The Safety of Work

Ep. 118 How should we account for technological accidents?


Listen Later

Using the Waterfall incident as a striking focal point, we dissect the investigation and its aftermath, we share personal reflections on the implementation of safety recommendations and the nuances of assessing systems designed to protect us. From the mechanics of dead man's systems to the critical evaluation of managerial decisions, our dialogue exposes the delicate balance of enforcing safety while maintaining the practicality of operations. Our aim is to contribute to the ongoing conversation about creating safer work environments across industries, recognizing the need for both technological advancements and refined human judgment. 
 

Discussion Points:

  • Drew loves a paper with a great name
  • The circumstances surrounding the Waterfall rail accident
  • How the “dead man system” works on certain trains
  • Recommended changes from investigation committees
  • In the field of safety, we seem more certain about our theories
  • Exploration of narratives and facts in accident investigations
  • Dead man's system and Waterfall derailment's investigation
  • Post-accident list of operator failures
  • Safety theories and organizational fault correlation critiqued
  • Evolution of railway safety
  • Discussion on managerial decisions amidst imperfect knowledge
  • The importance of context in incident investigations
  • Safety management systems and human judgment
  • Insights on enhancing organizational safety
  • Theoretical conclusions
  • Practical takeaways
  • The answer to our episode’s question is, “yes, keep it in mind as a digital tool”

 

Quotes:

“I find that some of the most interesting things in safety don't actually come from people with traditional safety or even traditional safety backgrounds.”- Drew

“Because this is a possible risk scenario, on these trains, we have what's called a ‘dead man system.” - David

“Every time you have an accident, it must have objective physical causes, and those physical causes have to come from objective organisational failures, and I think that's a fairly fair representation of how we think about accidents in safety.” - Drew

“They focused on the dead man pedal because they couldn't find anything wrong with the design of the switch, so they assumed that it must have been the pedal that was the problem” - Drew


Resources:

The Paper: Blaming Dead Men

The Safety of Work Podcast

The Safety of Work on LinkedIn

Feedback@safetyofwork

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

The Safety of WorkBy David Provan

  • 4.8
  • 4.8
  • 4.8
  • 4.8
  • 4.8

4.8

20 ratings


More shows like The Safety of Work

View all
Dr Karl Podcast by triple j

Dr Karl Podcast

191 Listeners

Conversations by ABC listen

Conversations

875 Listeners

Freakonomics Radio by Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher

Freakonomics Radio

32,135 Listeners

PreAccident Investigation Podcast by Todd Conklin

PreAccident Investigation Podcast

169 Listeners

The Economy, Stupid by ABC listen

The Economy, Stupid

18 Listeners

Politics Now by ABC listen

Politics Now

95 Listeners

ABC News Daily by ABC

ABC News Daily

130 Listeners

If You're Listening by ABC listen

If You're Listening

317 Listeners

Cautionary Tales with Tim Harford by Pushkin Industries

Cautionary Tales with Tim Harford

5,092 Listeners

The HOP Nerd by Safety FM

The HOP Nerd

15 Listeners

HOP Into Action Podcast Series by Brent Sutton

HOP Into Action Podcast Series

3 Listeners

Not Stupid by ABC Listen

Not Stupid

64 Listeners

Empire by Goalhanger

Empire

2,019 Listeners

A HOP Podcast (With No Name) by Andrea Baker & Matt Florio

A HOP Podcast (With No Name)

12 Listeners

Punk Rock Safety by Ben Goodheart, David Provan, Ron Gantt

Punk Rock Safety

8 Listeners