Subscribe now

Share

In 2020, the year society was locked down and basic constitutional rights of the entire US population were discarded, civil cases increased by more than 60%. In that year alone, there was an excess of lawsuits compared to prior years of over 180,000 cases:

John Beaudoin told me: "Did they hire 62% more people to handle those cases? No. Did everybody in the court system, all the judges and all the clerks, work 62 % more hours? Like 14 hours a day, every day for a year? No. There's only one way to do this: Dismiss, dismiss, dismiss."

And that is what happened: mass dismissals of civil lawsuits based on the standing doctrine. To have standing, the plaintiffs must prove harm from the action or conduct they're challenging. And one would think that this should be easy. It is anything but.

Beaudoin points to two rather recent landmark Supreme Court Cases that drastically raised the bar for plaintiffs to have sufficient standing so that their case would survive a motion to dismiss: Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal (2009).

According to Beaudoin, "Legal doctrines like Twombly and Iqbal let judges dismiss nearly any case if it's deemed implausible or lacking facts, no matter the injustice."

To get an idea how often SCOTUS referred to Twombly and Iqbal to dismiss cases, he gathered the numbers of case citations for all cases decided by the Supreme Court: "I gleaned these from Google Scholar. I've since checked it out at Westlaw. And although the numbers are different, they're proportional. So the graph would look exactly the same, but the bottom numbers would be like 380,000 instead of 300,000. But the others would go up, too, proportionally. So Westlaw is counting differently than Google Scholar."

Astonishingly, Twombly and Iqbal are the most quoted cases with almost 300,000 citations each. Despite the fact that these cases have only been around for about 16 years:

According to Beaudoin, both Twombly and iqbal "were used before COVID, but since COVID came, the courts use these two cases to blow everything out of the water."

And he continued: "I can prove that many of these cases were unrighteously dismissed, or I can prove that they used dismissal doctrines in the court and civil procedure to never hear the substance of these cases."

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution lists the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. That right, says Beaudoin, is the most foundational right for citizens to uphold and protect their other core rights like freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

But what's the value of a theoretical right to petition for a redress of grievances, if it's near to impossible to get standing, i.e. to have the court acknowledge that grievances did in fact happen to the plaintiff?

"If we can't get resolution in the courts, there's nowhere else to go. And the courts refuse to do their jobs," he says.

The question then is what happens to a society where the courts are not doing their job of dispute resolution. Where courts dismiss citizens' cases for even the most serious breaches of fundamental constitutional rights.

Beaudoin is convinced that as a consequence civil society starts breaking down: "You have people dividing into camps because the issues are not being settled or adjudicated. And so you leave it to society to fight amongst each other, fight on social media, fight in the streets. We're devolving as a civil society based on what's happened with these two cases and the way the courts are operating, extremely inefficiently dismissing righteous cases that should be heard."

But societal breakdown is not inevitable, he emphasizes, because the underlying cause is fixable: "What is the root cause where, if you change something, you can fix the whole system? One of the things that you can fix is standing doctrine and that would fix a lot in the United States."

And who should fix it? "John Roberts came in in 2005 as Chief Justice. Those cases I just showed you were two years after he got there and four years after he got there. He broke it. His court broke the system, so he's got to fix it. Or the United States will devolve into civil war."

CHAPTERS

0:00:00 Introduction and Overview of Graph Data

0:00:50 Explanation of Yearly Data Variation

0:01:09 Highlighting Significant Data Points

0:13:09 Standing Doctrine

0:13:32 Further Analysis of Legal Standing and Case Dismissals

0:14:29 Critique of Judicial System and Focus on Courts

0:18:40 Why The PREP Act Is Unconstitutional

0:20:00 Beaudoin's Petition to the Supreme Court

0:22:19 Root Cause Analysis and Call for Judicial Reform

RESOURCES

Beaudoin's Substack: The Real CdC's Newsletter

Subscribe now

Share

"Massachusetts has been committing fraud as a matter of custom and practice every single day when they write COVID on death records when it's not COVID and omit the vaccine as a cause of death, when they know it's the vaccine," John Beaudoin told me.

It's not just Massachusetts or other U.S. states that are manipulating death certificate data. According to Beaudoin, the CDC stopped using the proper ICD (Internal Classification of Diseases) code to classify deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccinations.

Systems engineer John Beaudoin succeeded in obtaining all official Massachusetts death records from 2015 through 2024: "I was going to the gym one morning and I heard that a seven year old girl, Cassidy Baracka, died from COVID in January of 2022. I thought to myself that there's no way a healthy seven year old girl dies from COVID. Doesn't happen. It hasn't happened. Not a single time. And so I asked for her death record."

Massachusetts, where Beaudoin lives, is one of the very few states in America that allows unrestricted public access to death certificates. Nonetheless, his request was denied: "They wouldn't give Cassidy's death certificate to me. I did eight different public records requests for all kinds of stuff. I ran them through other people, so that my name wouldn't be on all of them."

Massachusetts refused all his public record requests except the one where he asked for ALL of the state's death records from 2015: "Only one of my eight requests came through. And it was the one that asked for all the death records from 2015 … I was kind of scared. Did they give these to me by accident? Are they going to take them away?"

Beaudoin then cross-referenced the Massachusetts death records with VAERS data and uncovered widespread data fraud. According to his findings, the CDC stopped coding deaths related to Covid-19 vaccinations with the appropriate ICD codes. In addition, he uncovered plenty of evidence that doctors and medical examiners in Massachusetts issued fraudulent death certificates, labelling Covid shot deaths and other non-Covid deaths as Covid deaths.

Although physicians and medical examiners fill out death certificates, they are not authorized to add the ICD code that corresponds to the cause of death. This is the job of a central federal agency, the CDC.

Therefore, all states must send all their death certificates to a central parsing system run by the CDC: "They have two software programs called Transax and ACME. And those two programs read the words, they parse the words, and they spit out codes."

There is an ICD code for Covid shot deaths: U12.9. However, this code is apparently hardly ever used by the CDC. Instead, the CDC codes Covid shots as Y59.0, a code that encompasses all 'viral vaccines.'

Beaudoin told me: "U12.9 means Covid-19 vaccine specifically. It's not used on death records. There are notations in the literature of England and Germany where there's an asterisk under U12.9 and it says that it's not really used much and it's a subcategory of Y59.0."

After the CDC codes the death certificates, they are sent back to the states. And that's how Beaudoin was able to check whether the ICD codes corresponded to the cause of death written on the death certificates by physicians and medical examiners. He said: "I'm betting that the software actually spit out the Y59.0. And on some it went through, but on others they deleted it and they sent it back to the States without the Y59.0. Somebody I believe at the CDC has been deleting Y59.0."

Later, when he also got access to death certificates in Connecticut and Minnesota, states where death records are also public, he discovered the same phenomenon: "The first one in Connecticut is coded. The next three in Connecticut, not coded … So you have three states [Massachusetts, Connecticut, Minnesota] in which the first one's coded, the rest aren't. They stopped coding them. Why? They're hiding the vaccine deaths from the American people."

When Beaudoin examined the ICD-coded death data for the entire United States using the CDC's WONDER Multiple Cause of Death database, he found fewer than 300 deaths coded under Y59.0 for all the years following the onset of COVID-19:

CHAPTERS

0:00:00 John's Childhood Hearing Loss & the 1968 Hong Kong Flu

0:04:33 Early Life Memories and Academic Background

0:05:12 Analyzing CDC Data and Losing Trust

0:09:56 Lawsuit Over Mask Mandate and Experiences with Exemptions

0:12:26 Facing Public Pushback Over Mask Exemption

0:16:21 Strategy Against Mask Policies and Exception Details

0:21:15 Entering Data Analysis and Legal Battles Post-Law School

0:24:54 Obtaining Massachusetts Death Records and First Discoveries

0:29:37 Vaccine Reactions and The Cassidy Case

0:35:40 Death Certificate Certifiers and Patterns in Data

0:40:07 Financial Incentives Driving Hospital COVID Diagnoses

0:47:39 How Evidence-Based Medicine and Coding Changed Healthcare

0:52:17 Doctor-Patient Relationship in the Age of Electronic Records

0:57:13 Investigating Young Vaccine-Related Deaths

1:01:02 Media Suppression and the Cascade of Preventable Tragedies

1:07:44 ICD Codes, Centralization, and CDC Manipulation

1:18:12 Decentralized Coding Practices and Data Errors

1:23:08 Government Censorship and Social Media Control

1:29:14 Professional Threats to Doctors and Board Certifications

RESOURCES

Beaudoin's Substack: The Real CdC's Newsletter

Subscribe now

Share

Dr. Joseph Sansone: "People need to really get what I'm saying: Most people that you know will die from these injections."

The debate must shift from arguing about mRNA Covid shot mandates and "recommendations" to arguing that these shots are biological weapons of mass destruction, Sansone says: "You can't win by arguing mandates. So you have to take a stake and go right into the vampire's heart. These are weapons of mass destruction."

Sansone argues that mRNA injections are already illegal according to existing bioweapon laws and existing weapons of mass destruction laws because it is widely known that the shots are causing carnage among the population: "You're shortening lifespans, you're reducing birth rates … These injections cause neurological problems, heart problems, cancers, and so on. They're associated with increased infant mortality and fertility problems … If you're a 35 year old man or woman and you got this injection and you only live to be 63 instead of 80, they just stole 17 years of your life."

Knowing about the harmfulness of the shots, he says, meets the knowingness standard of intent and this creates a criminal and civil liability for anyone having anything to do with the shots.

Sansone not only talks the walk but walks the walk: "The court system needs to get flooded with cases. Go think back into the 50s and 60s with all the civil rights cases. They filed case after case after case after case." And that's exactly what he has been doing since early 2023 when he introduced his first 'Ban the Jab' resolution in Lee County, Florida.

The resolution declared COVID‑19 and mRNA injections "biological and technological weapons of mass destruction" and called on Governor Ron DeSantis and the Attorney General to ban the Covid shots in Florida. The late Dr. Francis Boyle, main author of the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti‑Terrorism Act, endorsed his resolution.

In 2024, Sansone filed a lawsuit, a so-called writ of mandamus, against Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody in the Florida Supreme Court. His goal is to force the Governor to prohibit the Covid-19 mRNA shots in Florida.

Subsequently, he drafted the "Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act" which criminalizes the manufacturing, distribution, and possession of any products that make use of mRNA technology. In April this year, several Republican representatives in the Minnesota legislature were the first ones nationwide to introduce his bill.

Sansone is asking Americans to get his mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act introduced in many more states: "You go find someone who might have the courage to do it and get it introduced because one, it's going to make a splash, even with all the censorship, it's going to get out there and people's heads will spin. This gets introduced in places like New Jersey, New York or California, their heads are going to spin. They're not going to know how to handle that … Let's say we can get this introduced in like a dozen or 15 states. A lot of states don't come back in a session until January. But let's say we can get this introduced in a bunch of states. The writing is going to be on the wall … Eventually the mRNA shots are going to get prohibited in the whole country or we're going to have a revolution."

Why has it taken more than 2 years from his first 'Ban the Jab' resolution to having the mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act introduced in the first state?

He says: "The reason we're not where we should be is because when I did that first 'Ban the Jab'resolution, I got as much pushback from 'our' side as I did from the other side and most of the people in the alternative media are still censoring what I and other people like me have been doing because they don't want to admit these are weapons because they're either afraid of losing access or being canceled."

Those who could stop the shots - the President, the head of the FDA, state governors, district attorneys, prosecutors,sheriffs - are not doing it: "These people are either complicit or looking the other way which makes them complicit in biological warfare against the American people … They could literally change the course of human history, but that would require a little courage. These people are afraid."

We also talk about the Dutch law case brought by several Dutch citizens harmed by the mRNA shots and the unexplained arrest of Arno van Kessel, one of the lawyers that are representing them. The plaintiffs are suing, among others, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, the former Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte as well as the entire Dutch government.

CHAPTERS

0:00:17 Clinical Hypnosis Background and Susceptibility

0:01:41 Intelligence, Authority, and Brainwashing

0:04:46 COVID-19 Injections as Bioweapons: Early Awareness and Legal Context

0:09:01 Legal Challenges: Mandamus Case and Procedural Issues

0:16:02 Health Impacts, Shedding, and Filing Appeals

0:22:48 Role of Public Health Officials and Political Responses

0:36:30 Drafting and Promoting Bio-Weapons Prohibition Legislation

0:41:38 Provisions and Implications of the Proposed Law

0:46:27 Overcoming Legal Barriers and Grassroots Advocacy

0:54:54 Scientific Support, Public Perception, and Broader Vaccine Debates

1:02:14 Francis Boyle's Expertise, Affidavit, and His Passing

1:08:16 The Dutch Lawsuit Against Bill Gates

1:12:45 Legal Risks, Arrest of Lawyer Arno van Kessel

1:18:14 Trump, Pfizer Deal, and Political Disappointment

RESOURCES

Mind Matters and Everything Else with Dr. Joseph Sansone I Am Going To War! Will You Join Me? 50 Different State Versions of the 'Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act'. Mind Matters and Everything Else with Dr. Joseph Sansone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber… Read more 8 months ago · 264 likes · 98 comments · Dr. Joseph Sansone

Subscribe now

Share

To my English speaking viewers: I will release the interview with English voiceover in a little while. Or you can watch it on YouTube with English subtitles turned on:

***

Wieso lief die Inszenierung der Covid-19 Pandemie so reibungslos ab in der EU - ganz so wie in den USA, Kanada, Australien und anderen Ländern? Es war, als wäre das alles schon vorher geprobt und einstudiert worden.

Pierre Obertin, Autor des Substacks "Expressis Verbis", sagte mir während unseres Interviews: "Die Sache war schon irgendwie am Laufen. Da ging es eigentlich nur noch darum, das irgendwie zu koordinieren. Und da gab es dann halt auch, wie wir jetzt erfahren haben, Kommunikationswege: da war schon geplant, wie das ablaufen sollte."

Obertin schreibt seit 2021 über die Covid Pandemie und hinterfragt das der Weltbevölkerung vorgeschriebene offizielle Narrativ.

Er ist Luxemburger und lebt in Luxemburg. An der Technischen Universität in Kaiserslautern hat er seinen Masters Degree in angewandter Mathematik gemacht und momentan arbeitet er als Informatiklehrer.

Warum gab - und gibt es - ein weltweites Rahmenwerk, das wie ein gut geöltes Uhrwerk alle Räder, Federn und Regler bereits am richtigen Platz hatte, als im Januar 2020 der Anpfiff kam?

Ganz einfach: weil das Machtspiel bühnenreif war. Weil die entscheidungsbefugten Institutionen und deren Vertreter aus den "Fehlern" der anderen nicht ganz so glatt abgelaufenen Pandemien, wie der Schweinegrippe, gelernt hatten. Weil es zig mal geprobt worden war: in den USA (Dark Winter, Atlantic Storm, CLADE X, Event 201) wie in der EU. Generalprobe für die EU war "Blue Orchid" im Februar 2019.

In unserem Interview beschreibt Pierre die Strukturen innerhalb der EU, die über die letzten Jahrzehnte für die ganz großen geplanten Machtspiele aufgebaut und getestet wurden - wie eben die Pandemiekrise. Obertin: "Corona kam ja nicht von heute auf morgen. Das ging eigentlich schon los in den 90er Jahren. Nach dem Ende des Kalten Krieges musste irgendwie was Neues kommen. Und dann ging es ja auch los in den 90er Jahren mit dem Klima. Das Thema Klima kam und eben auch das andere Thema: ansteckende Krankheiten. Die sollten wieder kommen."

Bei der Schweinegrippe 2010, da klappte es noch nicht so ganz. Aber zehn Jahre später war es dann soweit: Vorhang auf für Corona. Und die Rolle der Bevölkerung? Zuschauen, Eintauchen in das Märchen, "dispense disbelief", Beifall klatschen und immer wieder den Arm hinhalten für regelmäßige "Schutzspritzen."

Dass es hier im Namen der "Gesundheitssicherheit" in Wirklichkeit um die Entmachtung der eigenen Bevölkerung ging, das war 2020 vielen nicht klar.

Beim zweitenmal wird es wohl nicht ganz so glatt über die Bühne gehen.

KAPITEL

[00:00] Einführung, Vorstellung von Pierre und Thema des Interviews

[00:44] Pierre über seine Artikel, beruflicher Hintergrund und Covid-Fokus

[01:56] Warum waren die EU-Krisenreaktionen so einheitlich?

[04:04] Historische Entwicklung des EU-Gesundheitsrahmens seit den 1990ern

[06:50] Schweinegrippe als Vorlauf und EU-Krisendokumente

[09:27] Wissenschaft und Krisenkommunikation: Wer entscheidet?

[13:13] Militär und Security Services: Ausnahmezustand und EU-Koordination

[15:09] Pandemiepläne, der Einfluss des Imperial College London

[19:36] Die Voraussagen und Publikationen zur Pandemie

[21:11] Epidemie-Definitionen und erste Covid-Entwicklungen in Europa

[22:37] Lockdown until vaccine: Rolle der Impfstoffentwicklung

[25:51] Medizinische Versorgung, Remdesivir und Kontrollpolitik

[28:56] Politische Struktur der EU: Von der Leyen und Kommissions-Mechanismen

[31:14] Ursula von der Leyen und Berateraffäre

[32:26] Gemeinsamer Impfstoffeinkauf und parlamentarische Machtlosigkeit

[34:46] Entscheidungsstrukturen und Einfluss einzelner Kommissare

[37:12] Stella Kyriakides: Verantwortung für Health and Food Safety

[38:31] EMA, Zulassungsdruck und Skandal-Dokumente

[42:55] DG Health, Unterbehörden, Kernfunktionen der Pandemiepolitik

[45:58] EU Advisory Panel: Zusammensetzung und Einfluss

[51:16] Interessen, Gain of Function und Vernetzungen im Panel

[57:03] Entscheidungsträger und Machtverhältnisse im Panel

[01:00:02] Panel-Meetings ab März 2020 und Schulschließungen

[01:04:47] Rolle des ECDC und Umsetzung politischer Entscheidungen als "Wissenschaft"

[01:11:32] Italien als Lockdown-Testfall

[01:12:46] Kontrolle des Narrativs, Angst vor Widerstand der Bevölkerung

[01:15:23] Lockdown-Beschlüsse, Exit-Strategien und "Lines to take"-Dokumente

[01:16:25] EU-Rahmen für Lockdowns und Einfluss auf Einzelstaaten

[01:33:48] Autoritäre Kommunikationsmechanismen, "Lines to Take"

[01:39:52] mRNA-Impfungen: Übersterblichkeit und gesellschaftliche Folgen

[01:41:18] Gesellschaftliche Stimmung und Impfkritik in Europa

[01:43:06] Ausblick: Digitale ID, Global Public Private Partnerships

[01:44:21] Fazit und Abschied

RESOURCEN:

• Pierre Obertin "Geliefert wie bestellt: Lockdown & Co."

• Pierre Obertin: Geheime E-Mails aus Stockholm

• Cees van den Bos: Corona-Politik von der Europäischen Kommission festgelegt

• "Profiteure der Angst" ARTE/NDR Dokumentation 2009

• Anfrage AsktheEU.org von Sergio Pérez Sangiao

• List of authorities represented in the Health Security Committee. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. European Commission.

• Crisis communication - HSC Communicators' network. Directorate-General Health and Consumer Protection (SANCO), 2010.

• ECDC lines-to-take: Novel coronavirus, China, 2019-nCoV. Last update: 21 January 2020, Ursprüngliche URL

• Global Health Security Initiative - 10 years of collaborative action. 2011.

Subscribe now

Share

Albert Benavides, the creator of VAERSAware.com, told me: "Of those 200 official dead kids that are officially in there [VAERS], there's actually 600 dead kids, but you don't see them because the age field is not populated."

Surprisingly, age is not a required field when submitting a report to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the database managed by the CDC and FDA to track vaccine-related injuries and deaths. In fact, hardly any fields on the VAERS form are mandatory.

Albert explains: "And yet, the age is properly documented in the summary narrative. More than 400 of these actual dead kids are sitting in a bucket of unknown ages."

Those 400 reports are still in the system, but without an age attached, they aren't counted in the official total for children's deaths. That's how VAERS ended up concealing the deaths of 400 children who died after the mRNA shots.

Albert uncovered this information through meticulous analysis of VAERS data, by reviewing individual reports, and extracting details from the summary narratives. Through this effort, he estimates that the actual number of child deaths linked to mRNA COVID-19 shots is closer to 600, rather than the officially reported 200.

However, even that figure may fall short of the true total. VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on voluntary reporting. As a result, the actual number of vaccine-related injuries and deaths is uncertain.

A 2011 Harvard report found that fewer than 1% of all adverse events are reported to VAERS. However, deaths occurring shortly after vaccination are likely to be reported at a higher rate, though the exact percentage remains unknown. For deaths that occur longer after vaccination, the likelihood of reporting is probably much lower, suggesting an even greater degree of underreporting.

Another disturbing 'feature' of VAERS is that a significant number of valid reports are never made publicly available through the CDC's WONDER system, and many reports are later removed. React19, a Covid-19 vaccine injury support group, discovered during a 2022 audit that 1 out of 3 adverse event reports submitted to VAERS by their members were never published.

As data analyst Albert Benavides puts it: "It almost makes everything else a moot point if we know that we're basically analyzing curated data and that VAERS basically does not publish all legitimate reports received."

The issue isn't simply system failure - it raises the concern that the system may deliberately be structured in a way to conceal the full scope of vaccine-related injuries and deaths.

HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy is well aware of the problem. During the interview, Albert recounts how Kennedy came to speak at Albert's church in San Jose, California:

"On June 19, 2021, Bobby came to our church. And he's only said it once. I've never heard him say it again. The week before he had met with a group of various CDC adjudicators who came to him as a group and collectively told him that 150,000 reports had disappeared from their queues. And these were all reports that they were working on to adjudicate, to finalize and publish. This is in line with what we're saying that React 19 has people that have published reports and that have never been published. And I have submitted reports that have never been published."

The VAERS/CDC adjudicators who came to Robert Kennedy in 2022 to alert him to the 150,000 disappeared reports: who are they? Who made the reports disappear from VAERS? Who gave the order to make them disappear?

We do not know.

CHAPTERS

0:00:00 Introduction, President's Vaccine Statement, and Letter Plans

0:02:27 Albert Joins and Overview of VAERS Data Analysis

0:05:31 Explanation of React19 and VAERS Report Issues

0:08:51 Deleted and Missing VAERS Reports: Causes and Concerns

0:12:46 Public Visibility and Permanent IDs in VAERS

0:17:34 Underreporting and Hidden Data in VAERS

0:19:46 VAERS adjudicators Tell RFK that 150,000 Reports Disappeared

0:23:13 Temporary vs. Final ID Numbers and Data Discrepancies

0:31:33 VAERSaware Dashboard: Data Overview and Demonstration

0:36:11 Age and State Data Issues in VAERS Reports

0:43:42 Dashboard Features: Gender, Lot Numbers, and Toxic Batches

0:48:50 Lot Sizes, Shipments, and Data Limitations

0:52:45 Data Lags and Delays in Report Publication

0:55:13 Missing Data and Adjudication Problems

1:02:53 What Should Happen to VAERS: Albert's Ideas

RESOURCES

• VAERSAware

• FDA Conducting 'Intense Investigation' of Child Deaths Following COVID Shot

Subscribe now

Share

In the concluding part of my interview with Jacob Nordangard, we continue to explore the dystopian future that self-appointed 'Global Leaders' are planning for the rest of us.

A White Paper titled 'The Agentic State', published by the Global Government Technology Center Berlin (GGTC Berlin) in May of 2025, lays out a future in which AI agents take control of all functions of government.

Luukas Ilves is the lead author of the White Paper. He's also advisor to Ukraine's Deputy Prime Minister, son of Estonia's former President, former Chief Information officer of Estonia and one of WEF's Young Global Leaders.

In the White Paper, Ilves describes various features of Agentic AI Governance; he pictures a future where laws will become 'living laws' that AI agents can change at any time. Legislators won't be needed anymore, humans will be monitored continuously, and compliance with regulation is enforced around the clock.

'Polycrises' will be met with a 'Hyper-aware AI-orchestrated first response': "When a crisis begins to unfold, AI initiates the first steps in crisis response before human-in-the-loop structures have time to react."

Moreover, such AI agents "will work alongside increasingly autonomous physical systems such as drones and robots, forming the backbone of a responsive, adaptive crisis infrastructure."

"Human-in-the-loop structures" will eventually disappear completely from the governing loop. And AI agents will closely observe and manipulate the emotions of its 'out-of-the-loop' humans.

That's the vision that the WEF and the Global Government Technology Center Berlin are hoping to realize for billions of people. To reach this goal, Luukas Ilves calls for a "new leadership archetype for the agentic AI era."

It stands to reason that Ilves might consider himself as the embodiment of this new leadership archetype. He has political ambitions and already ran, albeit unsuccessfully, for the European Parliament.

CHAPTERS

05:52 Exploring the Agentic State and Its Implications

08:38 The Role of Young Global Leaders in Governance

11:31 Deep Dive into the White Paper's Key Concepts

13:37 Agentic Internal Workflows and Their Consequences

16:12 Outcome-Based Governance and Its Risks

19:21 The Dangers of AI in Bureaucratic Systems

22:07 Corruption and AI: A Systemic Issue

25:18 The Future of Human Involvement in Governance

28:02 Crisis Response and Resilience in Governance

36:01 The Power of Panic: Control Through Fear

36:49 Singleton Theory: A Centralized Power Structure

40:19 Simulations and Reality: Testing Crisis Responses

43:12 AI in Crisis Management: The Rise of Autonomous Systems

47:08 Surveillance and Compliance: The New Normal

49:03 The Future of Governance: Living Laws and AI

53:57 Ethics and Compliance: The Tyranny of Agentic Systems

01:11:05 The United Nations and Global Goals

01:13:55 Agentic Policymaking and Democracy

01:19:15 Emotion Detection and Citizen Signals

01:24:54 Leadership in the Age of AI

01:30:18 The Dystopian Future of Governance

01:44:29 Awareness and Resistance Against the Agenda

Subscribe now

Share

UNRWA. An impossible to pronounce acronym, one of the many United Nations' agencies, is not the worst place to start gaining some understanding of the current situation in Gaza, Israel and beyond.

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency was founded in 1949 as a temporary organization to provide emergency relief to Palestine refugees who had fled their homes in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.

But almost 80 years later, it's still around. How did this happen and why?

Today, UNRWA is the largest UN Agency by staff size: it employs about 30,000 people, almost all of whom are locally recruited Palestinian refugees themselves. The majority of them work in Gaza and many others live and work in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and the West Bank.

Palestinian Arabs are the only group in the world with a dedicated UN agency. An initial roughly 700,000 Palestinian refugees in 1949 turned into almost 6 million refugees today since the refugee status is passed on from father to child. Who profits from this - not just in terms of money but in terms of political power?

In the interview, Karys Rhea, a fellow of the Middle East Forum, talks to me about the history and purpose of UNRWA and discusses the historical background of the Arab-Israeli conflict, the establishment of Israel, and the roots of Arab opposition to Jewish sovereignty.

CHAPTER TITLES

03:50 Why UNRWA Was Created: The 1948 Refugee Crisis 07:18 Partition History, British Mandate, and Early Conflict 11:11 Jewish Migration: Russian Pogroms and Ottoman Era 12:16 UN Partition, Arab Opposition, and the Independence War 14:58 Israel's Survival Against the Odds 15:53 Jewish Presence, Arab Reaction, and Sovereignty 17:34 Holocaust Impact and Pan-Arabism 23:46 Haj Amin al-Husseini, Hitler, and Early Massacres 26:39 War Aftermath, Armistice, and Territorial Shifts 28:20 Jewish and Arab Populations: Parallel Refugee Crises 30:39 Arab States: Refugees as Political Pawns 34:06 Citizenship and Refugee Treatment in Arab States 38:42 Propaganda, Radicalization, and Generational Issues 39:21 UNRWA's Role in Perpetuating the Conflict 40:17 Inheritance of Refugee Status 42:08 UNRWA Staffing, Budget, Scope 43:35 When Does Refugee Status End? Right of Return Debates 48:29 Refugee Numbers: Demographics and Registration 51:17 How Definitions and Populations Changed Over Time 53:16 Citizenship and Second-Class Status 56:40 Israeli Arabs: Rights, Integration, and Social Mobility 1:00:53 UNRWA's Funding, Donors, and Accountability 1:03:11 Refugee Camps Today: Living Conditions 1:06:44 UNRWA Services and Lack of Oversight 1:10:13 Employment, Corruption, and Organizational Interests 1:13:03 Daily Life: Wealth, Poverty, and Lack of Rights 1:15:07 Identity Formation and Psychological Impact 1:17:34 Yasser Arafat, the Palestinian Identity, and Nationalism 1:24:57 Education, Hate, and Indoctrination in Schools 1:27:52 Personal Contact, Worker Permits, and The Green Prince 1:29:29 Indoctrination: Martyrdom and the UNRWA Curriculum

RESOURCES

• Total Palestinian Refugees (1950-Present)

• Population of Israel (1948-Present)

Subscribe now

Share

Congress hasn't yet voted on the Interior Environment Appropriations Bill for 2026 and there is still time to call your House Representative and urge them to vote against the bill.

There are at least two toxic riders hiding in the bill that demonstrate the enormous influence that the pesticide and sewage sludge industry has in Congress.

Both bill riders are clearly anti-MAHA and designed to protect industry: Section 453 hands pesticide manufacturers something akin to a pesticide liability shield whereas section 407 orders the EPA to NOT finalize their draft report on the toxicity of sewage sludge.

Dr. Nass: "Glyphosate's name is not in this [section 453] rider. This rider applies to all pesticides. There are 57,000 different formulations of pesticides that have been registered by the EPA. It would apply to all of them. And if it really did shield them from liability, we can virtually be assured that they will make their products more sloppily and that more dangerous products are likely to come on the market."

Glyphosate hasn't had a proper review in 32 years. Dr. Nass told me: "There had been a draft report on glyphosate, and it was not done well. Was very sloppy. And so the courts sent it back to the EPA to be redone. And so the last finalized assessment of glyphosate was actually in 1993. So we're talking about 32 years ago."

Sewage sludge, also known as 'biosolids', contains PFAS, so-called forever chemicals because they are extremely persistent. Chemists haven't yet found a way to break these harmful chemicals down into harmless substances. And, for over 35 years, huge amounts of this sewage sludge have been sprayed as fertilizer on fields.

Do we know how toxic sewage sludge it? Not really. Do we know how many toxic chemicals it contains? And what the upper limit of these chemicals should be? We don't know this because the EPA is not measuring many of the toxic chemicals that are hiding in sewage sludge.

And now Congress is ordering the EPA to stand down and leave its draft report regarding PFAS in sewage sludge unfinished.

Meryl Nass: "Our leaders are not informing us of the truth. They are telling us the narrative that they've been told to give us. And if they don't do that, they lose their jobs. And keeping their job is more important than telling the truth."

CHAPTERS

01:56 Interior Environment Appropriations Bill 2026

02:54 Explanation of Riders

05:11 Sneaking Riders into Bills

08:25 Bayer's Acquisition of Monsanto

14:58 Analysis of Section 453

19:42 Examination of FIFRA

23:11 Urgent Label Changes and EPA Capture

24:42 Pesticide and Sewage Sludge Concerns

1:07:19 EPA Regulations on Toxins in Sewage Sludge and Farmland Use

1:08:28 Biosolids Industry

1:09:11 Congressional Mandate for PFAS Risk Assessment

1:11:22 EPA Draft Report on PFAS in Sludge

1:13:17 Persistence of Forever Chemicals

1:14:14 Lack of Public Awareness

1:15:23 Environmental Impacts of Sludge Application

1:16:15 Biosolids Industry Lobbying

1:17:16 Loopholes in State Bans

1:19:16 Suppressing Risk Assessments

1:20:18 Call to Action Against Riders

1:23:27 Broader Concerns on Chemicals

RESOURCES

Interior Environment Appropriations Bill 2026

Meryl's CHAOS letter (Critical Health Analysis and OpinionS) A quick summary of the Sludge rider, which is present in both House and Senate versions Section 507: A Bill Rider Designed to Stop Federal Regulation of Forever Chemicals in Sewage Sludge, Must be Rejected… Read more 4 months ago · 77 likes · 16 comments · Meryl Nass Meryl's CHAOS letter (Critical Health Analysis and OpinionS) A quick summary on the Pesticide liability shield, which is likely to come up for a vote this week or next Section 453: A Bill to Restrict Pesticide Warnings Must Be Rejected… Read more 4 months ago · 69 likes · 8 comments · Meryl Nass

Subscribe now

Share

Welcome to a totalitarian hellhole so horrific that even George Orwell would be impressed.

In the second part of my interview with Jacob Nordangård, we start to dissect the recently published White Paper "The Agentic State: How Agentic AI Will Revamp 10 Functional Layers of Government and Public Administration."

This White Paper was released in May 2025 by the Global Government Technology Center Berlin (GGTC Berlin). Its lead author is Luukas Ilves, Advisor to the Deputy Prime Minister of Ukraine and former Chief Information Officer of Estonia. He's also the son of the former President of Estonia, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, and a Young Global Leader at the World Economic Forum.

The GGTC Berlin is a joint initiative between the World Economic Forum and GovTech Campus Deutschland. CapGemini is a founding member, and the United Arab Emirates serves as a founding partner.

Jacob and I go over the most disturbing sections of the White Paper to understand what kind of dystopian future our Globalist Gang is planning for us. As Luukas Ilves makes clear in the introduction, the change in governance they are envisioning is nothing short of revolutionary.

Ilves writes: "The rise of agentic AI will have a particularly profound impact on government… Previous rounds of digital transformation… have not altered the fundamental organizational structure or business model of government. Agentic AI's software will be capable of 'eating' the core functions of government. The Agentic State… marks a shift in the nature of government."

Here are some characteristics of the Agentic State:

• ALL personal data will be 'stitched' together with public data to provide total insights into everyone everywhere.

• Simulations are deemed "critical public infrastructure": Crisis Simulations will be running constantly to achieve "AI-enabled national resilience."

• Engineered 'polycrises' will be tackled by AI agents that "will work alongside increasingly autonomous physical systems such as drones and robots, forming the backbone of a responsive, adaptive crisis infrastructure."

• Law and Order will be wiped out and replaced with "Law as Code": The agentic government will "rewrite laws as easily as agents rewrite code." And rules will be "retuned continuously" based on '"feedback loops."

• Citizens' compliance with "living laws" is checked in real-time all the time. Compliance will no longer need to be enforced since it's going to be 'encoded' in the agentic state system.

CHAPTERS

00:27 Defining the Agentic State

02:31 Global GovTech Framework

04:27 UN as Strategic Partner of WEF

06:29 Ukraine as Testing Ground for Digital Tech

08:20 WEF Influence in Ukraine

10:19 Young Global Leaders

13:29 Global Government Technology Center Berlin & Kiev

14:40 Public-Private Partnerships

18:45 World Bank GovTech Program & Its AI Working Group

28:36 Defining Agentic AI

35:55 Citizen-Government Relationships

46:01 Swedish Government and Bank ID System

48:16 The Wallenberg Family Influence in Sweden

58:49 White Paper: Executive Summary and Layers

1:20:20 White Paper Limitations & Omissions

1:23:27 Crisis Response and Resilience

1:24:26 Polycrisis and Threats

1:26:03 Global Politics and Manufactured Enemies

1:27:44 Historical Tech Transfer to China

1:29:21 Fabricating Crises for Control

1:30:13 Agentic Systems in Crisis Management

1:31:22 UN's Pact for the Future

1:33:13 Global Digital Compact

1:38:47 Digital World Brain

1:40:09 Simulations As Critical Public Infrastructure

1:41:23 The Singleton AI Concept

1:43:49 AI-Orchestrated Crisis Response

1:45:43 Humans in the Loop vs. On the Loop

1:48:26 Mad Scientist Analogy

RESOURCES

• Welcome to Your Nightmare: The Externalization of the Agentic State

• Download 'The Agentic State' white paper from here: https://www.globalgovtechcentre.org/about-whitepaper

• A Primer on the Evolution and Impact of AI Agents | World Economic Forum

• Global GovTech Board debuts at WEF 2025, driving the future of digital governance ⋆ IT Logs

• GovTech Intelligence Hub - GovTech Briefing: The Agentic State

• Berlin Global GovTech Centre

• Executive Summary - Berlin Global GovTech Centre

• Digital public infrastructure | United Nations Development Programme

Subscribe now

Share

Have you ever wondered how the global elite plans to use AI in order to accomplish its mission of a global government?

Jacob Nordangård, author of The Global Coup d'Etat, recently uncovered a revealing white paper by the Global Government Technology Center Berlin (GGCT Berlin) which sheds light on this very question.

Titled "The Agentic State: How Agentic AI Will Revamp 10 Functional Layers of Government", the document was initially published by the GGTC in May of 2025. Its lead author, Luukas Ilves, formerly served as Chief Information Officer for the Estonian government and now advises Ukraine's Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Digital Transformation.

The Global Government Technology Center Berlin was cofounded in December of 2024 as one of many foundational initiatives aimed at establishing a new system of Agentic AI governance.

In my interview with Jacob, we discuss the rapidly expanding GovTech infrastructure that the global elite has been developing over the last years to lay the foundation required to transform traditional governments into globally controlled "Agentic States."

These Agentic States represent a fundamental departure from conventional systems of governance. According to plans proposed by the UN and World Economic Forum, states are expected to evolve into AI-driven systems, standardized across nations, that operate with minimal to no human involvement in decision making and policy formation.

Luukas Ilves writes in the GGTC's white paper: "The rise of agentic AI will have a particularly profound impact on government and public services… Previous rounds of digital transformation have altered the medium by government functions… but have not altered the fundamental organisational structure or business model of government.

And he continues: "This time will be different. Agentic AI's software will be capable of 'eating' the core functions of government. The Agentic State… marks a shift in the nature of government."

CHAPTERS

01:26 Overview of GovTech Organizations

07:06 Nordangard's "Welcome to Your Nightmare" Article

14:52 World Economic Forum and Fourth Industrial Revolution Centers

17:24 Global Government Technology Center (GGTC) Berlin and Kiev

19:07 Implications of Technological Transformation and AI-Governed Societies

23:17 White Paper: Versions, Feedback Loops, and Hegelian Parallels

27:30 Ethical Boundaries, Nudging, and UN Agenda

30:57 Crisis Management and Virtual Twins

33:09 Human "In the Loop" vs. "On the Loop" in AI Decision-Making

33:59 Global Networking: National GovTech Ecosystems and Global Control

35:28 The UN Pact for the Future and the Global Digital Compact

48:27 GovTech Intelligence Hub

56:33 Ukraine's Testbed Role and its Ministry of Digital Transformation

59:25 Luukas Ilves' Background

1:03:52 Purpose of the Global GovTech Intelligence Hub

1:21:05 Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and UN Involvement

1:24:16 DPI Connections: Climate Goals, Digital Identity, Payment Systems

1:31:32 Influence of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Bilderberg Group, Peter Thiel

1:34:01 Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Carnegie Networks

RESOURCES

Welcome to Your Nightmare: The Externalization of the Agentic State

The Pharos Chronicles – Jacob Nordangård, PhD Welcome to Your Nightmare: The Externalization of the Agentic State In October last year World Economic Forum opened the Global Government Technology Centre (GGTC) at GovTech Campus Deutschland in Berlin with the mission to "accelerate the digital transformation of government" together with "founding partner", French IT-consultant… Read more 5 months ago · 208 likes · 35 comments · Jacob Nordangård

Download 'The Agentic State' white paper from here

A Primer on the Evolution and Impact of AI Agents | World Economic Forum

Global GovTech Board debuts at WEF 2025, driving the future of digital governance ⋆ IT Logs

GovTech Intelligence Hub - GovTech Briefing: The Agentic State

Berlin Global GovTech Centre

Executive Summary - Berlin Global GovTech Centre

Digital public infrastructure | United Nations Development Program