
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Speaker: Professor Orla Lynskey, University College London
Abstract: The EU ‘digital empire’ seeks to align technological development to its rights and values by adopting and promoting a rights-driven model of technological regulation. Bradford’s influential characterisation of EU digital strategy is credible when one maps the array of legal ‘Acts’ applicable to data, digital markets, digital services and AI adopted by the EU in recent years, all of which are without prejudice to the EU data protection law. Yet, when one delves deeper, the EU’s commitment to rights-based regulation of the digital sphere is not iron-clad. Rather, as we demonstrate through an empirical analysis of the European Commission’s adequacy decisions over a quarter of a century (1999-2024), there are clear divergences amongst EU institutions about the balance to be struck between fundamental rights and economic interests. Such divergence suggest the EU might more accurately be characterised as an amalgamation of fiefdoms rather than an empire. This inter-institutional dynamic is relevant to the legitimacy of EU actions in the digital sphere and may foreshadow the future direction of EU data law.
For more information see:
https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/weekly-seminar-series
3.4
55 ratings
Speaker: Professor Orla Lynskey, University College London
Abstract: The EU ‘digital empire’ seeks to align technological development to its rights and values by adopting and promoting a rights-driven model of technological regulation. Bradford’s influential characterisation of EU digital strategy is credible when one maps the array of legal ‘Acts’ applicable to data, digital markets, digital services and AI adopted by the EU in recent years, all of which are without prejudice to the EU data protection law. Yet, when one delves deeper, the EU’s commitment to rights-based regulation of the digital sphere is not iron-clad. Rather, as we demonstrate through an empirical analysis of the European Commission’s adequacy decisions over a quarter of a century (1999-2024), there are clear divergences amongst EU institutions about the balance to be struck between fundamental rights and economic interests. Such divergence suggest the EU might more accurately be characterised as an amalgamation of fiefdoms rather than an empire. This inter-institutional dynamic is relevant to the legitimacy of EU actions in the digital sphere and may foreshadow the future direction of EU data law.
For more information see:
https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/weekly-seminar-series
5,447 Listeners
20 Listeners
1,530 Listeners
2,122 Listeners
12 Listeners
16 Listeners
293 Listeners
2 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
9 Listeners
5 Listeners
16 Listeners
0 Listeners
22 Listeners
138 Listeners
3,000 Listeners
6 Listeners
2,200 Listeners
837 Listeners
304 Listeners
179 Listeners
2,192 Listeners
830 Listeners