Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Episode 133: Back inside the arbitration room. Closing arguments for management editing clock rings. Thanks to Cole Billups for his expertise.
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Episode 133: Back inside the arbitration room. Closing arguments for management editing clock rings. Thanks to Cole Billups for his expertise.
This episode of From A to Arbitration presents the closing arguments in a 2020 arbitration case concerning the falsification of letter carrier clock rings. Corey begins by thanking Cole Billups for technical assistance in preparing the episode's audio.
Corey details the case's background, emphasizing the importance of thorough case preparation. He highlights the significant role of his co-advocate, JB, and other witnesses in the case.
The episode focuses on the legal arguments presented during the closing. Corey critiques management's defense, specifically criticizing their argument that no carrier was harmed by the clock ring falsification. He challenges management's stance on the status quo ante and the perceived lack of punitive remedies, arguing instead that the harm caused to the entire carrier unit constitutes a significant factor in the arbitrator's decision.
The episode delves into Corey's strategy, outlining how he challenged management's arguments, emphasizing the importance of meticulous review of case files and contract language. This includes pointing out inconsistencies and omissions in management's presentation of the case.
Corey cites specific examples of arguments presented (e.g., management's claims that clock ring alterations were for training purposes). He analyzes the case from the perspective of the arbitrator, indicating what the arbitrator may have considered in reaching a decision.
Finally, the episode details the arbitrator's final decision, highlighting specific language used to understand the arbitrator's considerations. Walton emphasizes the importance of documenting management's violations. Corey's perspective throughout the episode is that union representatives need to proactively seek all available evidence and make compelling arguments based on the contract and relevant case law to challenge management. He then pivots to a discussion of upcoming episodes, previews future episodes, including a look at the "Act of God" grievance process and "hour office time" issues. The episode ends with a passionate and resolute call for a more militant approach by union members and leaders to challenge the status quo and advocate for letter carriers' rights.
http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/
View all episodes
By Corey L Walton
4.8
578578 ratings
This episode of From A to Arbitration presents the closing arguments in a 2020 arbitration case concerning the falsification of letter carrier clock rings. Corey begins by thanking Cole Billups for technical assistance in preparing the episode's audio.
Corey details the case's background, emphasizing the importance of thorough case preparation. He highlights the significant role of his co-advocate, JB, and other witnesses in the case.
The episode focuses on the legal arguments presented during the closing. Corey critiques management's defense, specifically criticizing their argument that no carrier was harmed by the clock ring falsification. He challenges management's stance on the status quo ante and the perceived lack of punitive remedies, arguing instead that the harm caused to the entire carrier unit constitutes a significant factor in the arbitrator's decision.
The episode delves into Corey's strategy, outlining how he challenged management's arguments, emphasizing the importance of meticulous review of case files and contract language. This includes pointing out inconsistencies and omissions in management's presentation of the case.
Corey cites specific examples of arguments presented (e.g., management's claims that clock ring alterations were for training purposes). He analyzes the case from the perspective of the arbitrator, indicating what the arbitrator may have considered in reaching a decision.
Finally, the episode details the arbitrator's final decision, highlighting specific language used to understand the arbitrator's considerations. Walton emphasizes the importance of documenting management's violations. Corey's perspective throughout the episode is that union representatives need to proactively seek all available evidence and make compelling arguments based on the contract and relevant case law to challenge management. He then pivots to a discussion of upcoming episodes, previews future episodes, including a look at the "Act of God" grievance process and "hour office time" issues. The episode ends with a passionate and resolute call for a more militant approach by union members and leaders to challenge the status quo and advocate for letter carriers' rights.
http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/
More shows like From A to Arbitration
View all
KILL TONY
5,734 Listeners
First Take
5,667 Listeners
Get Up
1,076 Listeners
The Comfort stop
16 Listeners
Fight Like Hell!
114 Listeners
United We Scan
105 Listeners
Classes of Mail
82 Listeners
NALC Branch 458
13 Listeners
Delivering Solidarity
22 Listeners
The Postal Stand-up
19 Listeners
Hot House with Richie Ray
18 Listeners
Next Generation Carriers
36 Listeners
The CCA Corner
6 Listeners
Parcels of Knowledge
16 Listeners
Caref4Prez
12 Listeners