
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In 2008, political pundit Don Martin penned a negative screed against former NBC wartime correspondent and at the time Alberta provincial electoral candidate Arthur Kent, aka the Scud Stud.
Convinced that Martin had violated basic journalistic ethics, Kent took him and the CanWest news chain (later Postmedia) to court for defamation of character.
Eight years later, an Alberta court ruled in Kent's favour.
What issues drove Kent to undertake such an extensive - and likely expensive - lawsuit? And what does the ruling mean for journalists in Canada?
Support CANADALAND: https://canadaland.com/join
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By CANADALAND4
150150 ratings
In 2008, political pundit Don Martin penned a negative screed against former NBC wartime correspondent and at the time Alberta provincial electoral candidate Arthur Kent, aka the Scud Stud.
Convinced that Martin had violated basic journalistic ethics, Kent took him and the CanWest news chain (later Postmedia) to court for defamation of character.
Eight years later, an Alberta court ruled in Kent's favour.
What issues drove Kent to undertake such an extensive - and likely expensive - lawsuit? And what does the ruling mean for journalists in Canada?
Support CANADALAND: https://canadaland.com/join
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

384 Listeners

144 Listeners

223 Listeners

199 Listeners

70 Listeners

65 Listeners

95 Listeners

23 Listeners

86 Listeners

9 Listeners

1,592 Listeners

419 Listeners

48 Listeners

28 Listeners

236 Listeners

112 Listeners

36 Listeners

5 Listeners