle)

Guests

Scott Carlson⁠, senior writer at The Chronicle of Higher Education 

Fae Hodges, University of Minnesota Twin Cities student

Alexander Boni-Saenz, a law professor at the University of Minnesota

Politics. Culture. Affordability. The biggest issues facing the country are playing out in higher education, and College Matters from The Chronicle is here to make sense of it all. Beginning January 28, tune in for all new weekly episodes of The Chronicle of Higher Education’s podcast.

Catch up on previous episodes

Interview: Chris Rufo Floats Calling in the ‘Troops’ 

Why Faculty Hate Teaching Evaluations 

Has Harvard Gone Soft?

For more on today’s episode, visit chronicle.com/collegematters.

As 2025 comes to a close, higher education is at an inflection point. Political pressure, rising costs, and the dizzying pace of technological change are putting new stress on an already beleaguered system. It’s tempting at a time like this to obsess over the precarious present, but it’s worth pausing for a moment to consider the past. With the benefit of hindsight, what trends and developments of the past 25 years have proved to be the most consequential for higher education? More simply put: How in the heck did we get here?

Related Reading

Explore the Quarter-Century Project (The Chronicle)

A Year of Challenges and Uncertainty, as Told Through Data (The Chronicle) 

Behold, the Decade of Monsters and Men (The Chronicle) 

U. of Richmond Leader Pushes City to Face Its Slave History (The Chronicle)

Guests

Edward L. Ayers, professor of the humanities and president emeritus at the U. of Richmond 

Sarah Brown, senior editor at The Chronicle of Higher Education 

Andy Thomason, assistant managing editor at The Chronicle of Higher Education

It’s been a pivotal year for higher education, and that’s particularly true for college professors. The ubiquity of artificial intelligence, the enormity of political pressure, and the severity of financial constraints on many college campuses have conspired to create learning environments of profound unease and uncertainty. At the same time, many faculty members look at 2025 as a year when the promise of new technologies became more clear, and the strength of collegial communities became more crucial. Can a year like this be summed up in a single word? We’ll find out.  

Related Reading: 

Sign up to receive The Chronicle’s Teaching newsletter

AI Has Joined the Faculty (The Chronicle) 

How to Restore Joy in the Classroom (The Chronicle)  

Grading is Broken (The Chronicle) 

Guest: 

Beth McMurtrie, senior writer at The Chronicle of Higher Education

Beckie Supiano, senior writer at The Chronicle of Higher Education 

For more on today’s episode, visit chronicle.com/collegematters. We aim to make transcripts available within a day of an episode’s publication.

Nearly three years after ChatGPT first came on the scene, college students are using generative AI to help with myriad tasks. Outlining and brainstorming are a breeze. A tough concept, skimmed over by a professor during a lecture, can probably be explained succinctly by a chatbot. This kind of AI use is happening on college campuses across the country, and much of it wouldn’t be considered unethical. But the line between efficiency and academic dishonesty is blurry, and some experts are concerned that an AI-infused education could essentially rewire students’ brains. So, how do colleges weigh the promise of AI against its much-discussed perils?
Related Reading:

These Students Use AI a Lot — but Not to Cheat (The Chronicle)  

The Cheating Vibe Shift (College Matters: Apple / Spotify) 

Should College Graduates Be AI Literate? (The Chronicle) 

Guest:
Beth McMurtrie, senior writer at The Chronicle of Higher  Education

For more on today’s episode, visit chronicle.com/collegematters. We aim to make transcripts available within a day of an episode’s publication.

One university president has resigned. Another is on the ropes. A new governor is heading into office, flipping party control to the Democrats. It’s all happening in Virginia, which has become a key battleground in a larger political war over higher education. This past summer, Jim Ryan resigned as president of the University of Virginia, hoping to stave off federal investigations of the university's diversity efforts. Now, Gregory Washington, president of George Mason University, is under fire for similar issues and fighting to keep his job. In tumultuous fashion, the commonwealth of Virginia has become a tinderbox of state and federal political fury — and there’s no clear end in sight.
Related Reading
House Republicans Say George Mason Leader Broke the Law. His Lawyer Sees ‘a Political Lynching.’ (The Chronicle) 
Virginia Democrats Block College Board Appointees, Leaving George Mason’s Without a Quorum. (The Chronicle) 
The U. of Virginia’s President Was Targeted Over DEI. Now He’s Resigning. (The Chronicle)
Guest
Jasper Smith, staff reporter at The Chronicle of Higher Education

For more on today’s episode, visit chronicle.com/collegematters. We aim to make transcripts available within a day of an episode’s publication.