Recorded Live at ClaimsXChange in Nashville on April 30, 2025. 

Joshua Gilliland spoke on Preserving Evidence – The Intent to Deprive with James Daley from Consilio and W. Brett Mason, Esq., from Degan, Blanchard & Nash. The seminar covered the Intent to Deprive under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule Rule 37 and related case law. The session addressed the duty to preserve electronic evidence, strategies and technology for collecting electronically stored information, and the six-factor analysis to show the Intend to Deprive under Rule 37.

Have a topic you'd like Bob to cover? Submit it to [email protected], or connect with Bob directly on LinkedIn.

And if you'd like to know more about GPSL, check out our website.

You can also find us on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook.

Join Bob Sallander for this except from the Trial Admissibility seminar hosted by the Santa Clara County Bar Association's Civil Practice Committee. 

Have a topic you'd like Bob to cover? Submit it to [email protected], or connect with Bob directly on LinkedIn.

And if you'd like to know more about GPSL, check out our website.

You can also find us on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook.

Robert Sallander presented at the Santa Clara County Bar Association's Civil Practice Committee's seminar on Trial Admissibility on April 24, 2025. The following is an except from that presentation where Bob discussed the Court of Appeal decision Odom v. L.A. Community College District. Stay tune for other highlights from this seminar on admissibility. 

Have a topic you'd like Bob to cover? Submit it to [email protected], or connect with Bob directly on LinkedIn.

And if you'd like to know more about GPSL, check out our website.

You can also find us on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook.

California Insurance Bulletin 2025-7 states the position that recent case law does not remove coverage for smoke damage claims. Bob Sallander is highly critical of the bulletin from the office of Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara, explaining that Bulletin 2025-7 misstates both Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v. Vigilant Insurance Company (Cal. Supreme Ct., 2024) 15 Cal.5th 1106 and Gharibian v. Wawanesa General Insurance Company (Cal. Ct. of Appeal, 2 nd Dist., Div. 2, 2025)
2025 WL 426092. Join Bob Sallander for his summary of case law and how Bulletin 2025-7 is founded upon faulty logic. 

Have a topic you'd like Bob to cover? Submit it to [email protected], or connect with Bob directly on LinkedIn.

And if you'd like to know more about GPSL, check out our website.

You can also find us on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook.

Robert Sallander discusses the complex litigation against Southern California Edison for the Eaton Wildfire brought by over 100 insurance companies in Los Angeles Superior Court. 

Have a topic you'd like Bob to cover? Submit it to [email protected], or connect with Bob directly on LinkedIn.

And if you'd like to know more about GPSL, check out our website.

You can also find us on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook.

This week, Bob discusses a recent Ninth Circuit decision that could greatly affect insurance suits resulting from the LA wildfires. Learn why insureds might be in trouble if their cases get removed to federal court. 

Have a topic you'd like Bob to cover? Submit it to [email protected], or connect with Bob directly on LinkedIn.

And if you'd like to know more about GPSL, check out our website.

You can also find us on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook.

Coverage Position Letters (CPLs) are supposed to be straightforward and informative letters about why a claim may not be covered.  

But Bob has noticed that these letters are often overbroad, throwing in everything but the kitchen sink. Actually, a lot of them probably throw that in too, because that leaky sink is not part of the damage they agreed to cover.

This week, Bob addresses how insurers can balance clarity in CPLs while still covering their bases on potential defenses. 

Have a topic you'd like Bob to cover? Submit it to [email protected], or connect with Bob directly on LinkedIn.

And if you'd like to know more about GPSL, check out our website.

You can also find us on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook.

In our discussions of the LA wildfires, we’ve talked a lot about homes that were destroyed by burning. But what about those impacted by smoke and ash? This week, Bob discusses Gharibian vs. Wawanesa Gen. Ins. Company, a recent case addressing this issue, and how to stand the best chance of being compensated for potential damage from smoke, ash, and soot.

Have a topic you'd like Bob to cover? Submit it to [email protected], or connect with Bob directly on LinkedIn.

And if you'd like to know more about GPSL, check out our website.

You can also find us on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook.

The LA Department of Water and Power is spending a pretty penny on a law firm to defend them against litigation resulting from the Palisades Fire. The price tag of the firm made Bob wonder: Was any insurance agency involved in selecting the firm? This week, he uses that framework to discuss selection of counsel and litigation management issues.

Have a topic you'd like Bob to cover? Submit it to [email protected], or connect with Bob directly on LinkedIn.

And if you'd like to know more about GPSL, check out our website.

You can also find us on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook.

This week, Bob continues his discussion of the LA Wildfires, providing a case example that demonstrates mistakes that can be made by both insurers and insureds around policy limits and claims adjustments.  

Have a topic you'd like Bob to cover? Submit it to [email protected], or connect with Bob directly on LinkedIn.

And if you'd like to know more about GPSL, check out our website.

You can also find us on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook.