Flashlights

Subscribe now

Share

An Omnibus is a bus for everyone. You choose if you ride in it or not.

An Omniwar is a war against everyone. You have no choice whether to be part of it or not.

Omniwar's goal is to plug humanity into a technocratic system of control. In which ordinary humans have no say.

It's a vertical war: Not between nations but between an uber-wealthy tech-elite and the rest of us.

In my interview with renowned Swedish writer and researcher Jacob Nordangård we discuss the many facets of this dystopian type of creeping war we're finding ourselves in.

Nordangård is the author of several books, among them 'Rockefeller: Controlling the Game' and 'The Global Coup d'Ètat: The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Great Reset.'

His newest book 'The Digital World Brain' will be published in early 2026.

Omniwar, he says, manifests across many domains: Financial control, biosecurity, Agentic AI, cognitive warfare, digital surveillance, environmental control, food systems and reproduction control.

Nordangård outlines the historical development that led to Omniwar: "It goes back to the 1930s and the technocratic movement. I think it could be even older than that. It's a society run by scientists and engineers. No politicians, no vote. It's a perfect system for control over people. People will just be cells in a kind of an organism with information about every man and woman to be retrieved immediately."

We discuss the tech elites and their companies that are driving Omniwar. Why are so many of them now ensconced in the Trump administration? Why are they and President Trump gung-ho on building thousands of gigantic AI data centers that nobody wants except a minuscule elite?

What is the real purpose of the massive half a trillion AI infrastructure project called Stargate?

We talk about the neo-reactionary philosopher Nick Land and political theorist Curtis Yarvin whom tech moguls like Peter Thiel and others have embraced as their house philosophers.

Land and Yarvin provide the philosophical underpinning and justification for Omniwar.

Nick Land coined the expression 'Dark Enlightenment.' What is that? And what is 'Dark MAGA'?

Understanding Omniwar is the first step to resistance.

PS: There's a surprise visitor joining the interview at the very end. Don't miss it.

CHAPTERS

0:01:35 Democracy and Technocratic Influence

0:05:31 The Omniwar Symposium

0:10:10 Technocracy and Transhumanism

0:13:22 Surveillance, and Social Control

0:18:07 Financial Surveillance and Social Credit Systems

0:22:28 Biosecurity, Health Surveillance, and Pandemic Infrastructure

0:23:43 AI, Algorithms, Government, and Pre-Crime

0:27:01 Data Centers and the Role of Elites

0:31:46 Cognitive Warfare, Information Management and Censorship

0:36:46 Digital Surveillance, IDs, and Smart City Infrastructure

0:41:40 Societal Destabilization: Immigration, Violence, and Social Response

0:49:11 Environmental Control, Carbon Management, and Resource Rationing

0:54:08 Food System Control and Dietary Mandates

0:57:31 Reproduction, Population Engineering, and Transhumanism

1:00:39 Weapons of Control: Bio, Social, and Technological

1:02:09 The Ultimate Goal – Scientific Dictatorship and Global Order

1:02:39 Resistance Strategies and Awakening Public Awareness

1:10:29 Dark Enlightenment: Philosophical Underpinnings

1:17:47 Technocrat Billionaires, Governance, and Global Influence

1:22:14 Spiritual Agenda, Esoteric Influences, and Lucis Trust

1:28:39 Ascended Masters, Secret Societies, and Hidden Agendas

1:41:40 Final Reflections, Upcoming Works, and Closing Remarks

1:44:00 Surprise Visitor

RESOURCES

Jacob Nordangård's substack

Subscribe now

Share

Recently, I did a series of interviews with renowned biologist Hervé Seligmann who has conducted complex statistical analyses on how the mRNA Covid injections affect all-cause mortality.

The interviews with Hervé are exceptionally rich in content and cover many different and complex aspects of his research findings regarding the impact of the mRNA Covid injections.

Seligmann also discusses new insights that he hasn't publicly addressed before.

He is a biologist whose work centers on evolutionary and theoretical biology. Major themes of his research are genetic code evolution, mitochondrial genomes, tRNA function, overlapping genes, and origin of life research.

Over the last years, he has extensively researched and written about Covid related topics. In particular, he has conducted complex and original statistical analyses showing that Covid vaccination as well as shedding from the Covid injections are associated with increased all‑cause mortality.

To do his crucial insights justice and to not overwhelm listeners, I decided to divide the interviews into multiple parts.

In this first part, Seligmann discusses the chronology of Covid-19 mRNA injection devastation that should have ended the shots in early 2021:

"The chronology shows that the injections should have been immediately stopped because there was data, public data that I found already in January and February 2021 that clearly showed that people were dying from the vaccines and especially those people who had [had] COVID."

In addition, he provides a high-level overview of his extraordinary findings that he will discuss in depth in subsequent parts of his interviews with me. Here are some of them:

• Health insurance data from New Zealand leaked by Barry Young in December of 2023 confirm increased mortalities for the injected at least up to two years post-injection.

• Female fertility decreases proportionally to female injection rates.

• The less time passed between the first injection and the second injection, the more likely people were to die.

• The injections cause accelerated aging where the rate of aging as a function of age is exponential. Which means that, for a person 50 or 60 years old, one year ages the person two or three times as much as a non-vaccinated person of the same age.

• Unvaccinated Children mortality is proportional to adult injection rates.

Herve told me that the finding about child mortality in particular devastated him: "So this was very hard for me to believe and it took me about two months until I published it because for psychological reasons I couldn't believe the result, despite it being very clear. So I checked a lot, I waited to get two more months of data and so on, but I had seen it already in April [2021]. And the result is yes, the children who were basically uninjected at the time were dying proportionally to adult injections."

CHAPTERS

0:01:23 Early Pandemic Observations

0:07:24 Start of Vaccine Safety Research

0:07:37 Early Concerns About mRNA Vaccines

0:10:50 Vaccine Effectiveness and Antibody Types

0:11:48 Flu Vaccine, Nasal Spray, and Misinformation

0:15:40 Analysis of Israeli Data

0:19:46 Adult and Child Mortality, Fertility Impact

0:24:05 Barry Young's Leader New Zealand Data

0:28:19 Accelerated Aging

RESOURCES:

• Google Scholar - Herve Seligman

• COVID Vaccination and Age-Stratified All-Cause Mortality Risk, 2025-09-17

• ScholarGPS

Subscribe now

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) for Palestinian refugees publicly claims to adhere to UN values of human rights and tolerance.

In my interview with Karys Rhea, we take a look at UNRWA written textbooks, classroom exercises and school materials.

According to UNRWA itself, the agency "reviews all textbooks used in its schools to identify sections that may not be in line with UN values and UNESCO standards for teaching." http://www.unrwa.org/unrwa-claims-versus-facts-2025

In Gaza, UNRWA has taken on traditional government functions by not only providing education but healthcare, social services, microfinance, and infrastructure to the ~2 million population. UNRWA is one of Gaza's largest employers with ~13,000 employees.

This arrangement has freed Gaza's de facto government, Hamas, from governing responsibilities and has made it possible for Hamas to focus on the maintenance and expansion of its military/terror capabilities and operations.

Since almost all UNRWA employees in Gaza are Palestinian refugees themselves, they are unlikely to be neutral observers of the conflict between Israel and Palestinians.

Therefore, it is not surprising to find much evidence that UNRWA and Hamas are deeply intertwined with significant numbers of UNRWA employees or their immediate family members acting as Hamas operatives.

For example, Hamas uses UNRWA facilities (schools, clinics, compounds) for weapons storage, tunnel access, and military activity. Some UNRWA staff celebrate attacks on Israelis on social media. At least 12 of its employees participated in the October 7 massacres, with some of the hostages being held in UNRWA buildings and guarded by its employees.

Approximately one billion dollars, about 40% of UNRWA's total annual budget of ~$2.5 billion, is spent in Gaza.​ Since more than half of the budget, around 55-60%, is spent on education, about $600 million goes to schools and education services.

What do Palestinian children learn in UNRWA run schools?

What we find in UNRWA's reading and comprehension exercises and textbooks directly contradicts UNRWA's claims of being aligned with humans rights and tolerance:

Children are taught to "nourish the homeland with blood," and are urged to follow in the footsteps of famous male, and also female, terrorists - like, for example, Dalal Mughrabi.

Martyrdom is glorified; attacks on Israeli civilians are celebrated; jihad is promoted as life's highest meaning and a 'divine right.' Jews are depicted in dehumanized ways.

Children from elementary grades onward are taught that armed resistance ought to be the root of their identity and that jihad gives their lives meaning.

For example, a 9th grade UNRWA-created exercise tells students that if they neglect jihad, they will be cursed by God. Students are asked to complete a sentence regarding the consequences of not caring about jihad.

The correctly completed sentence reads: "The punishment of he who neglects jihad is that God curses him, blinds his eyesight, and deafens his hearing." https://www.impact-se.org/wp-content/uploads/UNRWA_Report_2023_IMPACT-se_And_UN-Watch.pdf

CHAPTERS

0:03:15 Radicalization and Education in Palestinian Society

0:09:23 Hamas' Control and the Aftermath of the 2006 Elections

0:13:08 Factions and Clans in Gaza; Reformist Efforts

0:14:52 UNRWA as De Facto Government; Overview of Services

0:23:25 Education Under UNRWA: Schools, Curriculum, and Indoctrination

0:28:20 Textbook Examples: Glorification of Terrorism and Martyrdom

0:51:15 War in Gaza: Effects on Schools and Humanitarian Aid

0:56:18 UNRWA's Official Perspective on Its Curriculum

1:01:11 Ties Between UNRWA, Hamas, and the October 7 Attacks

1:07:37 Humanitarian Aid in Post-UNRWA Gaza

1:09:17 Scope of Palestinian Radicalization

1:10:18 Solutions, De-radicalization, International Proposals

1:12:21 Assessing UNRWA's Operational Complicity in the Conflict

1:17:05 Closing Reflections on Complexity and Suffering in Gaza

RESOURCES

• United Nations Relief and Works Agency

• UN Watch

• UNRWA Education: Reform or Regression?

• demystifying the unrwa approach to curriculum jan 2020

• UNRWA: Facts Versus Claims

• UNRWA Terror Ties Extend to Highest Levels of Hamas

• UPDATED: Evidence Of UNRWA Aid To Hamas On And After October 7th - UN Watch

• Gaza's Clan Architecture: The Only Alternative to Hamas's Resurgence

Please note: This is the English Voiceover version of my interview with Pierre Obertin. You can find the original version here.

***

In 2020 and 2021, many people, if not most, did not realize that what was happening around the entire world was an utterly cynical powergame veiled as 'Health Security' with the goal of disempowering, surveilling and controlling citizens.

'Stay safe!'

This was neither the first nor the last powergame of our ever richer, reckless, vain and imperious rulers. But so far it was the most drastic and brutal one.

The necessary regulatory and legal frameworks for a sequel remain in place unchanged. In the US as well as in Europe.

What HAS changed is people's realization that they were betrayed, lied to, experimented on, physically harmed and killed in a breathtakingly contemptuous and cruel way.

Their next episode of powergames won't go as smoothly.

I asked Pierre Obertin, who lives in Luxembourg and has been writing about the Covid pandemic since 2021, how he assesses the current situation in Europe and how many people understand what really happened.

He told me: "I think that pretty much everyone is either personally affected or knows someone in their circle of friends or family who has had a serious side effect or has even passed away. I think that by now, a lot of people have become aware of this. But they're not walking around with a sign saying: 'Now I understand.' It happens inside them, it's not visible."

"And I think," he said, that "the crucial test will come next time. When things start again and the screws are tightened."

CHAPTERS

[01:56] Why were the EU crisis responses so uniform?

[04:04] Historical development of the EU health framework since the 1990s

[06:50] Swine flu as a precursor and EU crisis documents

[13:13] Military and security services: State of emergency and EU coordination

[15:09] Pandemic plans, the influence of Imperial College London

[22:37] Lockdown until vaccine: Role of vaccine development

[25:51] Medical care, Remdesivir, and control politics

[32:26] Joint vaccine procurement and parliamentary powerlessness

[37:12] Stella Kyriakides: Responsibility for Health and Food Safety

[38:31] EMA, approval pressure, and scandal documents

[45:58] EU Advisory Panel: Composition and Influence

[01:00:02] Panel Meetings from March 2020 and School Closures

[01:04:47] Role of the ECDC and Implementation of Political Decisions as 'Science'

[01:11:32] Italy as a Lockdown Test Case

[01:12:46] Controlling the Narrative, Fear of Public Resistance

[01:15:23] Lockdown Decisions, Exit Strategies, and 'Lines to Take' Documents

[01:16:25] EU Framework for Lockdowns and Influence on Individual States

[01:33:48] Authoritarian Communication Mechanisms, 'Lines to Take'

[01:39:52] mRNA Vaccinations: Excess Mortality and Societal Consequences

[01:41:18] Public Sentiment and Vaccine Criticism in Europe

[01:43:06] Outlook: Digital ID, Global Public-Private Partnerships

RESOURCES:

• Pierre Obertin "Geliefert wie bestellt: Lockdown & Co."

• Pierre Obertin: Geheime E-Mails aus Stockholm

• Cees van den Bos: Corona-Politik von der Europäischen Kommission festgelegt

• "Profiteure der Angst" ARTE/NDR Dokumentation 2009

• Anfrage AsktheEU.org von Sergio Pérez Sangiao

• List of authorities represented in the Health Security Committee. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. European Commission.

Subscribe now

Did you know that the only safe medical data is data that is stored inside your own body?

I didn't know that either until Nic Hulscher recently discovered some very interesting research papers about 'On Patient Medical Recordkeeping' technology.

The quote below is from an article that was published in PubMed six years ago, in December 2019: "Accurate medical recordkeeping is a major challenge in many low-resource settings where well-maintained centralized databases do not exist, contributing to 1.5 million vaccine-preventable deaths annually."

It took humans several hundred years to figure out that we are not able to maintain accurate medical records, but now we finally know.

And it's a lucky thing that we only figured this out now, because we are finally reaching the stage where we are able to reliably record medical data: by encoding them into every living human body - in particular data about received vaccines.

There's even a cute - no, more than cute: a heart warming acronym for this brilliant new record keeping method: OPMR.

The following quote is from an article in 'Nature Materials' from February 2025:

"We developed a robust on-patient medical record-keeping (OPMR) technology using a dissolvable microneedle patch (MNP) that delivers a quantum dot (QD)-based near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent dye encapsulated in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) microparticles into the skin to encode medical information. This dye, once deposited into the dermis, is invisible to the naked eye, offering patient data privacy and anonymity, but provides discrete NIR signals that can be detected using a NIR imaging system."

Isn't it wonderful that we have found a way to not only make it impossible to lose medical records but to keep our medical records truly private and anonymous - and especially the number of vaccine microneedle patches we got administered? Nobody will ever know - except all the folks who detect the oh so discrete Near Infrared signals with the help of the NIR imaging system. And maybe it won't be folks much longer who detect them but some friendly AI agent. Which makes it even more sublime.

We can also stop stressing about our medical records being unavailable when China or some other country cuts the subsea cables to crash the internet:

"By depositing the dye in a predefined pattern that correlates to a specific set of information, the technology can be imaged by healthcare workers to support next-dose decisions without requiring internet connectivity or the use of centralized databases."

See? Internet connectivity is not required. Marvelous. Life-saving 'next-dose decisions' won't be blocked ever - internet or not.

And in case you were wondering whether our scientists remembered to cover the social justice angle, do not fear: "This technology could help healthcare workers make informed decisions in circumstances where reliable record-keeping is unavailable, thus contributing to global healthcare equity."

A big thank you to the wonderful people at HHS, NIH, the Koch institute and of course the Gates Foundation whose grant monies made it possible for brave scientists to develop this magnificent new record keeping method. Honestly, where would we be without our dear federal health agencies and the fabulous Gates Foundation?

And they understand that only the best is good enough for us:

"To enable the OPMR [On Patient Medical Record] with excellent information capacity, security and reliability, we designed the MNP [Micro Needle Patch] architecture and administration for consistent and optimal data transfer and longevity; achieved an information capacity of billions of encoded patterns using an error correcting code; and developed a temporally and spatially reliable information retrieval system using machine learning."

An information capacity of billions of encoded patterns - and with an error correcting code! The scientists deserve not just one, but at least two Freedom Medals, maybe more. And the LLMs can finally gorge themselves on data again, just when we thought we were running out.

But, wait, it gets more sumptuous: these superb microneedles are not only carrying the dye for imprinting a digital code into the body but they carry a second payload. Maybe you can guess what that payload might be?

EXACTLY! It's an mRNA vaccine. Now that's a dream come true. No more painful vaccine injections, the long needles replaced with eensy weensy ones. Infants and toddlers won't even know they're being vaccinated.

This is what the February 2025 article says:

"We optimize the microneedle design for both a reliable delivery of messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics and the near-infrared fluorescent microparticles that encode the on-patient medical record-keeping… Long-term studies in a swine model demonstrate the safety, efficacy and reliability of this approach for the co-delivery of on-patient medical record-keeping and the mRNA vaccine encoding severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)."

Superb. We all know about the safety and efficacy of the amazing mRNA vaccines and to have them co-delivered straight into our bodies in tandem with our precious medical data is a stroke of genius.

This elegant new technology will not only turn us into walking bio-digital vaccine passports that will be biosensed by deep learning-based image processing agents, but - even more delicious - we will be loaded with the newest and best mRNA vaccines the science has to offer.

How exactly does this biosensing work you want to know? It's simple and can be done from a smartphone:

"An Android smartphone application 'IR Record' was custom developed to capture the OPMR NIR dye signal and can save images. The software is designed to take 30 consecutive images with six different exposure settings and five different gain settings. This bracket scanning method allows the capture of NIR signals with varying intensities over time. Among the 30 images, one image with the best reading results gets automatically chosen and processed."

Five different gain settings and six (!) different exposure settings! Now you can start scanning yourself first thing in the morning to get your day off to a good start. That's what I call resilience.

The researchers also note: "In cases of emergency like in a pandemic or natural disaster, or at refugee or military camps, OPMR patches can be administered on-demand." And not only administered, but possibly self-administered.

Since we know that the recent pandemic was just a rehearsal, it is most reassuring to know that we will not have to stand in line during the next pandemic. The dissolvable microneedle patch might come to you by old-fashioned snail mail so that you can administer it in the privacy of your own home. What's more to be wished for?

Well, thinking about it, there are more dreams to come true. A bio-digital vaccine passport is a solid start for sure, but we should not let ourselves be limited to the vaccine aspect.

A bio-digital passport could be good for all sorts of things that society has to offer. It would make a tremendous 'Open sesame!' for daily life, from the doors to the supermarket to the doors of the restaurant, movie theatre, train and bus. Not to forget the door of one's own apartment.

Maybe the relevant authorities need reminding that our own doors require scanning not just from outside to inside but also from inside to outside. To keep us all safe.

Because what if you forgot to administer the patch sent to you in the mail? No big deal: you'll be reminded as soon as you try to get out of the door. Voilà!

Oh, the awesomeness.

CHAPTERS

0:00:08 Introduction to Micro Needle Patch and Quantum Dots

1:01:44 Vaccine Tracking, Societal Control, and Concerns Raised

0:03:50 Technical Foundations: Quantum Dots Longevity and Detection

0:04:10 Smartphone Scanning and Machine Learning Usage

0:08:09 Historical Context: AI, Data Centers, and Early Research

0:09:47 Vaccine Delivery, Co-delivery Methods, and Antibody Response

0:11:14 Envisioning Dystopian Control and Compliance

0:15:38 Decentralized Data Storage and Bio Sensing Discussion

0:16:59 Wearables, Biosensing, and Public Endorsements

0:19:06 Technical, Material, and Health Concerns

0:20:41 How the Patch Works: Schematics and Challenges

0:24:40 Societal Control: AI, Compliance, and Bypass Loopholes

0:28:51 Next-Generation Patch: mRNA, Self-Administration, and Trust Issues

0:35:00 Privacy, Data Storage in the Body, and Centralization

0:41:21 Expansion to mRNA Applications and Potential Harm

0:44:03 Digital Identities and Multipurpose Use Cases

1:01:45 Resistance, Public Compliance, and Civil Rights

1:12:32 Public Awareness, Accountability, and Call to Action

RESOURCES:

• nature materials: 'On-patient medical record and mRNA therapeutics using intradermal microneedles', February 2025

• PubMed: 'Biocompatible near-infrared quantum dots delivered to the skin by microneedle patches record vaccination', December 2019

  FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse) Microneedle Patch 'Vaccines' By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH… Read more a year ago · 168 likes · 20 comments · Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse) New Gates-Funded Microneedle Patch Implant Installs Both mRNA and Quantum Dot Markings Into the Body by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH… Listen now 2 months ago · 315 likes · 122 comments · Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Subscribe now

Share

In 2020, the year society was locked down and basic constitutional rights of the entire US population were discarded, civil cases increased by more than 60%. In that year alone, there was an excess of lawsuits compared to prior years of over 180,000 cases:

John Beaudoin told me: "Did they hire 62% more people to handle those cases? No. Did everybody in the court system, all the judges and all the clerks, work 62 % more hours? Like 14 hours a day, every day for a year? No. There's only one way to do this: Dismiss, dismiss, dismiss."

And that is what happened: mass dismissals of civil lawsuits based on the standing doctrine. To have standing, the plaintiffs must prove harm from the action or conduct they're challenging. And one would think that this should be easy. It is anything but.

Beaudoin points to two rather recent landmark Supreme Court Cases that drastically raised the bar for plaintiffs to have sufficient standing so that their case would survive a motion to dismiss: Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal (2009).

According to Beaudoin, "Legal doctrines like Twombly and Iqbal let judges dismiss nearly any case if it's deemed implausible or lacking facts, no matter the injustice."

To get an idea how often SCOTUS referred to Twombly and Iqbal to dismiss cases, he gathered the numbers of case citations for all cases decided by the Supreme Court: "I gleaned these from Google Scholar. I've since checked it out at Westlaw. And although the numbers are different, they're proportional. So the graph would look exactly the same, but the bottom numbers would be like 380,000 instead of 300,000. But the others would go up, too, proportionally. So Westlaw is counting differently than Google Scholar."

Astonishingly, Twombly and Iqbal are the most quoted cases with almost 300,000 citations each. Despite the fact that these cases have only been around for about 16 years:

According to Beaudoin, both Twombly and iqbal "were used before COVID, but since COVID came, the courts use these two cases to blow everything out of the water."

And he continued: "I can prove that many of these cases were unrighteously dismissed, or I can prove that they used dismissal doctrines in the court and civil procedure to never hear the substance of these cases."

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution lists the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. That right, says Beaudoin, is the most foundational right for citizens to uphold and protect their other core rights like freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

But what's the value of a theoretical right to petition for a redress of grievances, if it's near to impossible to get standing, i.e. to have the court acknowledge that grievances did in fact happen to the plaintiff?

"If we can't get resolution in the courts, there's nowhere else to go. And the courts refuse to do their jobs," he says.

The question then is what happens to a society where the courts are not doing their job of dispute resolution. Where courts dismiss citizens' cases for even the most serious breaches of fundamental constitutional rights.

Beaudoin is convinced that as a consequence civil society starts breaking down: "You have people dividing into camps because the issues are not being settled or adjudicated. And so you leave it to society to fight amongst each other, fight on social media, fight in the streets. We're devolving as a civil society based on what's happened with these two cases and the way the courts are operating, extremely inefficiently dismissing righteous cases that should be heard."

But societal breakdown is not inevitable, he emphasizes, because the underlying cause is fixable: "What is the root cause where, if you change something, you can fix the whole system? One of the things that you can fix is standing doctrine and that would fix a lot in the United States."

And who should fix it? "John Roberts came in in 2005 as Chief Justice. Those cases I just showed you were two years after he got there and four years after he got there. He broke it. His court broke the system, so he's got to fix it. Or the United States will devolve into civil war."

CHAPTERS

0:00:00 Introduction and Overview of Graph Data

0:00:50 Explanation of Yearly Data Variation

0:01:09 Highlighting Significant Data Points

0:13:09 Standing Doctrine

0:13:32 Further Analysis of Legal Standing and Case Dismissals

0:14:29 Critique of Judicial System and Focus on Courts

0:18:40 Why The PREP Act Is Unconstitutional

0:20:00 Beaudoin's Petition to the Supreme Court

0:22:19 Root Cause Analysis and Call for Judicial Reform

RESOURCES

Beaudoin's Substack: The Real CdC's Newsletter

Subscribe now

Share

"Massachusetts has been committing fraud as a matter of custom and practice every single day when they write COVID on death records when it's not COVID and omit the vaccine as a cause of death, when they know it's the vaccine," John Beaudoin told me.

It's not just Massachusetts or other U.S. states that are manipulating death certificate data. According to Beaudoin, the CDC stopped using the proper ICD (Internal Classification of Diseases) code to classify deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccinations.

Systems engineer John Beaudoin succeeded in obtaining all official Massachusetts death records from 2015 through 2024: "I was going to the gym one morning and I heard that a seven year old girl, Cassidy Baracka, died from COVID in January of 2022. I thought to myself that there's no way a healthy seven year old girl dies from COVID. Doesn't happen. It hasn't happened. Not a single time. And so I asked for her death record."

Massachusetts, where Beaudoin lives, is one of the very few states in America that allows unrestricted public access to death certificates. Nonetheless, his request was denied: "They wouldn't give Cassidy's death certificate to me. I did eight different public records requests for all kinds of stuff. I ran them through other people, so that my name wouldn't be on all of them."

Massachusetts refused all his public record requests except the one where he asked for ALL of the state's death records from 2015: "Only one of my eight requests came through. And it was the one that asked for all the death records from 2015 … I was kind of scared. Did they give these to me by accident? Are they going to take them away?"

Beaudoin then cross-referenced the Massachusetts death records with VAERS data and uncovered widespread data fraud. According to his findings, the CDC stopped coding deaths related to Covid-19 vaccinations with the appropriate ICD codes. In addition, he uncovered plenty of evidence that doctors and medical examiners in Massachusetts issued fraudulent death certificates, labelling Covid shot deaths and other non-Covid deaths as Covid deaths.

Although physicians and medical examiners fill out death certificates, they are not authorized to add the ICD code that corresponds to the cause of death. This is the job of a central federal agency, the CDC.

Therefore, all states must send all their death certificates to a central parsing system run by the CDC: "They have two software programs called Transax and ACME. And those two programs read the words, they parse the words, and they spit out codes."

There is an ICD code for Covid shot deaths: U12.9. However, this code is apparently hardly ever used by the CDC. Instead, the CDC codes Covid shots as Y59.0, a code that encompasses all 'viral vaccines.'

Beaudoin told me: "U12.9 means Covid-19 vaccine specifically. It's not used on death records. There are notations in the literature of England and Germany where there's an asterisk under U12.9 and it says that it's not really used much and it's a subcategory of Y59.0."

After the CDC codes the death certificates, they are sent back to the states. And that's how Beaudoin was able to check whether the ICD codes corresponded to the cause of death written on the death certificates by physicians and medical examiners. He said: "I'm betting that the software actually spit out the Y59.0. And on some it went through, but on others they deleted it and they sent it back to the States without the Y59.0. Somebody I believe at the CDC has been deleting Y59.0."

Later, when he also got access to death certificates in Connecticut and Minnesota, states where death records are also public, he discovered the same phenomenon: "The first one in Connecticut is coded. The next three in Connecticut, not coded … So you have three states [Massachusetts, Connecticut, Minnesota] in which the first one's coded, the rest aren't. They stopped coding them. Why? They're hiding the vaccine deaths from the American people."

When Beaudoin examined the ICD-coded death data for the entire United States using the CDC's WONDER Multiple Cause of Death database, he found fewer than 300 deaths coded under Y59.0 for all the years following the onset of COVID-19:

CHAPTERS

0:00:00 John's Childhood Hearing Loss & the 1968 Hong Kong Flu

0:04:33 Early Life Memories and Academic Background

0:05:12 Analyzing CDC Data and Losing Trust

0:09:56 Lawsuit Over Mask Mandate and Experiences with Exemptions

0:12:26 Facing Public Pushback Over Mask Exemption

0:16:21 Strategy Against Mask Policies and Exception Details

0:21:15 Entering Data Analysis and Legal Battles Post-Law School

0:24:54 Obtaining Massachusetts Death Records and First Discoveries

0:29:37 Vaccine Reactions and The Cassidy Case

0:35:40 Death Certificate Certifiers and Patterns in Data

0:40:07 Financial Incentives Driving Hospital COVID Diagnoses

0:47:39 How Evidence-Based Medicine and Coding Changed Healthcare

0:52:17 Doctor-Patient Relationship in the Age of Electronic Records

0:57:13 Investigating Young Vaccine-Related Deaths

1:01:02 Media Suppression and the Cascade of Preventable Tragedies

1:07:44 ICD Codes, Centralization, and CDC Manipulation

1:18:12 Decentralized Coding Practices and Data Errors

1:23:08 Government Censorship and Social Media Control

1:29:14 Professional Threats to Doctors and Board Certifications

RESOURCES

Beaudoin's Substack: The Real CdC's Newsletter

Subscribe now

Share

Dr. Joseph Sansone: "People need to really get what I'm saying: Most people that you know will die from these injections."

The debate must shift from arguing about mRNA Covid shot mandates and "recommendations" to arguing that these shots are biological weapons of mass destruction, Sansone says: "You can't win by arguing mandates. So you have to take a stake and go right into the vampire's heart. These are weapons of mass destruction."

Sansone argues that mRNA injections are already illegal according to existing bioweapon laws and existing weapons of mass destruction laws because it is widely known that the shots are causing carnage among the population: "You're shortening lifespans, you're reducing birth rates … These injections cause neurological problems, heart problems, cancers, and so on. They're associated with increased infant mortality and fertility problems … If you're a 35 year old man or woman and you got this injection and you only live to be 63 instead of 80, they just stole 17 years of your life."

Knowing about the harmfulness of the shots, he says, meets the knowingness standard of intent and this creates a criminal and civil liability for anyone having anything to do with the shots.

Sansone not only talks the walk but walks the walk: "The court system needs to get flooded with cases. Go think back into the 50s and 60s with all the civil rights cases. They filed case after case after case after case." And that's exactly what he has been doing since early 2023 when he introduced his first 'Ban the Jab' resolution in Lee County, Florida.

The resolution declared COVID‑19 and mRNA injections "biological and technological weapons of mass destruction" and called on Governor Ron DeSantis and the Attorney General to ban the Covid shots in Florida. The late Dr. Francis Boyle, main author of the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti‑Terrorism Act, endorsed his resolution.

In 2024, Sansone filed a lawsuit, a so-called writ of mandamus, against Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody in the Florida Supreme Court. His goal is to force the Governor to prohibit the Covid-19 mRNA shots in Florida.

Subsequently, he drafted the "Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act" which criminalizes the manufacturing, distribution, and possession of any products that make use of mRNA technology. In April this year, several Republican representatives in the Minnesota legislature were the first ones nationwide to introduce his bill.

Sansone is asking Americans to get his mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act introduced in many more states: "You go find someone who might have the courage to do it and get it introduced because one, it's going to make a splash, even with all the censorship, it's going to get out there and people's heads will spin. This gets introduced in places like New Jersey, New York or California, their heads are going to spin. They're not going to know how to handle that … Let's say we can get this introduced in like a dozen or 15 states. A lot of states don't come back in a session until January. But let's say we can get this introduced in a bunch of states. The writing is going to be on the wall … Eventually the mRNA shots are going to get prohibited in the whole country or we're going to have a revolution."

Why has it taken more than 2 years from his first 'Ban the Jab' resolution to having the mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act introduced in the first state?

He says: "The reason we're not where we should be is because when I did that first 'Ban the Jab'resolution, I got as much pushback from 'our' side as I did from the other side and most of the people in the alternative media are still censoring what I and other people like me have been doing because they don't want to admit these are weapons because they're either afraid of losing access or being canceled."

Those who could stop the shots - the President, the head of the FDA, state governors, district attorneys, prosecutors,sheriffs - are not doing it: "These people are either complicit or looking the other way which makes them complicit in biological warfare against the American people … They could literally change the course of human history, but that would require a little courage. These people are afraid."

We also talk about the Dutch law case brought by several Dutch citizens harmed by the mRNA shots and the unexplained arrest of Arno van Kessel, one of the lawyers that are representing them. The plaintiffs are suing, among others, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, the former Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte as well as the entire Dutch government.

CHAPTERS

0:00:17 Clinical Hypnosis Background and Susceptibility

0:01:41 Intelligence, Authority, and Brainwashing

0:04:46 COVID-19 Injections as Bioweapons: Early Awareness and Legal Context

0:09:01 Legal Challenges: Mandamus Case and Procedural Issues

0:16:02 Health Impacts, Shedding, and Filing Appeals

0:22:48 Role of Public Health Officials and Political Responses

0:36:30 Drafting and Promoting Bio-Weapons Prohibition Legislation

0:41:38 Provisions and Implications of the Proposed Law

0:46:27 Overcoming Legal Barriers and Grassroots Advocacy

0:54:54 Scientific Support, Public Perception, and Broader Vaccine Debates

1:02:14 Francis Boyle's Expertise, Affidavit, and His Passing

1:08:16 The Dutch Lawsuit Against Bill Gates

1:12:45 Legal Risks, Arrest of Lawyer Arno van Kessel

1:18:14 Trump, Pfizer Deal, and Political Disappointment

RESOURCES

Mind Matters and Everything Else with Dr. Joseph Sansone I Am Going To War! Will You Join Me? 50 Different State Versions of the 'Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act'. Mind Matters and Everything Else with Dr. Joseph Sansone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber… Read more 8 months ago · 264 likes · 98 comments · Dr. Joseph Sansone

Subscribe now

Share

To my English speaking viewers: I will release the interview with English voiceover in a little while. Or you can watch it on YouTube with English subtitles turned on:

***

Wieso lief die Inszenierung der Covid-19 Pandemie so reibungslos ab in der EU - ganz so wie in den USA, Kanada, Australien und anderen Ländern? Es war, als wäre das alles schon vorher geprobt und einstudiert worden.

Pierre Obertin, Autor des Substacks "Expressis Verbis", sagte mir während unseres Interviews: "Die Sache war schon irgendwie am Laufen. Da ging es eigentlich nur noch darum, das irgendwie zu koordinieren. Und da gab es dann halt auch, wie wir jetzt erfahren haben, Kommunikationswege: da war schon geplant, wie das ablaufen sollte."

Obertin schreibt seit 2021 über die Covid Pandemie und hinterfragt das der Weltbevölkerung vorgeschriebene offizielle Narrativ.

Er ist Luxemburger und lebt in Luxemburg. An der Technischen Universität in Kaiserslautern hat er seinen Masters Degree in angewandter Mathematik gemacht und momentan arbeitet er als Informatiklehrer.

Warum gab - und gibt es - ein weltweites Rahmenwerk, das wie ein gut geöltes Uhrwerk alle Räder, Federn und Regler bereits am richtigen Platz hatte, als im Januar 2020 der Anpfiff kam?

Ganz einfach: weil das Machtspiel bühnenreif war. Weil die entscheidungsbefugten Institutionen und deren Vertreter aus den "Fehlern" der anderen nicht ganz so glatt abgelaufenen Pandemien, wie der Schweinegrippe, gelernt hatten. Weil es zig mal geprobt worden war: in den USA (Dark Winter, Atlantic Storm, CLADE X, Event 201) wie in der EU. Generalprobe für die EU war "Blue Orchid" im Februar 2019.

In unserem Interview beschreibt Pierre die Strukturen innerhalb der EU, die über die letzten Jahrzehnte für die ganz großen geplanten Machtspiele aufgebaut und getestet wurden - wie eben die Pandemiekrise. Obertin: "Corona kam ja nicht von heute auf morgen. Das ging eigentlich schon los in den 90er Jahren. Nach dem Ende des Kalten Krieges musste irgendwie was Neues kommen. Und dann ging es ja auch los in den 90er Jahren mit dem Klima. Das Thema Klima kam und eben auch das andere Thema: ansteckende Krankheiten. Die sollten wieder kommen."

Bei der Schweinegrippe 2010, da klappte es noch nicht so ganz. Aber zehn Jahre später war es dann soweit: Vorhang auf für Corona. Und die Rolle der Bevölkerung? Zuschauen, Eintauchen in das Märchen, "dispense disbelief", Beifall klatschen und immer wieder den Arm hinhalten für regelmäßige "Schutzspritzen."

Dass es hier im Namen der "Gesundheitssicherheit" in Wirklichkeit um die Entmachtung der eigenen Bevölkerung ging, das war 2020 vielen nicht klar.

Beim zweitenmal wird es wohl nicht ganz so glatt über die Bühne gehen.

KAPITEL

[00:00] Einführung, Vorstellung von Pierre und Thema des Interviews

[00:44] Pierre über seine Artikel, beruflicher Hintergrund und Covid-Fokus

[01:56] Warum waren die EU-Krisenreaktionen so einheitlich?

[04:04] Historische Entwicklung des EU-Gesundheitsrahmens seit den 1990ern

[06:50] Schweinegrippe als Vorlauf und EU-Krisendokumente

[09:27] Wissenschaft und Krisenkommunikation: Wer entscheidet?

[13:13] Militär und Security Services: Ausnahmezustand und EU-Koordination

[15:09] Pandemiepläne, der Einfluss des Imperial College London

[19:36] Die Voraussagen und Publikationen zur Pandemie

[21:11] Epidemie-Definitionen und erste Covid-Entwicklungen in Europa

[22:37] Lockdown until vaccine: Rolle der Impfstoffentwicklung

[25:51] Medizinische Versorgung, Remdesivir und Kontrollpolitik

[28:56] Politische Struktur der EU: Von der Leyen und Kommissions-Mechanismen

[31:14] Ursula von der Leyen und Berateraffäre

[32:26] Gemeinsamer Impfstoffeinkauf und parlamentarische Machtlosigkeit

[34:46] Entscheidungsstrukturen und Einfluss einzelner Kommissare

[37:12] Stella Kyriakides: Verantwortung für Health and Food Safety

[38:31] EMA, Zulassungsdruck und Skandal-Dokumente

[42:55] DG Health, Unterbehörden, Kernfunktionen der Pandemiepolitik

[45:58] EU Advisory Panel: Zusammensetzung und Einfluss

[51:16] Interessen, Gain of Function und Vernetzungen im Panel

[57:03] Entscheidungsträger und Machtverhältnisse im Panel

[01:00:02] Panel-Meetings ab März 2020 und Schulschließungen

[01:04:47] Rolle des ECDC und Umsetzung politischer Entscheidungen als "Wissenschaft"

[01:11:32] Italien als Lockdown-Testfall

[01:12:46] Kontrolle des Narrativs, Angst vor Widerstand der Bevölkerung

[01:15:23] Lockdown-Beschlüsse, Exit-Strategien und "Lines to take"-Dokumente

[01:16:25] EU-Rahmen für Lockdowns und Einfluss auf Einzelstaaten

[01:33:48] Autoritäre Kommunikationsmechanismen, "Lines to Take"

[01:39:52] mRNA-Impfungen: Übersterblichkeit und gesellschaftliche Folgen

[01:41:18] Gesellschaftliche Stimmung und Impfkritik in Europa

[01:43:06] Ausblick: Digitale ID, Global Public Private Partnerships

[01:44:21] Fazit und Abschied

RESOURCEN:

• Pierre Obertin "Geliefert wie bestellt: Lockdown & Co."

• Pierre Obertin: Geheime E-Mails aus Stockholm

• Cees van den Bos: Corona-Politik von der Europäischen Kommission festgelegt

• "Profiteure der Angst" ARTE/NDR Dokumentation 2009

• Anfrage AsktheEU.org von Sergio Pérez Sangiao

• List of authorities represented in the Health Security Committee. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. European Commission.

• Crisis communication - HSC Communicators' network. Directorate-General Health and Consumer Protection (SANCO), 2010.

• ECDC lines-to-take: Novel coronavirus, China, 2019-nCoV. Last update: 21 January 2020, Ursprüngliche URL

• Global Health Security Initiative - 10 years of collaborative action. 2011.

Subscribe now

Share

Albert Benavides, the creator of VAERSAware.com, told me: "Of those 200 official dead kids that are officially in there [VAERS], there's actually 600 dead kids, but you don't see them because the age field is not populated."

Surprisingly, age is not a required field when submitting a report to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the database managed by the CDC and FDA to track vaccine-related injuries and deaths. In fact, hardly any fields on the VAERS form are mandatory.

Albert explains: "And yet, the age is properly documented in the summary narrative. More than 400 of these actual dead kids are sitting in a bucket of unknown ages."

Those 400 reports are still in the system, but without an age attached, they aren't counted in the official total for children's deaths. That's how VAERS ended up concealing the deaths of 400 children who died after the mRNA shots.

Albert uncovered this information through meticulous analysis of VAERS data, by reviewing individual reports, and extracting details from the summary narratives. Through this effort, he estimates that the actual number of child deaths linked to mRNA COVID-19 shots is closer to 600, rather than the officially reported 200.

However, even that figure may fall short of the true total. VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on voluntary reporting. As a result, the actual number of vaccine-related injuries and deaths is uncertain.

A 2011 Harvard report found that fewer than 1% of all adverse events are reported to VAERS. However, deaths occurring shortly after vaccination are likely to be reported at a higher rate, though the exact percentage remains unknown. For deaths that occur longer after vaccination, the likelihood of reporting is probably much lower, suggesting an even greater degree of underreporting.

Another disturbing 'feature' of VAERS is that a significant number of valid reports are never made publicly available through the CDC's WONDER system, and many reports are later removed. React19, a Covid-19 vaccine injury support group, discovered during a 2022 audit that 1 out of 3 adverse event reports submitted to VAERS by their members were never published.

As data analyst Albert Benavides puts it: "It almost makes everything else a moot point if we know that we're basically analyzing curated data and that VAERS basically does not publish all legitimate reports received."

The issue isn't simply system failure - it raises the concern that the system may deliberately be structured in a way to conceal the full scope of vaccine-related injuries and deaths.

HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy is well aware of the problem. During the interview, Albert recounts how Kennedy came to speak at Albert's church in San Jose, California:

"On June 19, 2021, Bobby came to our church. And he's only said it once. I've never heard him say it again. The week before he had met with a group of various CDC adjudicators who came to him as a group and collectively told him that 150,000 reports had disappeared from their queues. And these were all reports that they were working on to adjudicate, to finalize and publish. This is in line with what we're saying that React 19 has people that have published reports and that have never been published. And I have submitted reports that have never been published."

The VAERS/CDC adjudicators who came to Robert Kennedy in 2022 to alert him to the 150,000 disappeared reports: who are they? Who made the reports disappear from VAERS? Who gave the order to make them disappear?

We do not know.

CHAPTERS

0:00:00 Introduction, President's Vaccine Statement, and Letter Plans

0:02:27 Albert Joins and Overview of VAERS Data Analysis

0:05:31 Explanation of React19 and VAERS Report Issues

0:08:51 Deleted and Missing VAERS Reports: Causes and Concerns

0:12:46 Public Visibility and Permanent IDs in VAERS

0:17:34 Underreporting and Hidden Data in VAERS

0:19:46 VAERS adjudicators Tell RFK that 150,000 Reports Disappeared

0:23:13 Temporary vs. Final ID Numbers and Data Discrepancies

0:31:33 VAERSaware Dashboard: Data Overview and Demonstration

0:36:11 Age and State Data Issues in VAERS Reports

0:43:42 Dashboard Features: Gender, Lot Numbers, and Toxic Batches

0:48:50 Lot Sizes, Shipments, and Data Limitations

0:52:45 Data Lags and Delays in Report Publication

0:55:13 Missing Data and Adjudication Problems

1:02:53 What Should Happen to VAERS: Albert's Ideas

RESOURCES

• VAERSAware

• FDA Conducting 'Intense Investigation' of Child Deaths Following COVID Shot