
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Corey talks about Article 16.7: Emergency Placement. He emphasizes the importance of challenging emergency placements by filing grievances, highlighting four key areas of contention: immediacy (the action must be taken without delay), notification (the employee must be explicitly informed of the emergency placement), a detailed written charge, and the length of the placement (which cannot be indefinite). He supports his arguments with relevant arbitration cases and decisions, urging listeners to utilize this information to better defend themselves and their colleagues against potentially unjust actions by management.
C-10146 A&B: Defines what “immediate” is in cases of emergency placement.
C-24822: Determines the precedence and justification for emergency situations in a case where a carrier was put on emergency placement for not wearing a seatbelt - a situation that was not imminently dangerous.
C-30322: Shows that management failed to specify the reason for emergency placement in the charge.
C-32656: Highlights several instances where extended emergency placements were deemed improper.
By Corey L Walton4.8
578578 ratings
Corey talks about Article 16.7: Emergency Placement. He emphasizes the importance of challenging emergency placements by filing grievances, highlighting four key areas of contention: immediacy (the action must be taken without delay), notification (the employee must be explicitly informed of the emergency placement), a detailed written charge, and the length of the placement (which cannot be indefinite). He supports his arguments with relevant arbitration cases and decisions, urging listeners to utilize this information to better defend themselves and their colleagues against potentially unjust actions by management.
C-10146 A&B: Defines what “immediate” is in cases of emergency placement.
C-24822: Determines the precedence and justification for emergency situations in a case where a carrier was put on emergency placement for not wearing a seatbelt - a situation that was not imminently dangerous.
C-30322: Shows that management failed to specify the reason for emergency placement in the charge.
C-32656: Highlights several instances where extended emergency placements were deemed improper.

5,920 Listeners

5,673 Listeners

1,070 Listeners

18 Listeners

115 Listeners

101 Listeners

83 Listeners

14 Listeners

22 Listeners

19 Listeners

19 Listeners

42 Listeners

7 Listeners

25 Listeners

16 Listeners