
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Speaker: Professor Orla Lynskey, University College London
Abstract: The EU ‘digital empire’ seeks to align technological development to its rights and values by adopting and promoting a rights-driven model of technological regulation. Bradford’s influential characterisation of EU digital strategy is credible when one maps the array of legal ‘Acts’ applicable to data, digital markets, digital services and AI adopted by the EU in recent years, all of which are without prejudice to the EU data protection law. Yet, when one delves deeper, the EU’s commitment to rights-based regulation of the digital sphere is not iron-clad. Rather, as we demonstrate through an empirical analysis of the European Commission’s adequacy decisions over a quarter of a century (1999-2024), there are clear divergences amongst EU institutions about the balance to be struck between fundamental rights and economic interests. Such divergence suggest the EU might more accurately be characterised as an amalgamation of fiefdoms rather than an empire. This inter-institutional dynamic is relevant to the legitimacy of EU actions in the digital sphere and may foreshadow the future direction of EU data law.
For more information see:
https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/weekly-seminar-series
3.4
55 ratings
Speaker: Professor Orla Lynskey, University College London
Abstract: The EU ‘digital empire’ seeks to align technological development to its rights and values by adopting and promoting a rights-driven model of technological regulation. Bradford’s influential characterisation of EU digital strategy is credible when one maps the array of legal ‘Acts’ applicable to data, digital markets, digital services and AI adopted by the EU in recent years, all of which are without prejudice to the EU data protection law. Yet, when one delves deeper, the EU’s commitment to rights-based regulation of the digital sphere is not iron-clad. Rather, as we demonstrate through an empirical analysis of the European Commission’s adequacy decisions over a quarter of a century (1999-2024), there are clear divergences amongst EU institutions about the balance to be struck between fundamental rights and economic interests. Such divergence suggest the EU might more accurately be characterised as an amalgamation of fiefdoms rather than an empire. This inter-institutional dynamic is relevant to the legitimacy of EU actions in the digital sphere and may foreshadow the future direction of EU data law.
For more information see:
https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/weekly-seminar-series
1,841 Listeners
4,246 Listeners
23 Listeners
892 Listeners
16 Listeners
831 Listeners
0 Listeners
1 Listeners
15 Listeners
3 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
76 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
220 Listeners
696 Listeners
740 Listeners
172 Listeners
3,104 Listeners
974 Listeners
142 Listeners
4 Listeners
99 Listeners