Dr. Spencer and Karl Nadolsky sit down with David W, a nurse practitioner and one of the actual patients enrolled in the Triumph 1 retatrutide phase 3 trial, to break down the data that was just presented at the American Diabetes Association conference and explain why everyone in obesity medicine is paying very close attention.

In this episode they cover what retatrutide actually is and why adding glucagon agonism to the GLP-1 and GIP dual agonism of tirzepatide creates a meaningfully different drug with direct effects on liver lipid metabolism, insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, and fat catabolism that you do not see with semaglutide or tirzepatide alone, what David's personal experience in the 12 milligram arm looked like from dose escalation through steady state including the GI side effects that faded by month seven and the heartburn that a low dose PPI fixed quickly, how David went from 240 pounds and a BMI of 35 down to 167 pounds by the end of the trial representing roughly 30 percent weight loss which is right at the trial average, what the Triumph 1 obesity trial found at 80 weeks with the nine and 12 milligram doses delivering nearly 26 and 28 percent average weight loss respectively and almost half of patients on the highest dose losing 30 percent or more, why the 104 week extension data showing patients who stayed on 12 milligrams reaching 30.3 percent average weight loss is being compared to bariatric surgery outcomes, what the Transcend type 2 diabetes trial showed with average A1C dropping to 5.9 percent on the 12 milligram dose in patients who were on no other diabetes medication, why the 41 percent triglyceride reduction and 20 percent LDL reduction are particularly interesting given that the mechanism appears to involve multiple pathways in the liver that tirzepatide and semaglutide do not touch, what the 70 percent reduction in WOMAC knee arthritis pain scores and 60 percent reduction in sleep apnea events mean for patients who have been told their only option is surgery, how Spencer plans to use retatrutide clinically once it is approved and which patients he thinks are the right candidates, why the gray market research peptide version currently circulating is something both doctors strongly advise against, and what Triumph 2 and Triumph 3 are measuring and when that data is expected.

The Docs Who Lift podcast distills and simplifies the complexities of exercise, medicine, and weight loss. Subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Dr. Spencer Nadolsky and Karl break down two brand new randomized controlled trials that put hard numbers on a question they have been navigating clinically for years: what actually happens to patients on GLP-1 medicines when they try to lower their dose, switch to a cheaper option, or come off entirely.

In this episode they cover why obesity biology actively fights back against weight loss through hunger hormones, fat cell hormones, and hypothalamic signaling in ways that make maintenance genuinely hard for most people and not a failure of willpower, what the Surmount-4 trial showed about weight regain when people came off tirzepatide after losing an average of 21 percent of their body weight and why that 17 percent who maintained their weight off medication is a number that keeps showing up across multiple studies, what the brand new Surmount-Maintain trial did by reducing some patients from their maximum tolerated dose of tirzepatide down to five milligrams and what that meant for weight outcomes at 112 weeks, why the average line graph in these trials can make it look like everyone on the max dose kept their weight off when the waterfall plots tell a more complicated story with roughly 25 to 30 percent of people on the highest dose still not maintaining 85 percent of their weight loss, what rescue tirzepatide was and why two thirds of placebo patients needed it, what the Attain-Maintain trial tested by switching patients who finished Surmount-5 from tirzepatide or semaglutide over to orforglipron and whether an oral GLP-1 can hold the weight that an injectable one lost, why orforglipron is not yet cost efficient enough for most patients as a maintenance strategy despite the promising data, why Spencer and Karl both see fewer than five percent of their own patients regain significant weight on the maximum tolerated dose and what that gap between clinical experience and trial data might be telling us, the weight independent benefits of GLP-1 medicines including blood sugar control and cardiovascular effects that matter even if weight stays the same, and why people injecting unapproved research peptides like retatrutide without FDA approval or human safety data is something both doctors find genuinely alarming.

The Docs Who Lift podcast distills and simplifies the complexities of exercise, medicine, and weight loss. Subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Dr. Spencer Nadolsky and Karl sit down with Dr. Susan Brian, a Yale-trained endocrinologist, certified menopause provider, and medical director of a clinic with seven endocrinologists who runs an active bone fragility fracture clinic, to answer the question that has been flooding social media since a viral abstract with two fake bones on a surgical table convinced people their skeletons are quietly dissolving.

Follow Dr. Susan here

In this episode they cover why the preclinical and mechanistic data on GLP-1 medicines actually points toward bone benefit rather than harm by improving osteoblast activity and reducing osteoclast activity, why the meta-analyses from over two decades of GLP-1 use in type 2 diabetes show reduced fracture risk rather than increased risk, what the recent Israeli retrospective cohort study actually found and why an 11% increased fragility fracture signal in older adults on GLP-1 for diabetes versus other treatments deserves attention without panic, why almost every nutritional deficiency flagged in GLP-1 patients turns out to be vitamin D deficiency that likely predated the medicine, why the degree of weight loss matters far more than the medicine itself and how the one to two pounds per week threshold and the one percent of body weight per week guideline translate into real clinical practice, what the Hansen JAMA 2024 study showed about GLP-1 alone versus GLP-1 with resistance training and why that finding is the single most important takeaway for anyone on these medicines, why Spencer has idiopathic hypercalciuria and was spilling 650 milligrams of calcium per day in his urine before anyone caught it, how romosozumab works and why it is the most powerful bone building medicine available, why Dr. Brian orders baseline bone densities on patients well before the standard screening age and why insurance almost always covers it, and why comparing GLP-1 nutritional risk to bariatric surgery nutritional risk is not even close to an apples to apples comparison.

The Docs Who Lift podcast distills and simplifies the complexities of exercise, medicine, and weight loss. Subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Dr. Spencer Nadolsky and Karl sit down with Dr. Eryn Russo, a board-certified occupational and environmental medicine physician with nearly 20 years of experience working at Hill Air Force Base, where she deals with real toxic metal exposures every single day. She is one of less than one percent of all board-certified physicians practicing in this specialty, which makes her exactly the person you want explaining why the heavy metal detox content flooding your social media feed is not medicine. It is marketing.

In this episode they cover how a proper toxic exposure workup actually happens including detailed exposure history, industrial hygiene testing at the source, biological monitoring, and organ-specific testing that goes far beyond a urine panel mailed to your house, why the provoked urine test being sold by influencers is a complete artifact that artificially concentrates metals in your urine using the same chelation agent they then try to sell you as treatment, the real clinical presentations of lead, mercury, cadmium, arsenic, and chromium six and why none of them look like vague brain fog or fatigue, why the gold standard test for lead is blood not urine and what the actual diagnostic thresholds are for adults versus children, why amalgam fillings and the form of mercury previously used in vaccines are not the toxic forms people need to worry about, the Consumer Reports plant protein lead story and whether parents actually need to be concerned, why Dr. Russo has never once recommended chelation therapy in 20 years of treating workers who actually work with these chemicals daily, and why real chelation therapy carries serious renal and electrolyte risks that make unsupervised use genuinely dangerous.

The Docs Who Lift podcast distills and simplifies the complexities of exercise, medicine, and weight loss. Subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Dr. Spencer Nadolsky and Karl sit down with Dr. Adam Auton, geneticist at 23andMe, to break down a brand new paper using data from over 27,000 people that identified specific genetic variants linked to how well GLP-1 medications work and how likely someone is to experience side effects. 23andMe has over 11 million people in their research database and used voluntary survey data on medication use, dosage, duration, weight loss, and side effects to match against genetic profiles at scale, making this one of the most powerful datasets anyone has brought to this question.

In this episode they cover how genome-wide association studies work and why scanning 600,000 genetic variants at once lets researchers find signals they never could have predicted in advance, why the first signal that jumped out of the data was a variant right in the GLP-1 receptor itself and why that was the moment the team knew they were on the right track, why the same variant that predicts better efficacy also predicts a higher risk of side effects and what that tells us about how the drug is being processed, why tirzepatide users showed a separate signal in the GIP receptor that modulates side effects rather than weight loss, why carrying both variants could make someone 14 times more likely to experience side effects on tirzepatide, why genetics explains roughly 10 percent of weight loss variation and what the other 90 percent looks like, why women tend to respond better than men and why diabetics tend to respond less well, what the future of this research looks like including who regains weight after stopping and whether those patterns are genetically predictable, and why heritability is a statistical measure that gets badly misunderstood even by clinicians.

The Docs Who Lift podcast distills and simplifies the complexities of exercise, medicine, and weight loss. Subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

5:37 PM

Dr. Spencer Nadolsky and Karl sit down with Dr. Henning Langer, PhD researcher at the Charité in Berlin and founder of his own muscle metabolism lab, to break down his newly published paper combining rodent and human data to look directly at what GLP-1 medicines actually do to skeletal muscle beyond what a DEXA scan can tell you. Dr. Langer spent time at Boehringer Ingelheim specifically studying skeletal muscle during obesity and anti-obesity treatment before bringing that work to his own lab, and this paper is one of the only studies to date that has looked at muscle directly rather than lean body mass as a proxy.

In this episode they cover why the step one trial's 40 percent lean mass loss figure may not be as alarming as it sounds and why most incretin trials actually land closer to the expected 25 percent, why lean body mass on a DEXA scan conflates muscle with glycogen, liver weight, and water in ways that overstate actual muscle loss, why the mice on semaglutide that looked the roughest in their cage ran the best on the treadmill to exhaustion, what mitochondrial protein changes in the proteome data suggest about a possible fatigue resistance benefit that cannot be explained by fat loss alone, how absolute muscle force tended to drop slightly while relative strength and endurance held up, what the human data from Nottingham showed about maximum voluntary contraction and knee extension force in patients on GLP-1 treatment, why the geriatric population is the next big unanswered question in this space, and why resistance training combined with high protein still cuts muscle loss in half and remains the most powerful lever available regardless of what the pharmacology does.

The Docs Who Lift podcast distills and simplifies the complexities of exercise, medicine, and weight loss. Subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Dr. Spencer Nadolsky and Dr. Karl Nadolsky sit down with Dr. Stuart Phillips, senior author on the newly updated American College of Sports Medicine position stand on resistance training, to break down what 137 systematic reviews and over 30,000 participants actually tell us about building muscle, getting stronger, and improving function across the lifespan. The last version of these guidelines was published in 2009 and the science has come a long way, even if the fundamentals have not.

In this episode they cover why lifting weights twice a week is already getting most of the available benefit and three times is better but not by as much as you think, why the hypertrophy rep range is far broader than the classic 8 to 12 and what that actually means for your training, why getting stronger still requires lifting heavy things regardless of what anyone tells you, how power training is about moving with intentional velocity and why it matters more as you age than most people realize, why periodization showed no statistically significant advantage over non-periodized programs in the systematic review and what that means in practice, why eccentrically biased training produces slightly better muscle growth but is an optimization tool not a fundamental one, why time under tension does not have the evidence base people think it does, why blood flow restriction remains a niche tool rather than a strategic advantage, and why the best workout is simply the one you will actually show up and do consistently.

The Docs Who Lift podcast distills and simplifies the complexities of exercise, medicine, and weight loss. Subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Dr. Spencer Nadolsky, Dr. Karl, and chief science officer Dr. Grant Tinsley sit down with Dr. Steven Heymsfield, physician at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center and lead author on the BELIEVE trial, to break down what happens when you combine bimagrumab with semaglutide and why over 90 percent of weight lost in the combination group was pure fat. Dr. Heymsfield has published over 600 peer reviewed articles and is widely considered one of the foremost body composition researchers in the world, and Grant Tinsley credits him as a foundational influence on his own work in the field.

In this episode they cover what bimagrumab actually is and how blocking the activin receptor causes muscle to grow, the origin story of the drug from Novartis to Versanus to Lilly and why sarcopenia research accidentally opened the door to obesity treatment, the nine group trial design and what it really boils down to, why the bimagrumab only group lost 7 percent of their weight entirely as fat without reducing food intake, the LDL cholesterol finding that has everyone talking and whether it actually matters, what happens to muscle and weight when you come off both drugs, why visceral adipose tissue practically disappeared in the antibody treated groups, the functional outcomes data including grip strength and physical activity scales, whether a subcutaneous version is coming, and what the future of this drug class looks like now that Lilly has deprioritized it.

The Docs Who Lift podcast distills and simplifies the complexities of exercise, medicine, and weight loss. Subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Dr. Spencer and Karl Nadolsky bring on Dr. Alyssa Olenick, exercise physiologist and postdoctoral researcher in menopause and metabolism, to cut through the noise on one of the most misrepresented topics in women's health.

Dr. Olenick holds a PhD in exercise physiology, completed postdoctoral training focused on menopause and body composition, and is the founder of the Liss Method, a hybrid training program combining strength and endurance. She has been doing women-specific and sex-difference research since her master's degree and is one of the sharper voices pushing back on the wave of pseudoscience targeting women in the fitness space.

In this episode they cover what actually changes in body composition during the menopausal transition and what does not, why fitness status matters more than menstrual cycle phase or contraceptive use, how the fitness industry profits from pinkifying advice that was never women-specific to begin with, the truth about rep ranges and why effort matters more than the number, cortisol myths and why the adaptive stress response to exercise is not your enemy, and how to approach training adjustments during perimenopause without overcorrecting into low intensity fear-based programming.

No pseudoscience. No pink packets. Just the research.
Follow Dr. Olenick Here

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Takeaways:

Creatine is a naturally occurring compound that helps regenerate ATP, the energy currency of the cell.

Supplementing with creatine can enhance performance in high-intensity exercise but may not be beneficial for endurance activities.

The majority of creatine is stored in muscle, and supplementation can help fill those stores for better energy availability.

Creatine monohydrate is the most studied and effective form of creatine, and it's also the cheapest.

There is no need to cycle creatine; continuous use is safe and effective.

Creatine supplementation is generally safe, but individuals should inform their healthcare providers about its use.

The benefits of creatine are most pronounced in individuals engaging in high-intensity exercise.

Creatine does not directly build muscle; it requires exercise to be effective.

There is a misconception that creatine is harmful to the kidneys; it is safe for healthy individuals.

Creatine supplementation may have potential cognitive benefits, but more research is needed.

Follow Dr. Lauren

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.