
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Guest Host Lucy Caldwell and Dmitri Mehlhorn (Founder, The Atoll Society) have a conversation about political risk, institutional blind spots, and what scenario-based thinking reveals that conventional analysis often misses.
They discuss the Atoll Society’s simulation salons, which use scenario-based exercises to test assumptions about power, institutions, and the rule of law. Rather than predict outcomes, the goal is to surface blind spots: where existing frameworks for understanding democracy, law, and political behavior may no longer fully apply.
The conversation turns to the violence in Minnesota, the uneven application of state power, and the idea that political systems often change less through dramatic breaks than through accumulation—small decisions that reshape incentives and expectations over time.
They examine why political leaders and institutions tend to emphasize reassurance, even in periods of uncertainty, and how that instinct can limit honest discussions about risk. Along the way, they consider how history, founding-era debates, and comparative examples can help anchor difficult conversations without resorting to speculation.
POLITICOLOGY+
Not yet a Politicology+ member? Don’t miss all the extra episodes on the private, ad-free version of this podcast. Upgrade now at politicology.com/plus.
CONTRIBUTE TO POLITICOLOGY
politicology.com/donate
SPONSORS & PROMO CODES https://bit.ly/44uAGZ8
Send your questions and ideas to [email protected] or leave a voicemail at (703) 239-3068
Follow this week’s panel on X (formerly Twitter):
https://x.com/lucymcaldwell
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By Politicology4.8
1588115,881 ratings
Guest Host Lucy Caldwell and Dmitri Mehlhorn (Founder, The Atoll Society) have a conversation about political risk, institutional blind spots, and what scenario-based thinking reveals that conventional analysis often misses.
They discuss the Atoll Society’s simulation salons, which use scenario-based exercises to test assumptions about power, institutions, and the rule of law. Rather than predict outcomes, the goal is to surface blind spots: where existing frameworks for understanding democracy, law, and political behavior may no longer fully apply.
The conversation turns to the violence in Minnesota, the uneven application of state power, and the idea that political systems often change less through dramatic breaks than through accumulation—small decisions that reshape incentives and expectations over time.
They examine why political leaders and institutions tend to emphasize reassurance, even in periods of uncertainty, and how that instinct can limit honest discussions about risk. Along the way, they consider how history, founding-era debates, and comparative examples can help anchor difficult conversations without resorting to speculation.
POLITICOLOGY+
Not yet a Politicology+ member? Don’t miss all the extra episodes on the private, ad-free version of this podcast. Upgrade now at politicology.com/plus.
CONTRIBUTE TO POLITICOLOGY
politicology.com/donate
SPONSORS & PROMO CODES https://bit.ly/44uAGZ8
Send your questions and ideas to [email protected] or leave a voicemail at (703) 239-3068
Follow this week’s panel on X (formerly Twitter):
https://x.com/lucymcaldwell
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

32,349 Listeners

3,392 Listeners

12,727 Listeners

4,653 Listeners

8,567 Listeners

4,028 Listeners

8,356 Listeners

4,661 Listeners

10,473 Listeners

9,281 Listeners

2,607 Listeners

2,321 Listeners

3,187 Listeners

7,027 Listeners

3,479 Listeners