
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Alexa moonlights as a guest and answers Yoel's questions about her recent paper, in which she argues that the criminal justice system should abandon retribution. Alexa claims that when we ask if someone is blameworthy, we are asking social scientific questions: Were they rational? Were they being coerced? Were they acting out of character? We discuss some aspects of the social scientific evidence - from vignettes about soaping windows to group-to-individual inference - and consider whether it can provide satisfying answers. And, Yoel challenges Alexa to consider whether her utopian vision might have unintended consequences.
Plus, we talk about Canadian truckers, and Alexa keeps her valentine's day collage shrouded in mystery.
Links:
By Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett4.5
155155 ratings
Alexa moonlights as a guest and answers Yoel's questions about her recent paper, in which she argues that the criminal justice system should abandon retribution. Alexa claims that when we ask if someone is blameworthy, we are asking social scientific questions: Were they rational? Were they being coerced? Were they acting out of character? We discuss some aspects of the social scientific evidence - from vignettes about soaping windows to group-to-individual inference - and consider whether it can provide satisfying answers. And, Yoel challenges Alexa to consider whether her utopian vision might have unintended consequences.
Plus, we talk about Canadian truckers, and Alexa keeps her valentine's day collage shrouded in mystery.
Links:

38,063 Listeners

6,814 Listeners

26,195 Listeners

9,237 Listeners

8,463 Listeners

2,673 Listeners

4,272 Listeners

836 Listeners

593 Listeners

4,170 Listeners

3,820 Listeners

5,532 Listeners

15,967 Listeners

3,489 Listeners

12 Listeners