Fiercely Independent

Fiercely Independent

Download on the App Store

Fiercely Independent episodes

  • Who Framed Roger Rogoff?

    Roger Rogoff was unanimously appointed by federal judges as Seattle’s top federal prosecutor. Before the hour was over, President Trump removed him.

    Was it a loyalty test? A judicial power grab? Neither explanation tells the full story.

    This episode examines the legal authority of the judges, the president’s power to remove temporary appointees, the Senate’s missing role, and the deeper failure to install a permanent, publicly accountable prosecutor.

    The law may allow the chaos. That does not make the chaos responsible governance.

    3 min
  • A $1.15 Trillion Loyalty Test?

    Congress is being asked to approve a record-setting $1.15 trillion defense bill before it has even authorized the war the money may support.

    What is the objective in Iran? What does victory look like? What is the exit strategy, and how much will this cost next year?

    Military funding should not become a test of patriotism or political loyalty. Congress has a constitutional responsibility to debate the war, define its purpose, explain its costs, and put every lawmaker on the record before approving another massive Pentagon budget.

    A trillion dollars can buy a lot, but it cannot buy loyalty or respect.

    #Congress #Iran #MilitarySpending #Pentagon #WarPowers #DefenseBudget #Politics #GovernmentSpending #FiercelyIndependent

    3 min
  • America Wants Global Power and Global Immunity

    The United States supports international law when it targets its enemies. But when the same legal system investigates Americans or U.S. allies, sovereignty suddenly becomes sacred.

    In this episode, Chris examines the administration’s attack on the International Criminal Court and the contradiction at the center of American foreign policy: claiming the power to enforce U.S. law around the world while rejecting outside scrutiny at home.

    You cannot demand global reach for American justice and global immunity from everyone else.

    Is this really about protecting American sovereignty, or creating a one-way legal system?

    Stay fierce. Stay independent.

    3 min
  • Spot the Spin: Correlation Is Not Causation

    Politicians are quick to claim credit when jobs are created, investment increases, or the economy appears to improve. But did their policy actually cause the result, or did the two things simply happen at the same time?

    In this week’s Spot the Spin, Chris examines the difference between causation and correlation using Toyota’s $3.6 billion San Antonio expansion and the claim that tariffs made it happen.

    Before accepting a political victory lap, ask three questions:

    1. Did the supposed cause happen before the outcome?
    2. Is there evidence explaining how one produced the other?
    3. Could another factor better explain what happened?

    Timing is not proof. Taking credit is not evidence. And correlation is not causation.

    Subscribe for more independent political analysis that helps you recognize weak arguments, misleading claims, and the spin hiding behind the headlines.

    3 min
  • The Election Watchdogs Are Gone. Now What?

    The bipartisan Election Assistance Commission has effectively been emptied just months before voters decide control of Congress.

    The commission does not count ballots or choose winners, but it helps set voting-system standards, certify equipment, and support election officials nationwide.

    So why remove the referees before the biggest political contest of the year?

    This could be about installing loyalists, pushing the SAVE Act through administrative power, or laying the groundwork to challenge the results if the election does not go their way.

    When the referees disappear before the game, everyone should pay attention.

    #Midterms #Election2026 #ElectionIntegrity #EAC #SAVEAct #VotingRights #Democracy #Politics #PoliticalNews #FiercelyIndependent

    3 min
  • Political Dog Whistles: What They Really Mean

    Politicians do not always say the ugly part out loud. Instead, they use coded language that sounds harmless to most people but sends a clear message to a specific audience.

    In this episode, we break down how political dog whistles work, why phrases like “law and order,” “welfare state,” and “globalists” can carry hidden meaning, and how plausible deniability protects the speaker from accountability. The real question is not always what was said, but who it was meant for.

    3 min
  • Is Chaos the Strategy?

    Iran, Greenland, and Spain may seem like separate stories, but together they point to a bigger question: is chaos being used as a political strategy?

    In this episode of Fiercely Independent, Chris breaks down the latest headlines involving Iran, threats toward Spain, Greenland’s strategic value, rare earth minerals, NATO tensions, and whether constant disruption strengthens America or weakens its alliances.

    Chaos may work in the short term, but over time allies adjust, rivals test limits, and noise starts replacing strategy.

    Stay fierce. Stay independent.

    3 min
  • Supreme Court Opens the Door to Even More Dark Money in Politics

    A recent Supreme Court ruling could reshape campaign spending by allowing political parties to spend more in direct coordination with their own candidates.

    Citizens United opened the door to unlimited independent political spending. This takes the influence of super PACs, dark money groups, and major donors one step further by making that spending more targeted, strategic, and connected to campaigns themselves.

    Is this free speech, or is it another step toward a government controlled by the highest bidder?

    Stay fierce. Stay independent.

    #DarkMoney #SupremeCourt #CitizensUnited #CampaignFinance #Politics

    3 min
  • Was the 2020 Election Stolen? Use Occam’s Razor to Spot the Spin

    Was the 2020 election stolen, or does that claim require too many unsupported assumptions?

    In this week’s Spot the Spin, Chris breaks down Occam’s Razor: a simple framework for evaluating competing explanations by asking which one relies on the fewest unsupported assumptions.

    Using the 2020 election as an example, he looks at what would need to be true for a coordinated fraud scheme to have changed the outcome across multiple key states, survived audits, recounts, court challenges, and public scrutiny without credible evidence emerging.

    Occam’s Razor does not mean the simplest answer is always correct. It means the explanation with the fewest unsupported assumptions is usually the one worth leaning toward.

    Stay fierce. Stay independent.

    8 min
  • America Turns 250 Tomorrow. Are We Better?

    As America approaches its 250th birthday, Chris looks back at the unity of the 1976 Bicentennial and asks what changed. We are richer, more diverse, and more advanced than ever, but are we losing the trust, truth, and civic responsibility that hold a democracy together?

    Independence is not just something we celebrate on July 4. It is something we have to practice every day.

    3 min

About Fiercely Independent

From the publisher's feed

Fiercely Independent is where politics, media, and culture get stripped of the performance. Hosted with a direct, independent voice, the show challenges partisan scripts, calls out hypocrisy on…