
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Speaker: Professor Orla Lynskey, University College London
Abstract: The EU ‘digital empire’ seeks to align technological development to its rights and values by adopting and promoting a rights-driven model of technological regulation. Bradford’s influential characterisation of EU digital strategy is credible when one maps the array of legal ‘Acts’ applicable to data, digital markets, digital services and AI adopted by the EU in recent years, all of which are without prejudice to the EU data protection law. Yet, when one delves deeper, the EU’s commitment to rights-based regulation of the digital sphere is not iron-clad. Rather, as we demonstrate through an empirical analysis of the European Commission’s adequacy decisions over a quarter of a century (1999-2024), there are clear divergences amongst EU institutions about the balance to be struck between fundamental rights and economic interests. Such divergence suggest the EU might more accurately be characterised as an amalgamation of fiefdoms rather than an empire. This inter-institutional dynamic is relevant to the legitimacy of EU actions in the digital sphere and may foreshadow the future direction of EU data law.
For more information see:
https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/weekly-seminar-series
3.4
55 ratings
Speaker: Professor Orla Lynskey, University College London
Abstract: The EU ‘digital empire’ seeks to align technological development to its rights and values by adopting and promoting a rights-driven model of technological regulation. Bradford’s influential characterisation of EU digital strategy is credible when one maps the array of legal ‘Acts’ applicable to data, digital markets, digital services and AI adopted by the EU in recent years, all of which are without prejudice to the EU data protection law. Yet, when one delves deeper, the EU’s commitment to rights-based regulation of the digital sphere is not iron-clad. Rather, as we demonstrate through an empirical analysis of the European Commission’s adequacy decisions over a quarter of a century (1999-2024), there are clear divergences amongst EU institutions about the balance to be struck between fundamental rights and economic interests. Such divergence suggest the EU might more accurately be characterised as an amalgamation of fiefdoms rather than an empire. This inter-institutional dynamic is relevant to the legitimacy of EU actions in the digital sphere and may foreshadow the future direction of EU data law.
For more information see:
https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/weekly-seminar-series
5,413 Listeners
4,338 Listeners
525 Listeners
2,099 Listeners
903 Listeners
275 Listeners
949 Listeners
1,891 Listeners
586 Listeners
11 Listeners
17 Listeners
292 Listeners
0 Listeners
2 Listeners
9 Listeners
786 Listeners
5 Listeners
14 Listeners
0 Listeners
3 Listeners
89 Listeners
1 Listeners
20 Listeners
282 Listeners
82 Listeners