
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Yesterday’s Delaware court ruling could cost Elon Musk more than just $55 billion. The scathing, 200-page decision—by the same judge who presided over a case that led to Musk paying $44 billion for Twitter—called out the billionaire CEO for failing to disclose his sway over supposedly independent board members. She went on to characterize the pay package as unfair to shareholders and voided it.
To analyze what this means for Tesla and Musk’s other companies, Elon, Inc. called together long-time Tesla reporter Dana Hull, Businessweek's Max Chafkin, and legal reporter Jef Feeley, who has covered Delaware’s Chancery Court for three decades, for an emergency podcast.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
By Bloomberg3.3
160160 ratings
Yesterday’s Delaware court ruling could cost Elon Musk more than just $55 billion. The scathing, 200-page decision—by the same judge who presided over a case that led to Musk paying $44 billion for Twitter—called out the billionaire CEO for failing to disclose his sway over supposedly independent board members. She went on to characterize the pay package as unfair to shareholders and voided it.
To analyze what this means for Tesla and Musk’s other companies, Elon, Inc. called together long-time Tesla reporter Dana Hull, Businessweek's Max Chafkin, and legal reporter Jef Feeley, who has covered Delaware’s Chancery Court for three decades, for an emergency podcast.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

407 Listeners

1,187 Listeners

2,194 Listeners

2,005 Listeners

437 Listeners

352 Listeners

969 Listeners

193 Listeners

30 Listeners

62 Listeners

4 Listeners

155 Listeners

58 Listeners

233 Listeners

229 Listeners

63 Listeners

85 Listeners

84 Listeners

81 Listeners

408 Listeners

197 Listeners

22 Listeners

12 Listeners

152 Listeners

7 Listeners

2 Listeners

114 Listeners

24 Listeners