
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


What do China’s new supply chain security and counter-extraterritoriality rules mean for European companies trying to conduct human rights and environmental due diligence?
In this episode of the Frankly Speaking podcast, Richard Howitt was joined by Katja Drinhausen, Head of Programme Politics and Society at the Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS).
Together they discuss China’s new regulations on supply chain security and countering the undue exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction, and what they could mean for European and other international companies carrying out human rights and environmental due diligence in the country.
You’ll also hear more about:
The growing tension between Chinese regulations and European and US requirements on forced labour and supply chain due diligence
How the new rules could make it harder for companies to gather information and conduct audits in Chinese supply chains
How China’s approach to ESG and social responsibility differs from European approaches, particularly when it comes to human rights, independent oversight and civil society participation
Whether Chinese due diligence and sustainability initiatives can provide alternatives to international tools and standards
Katja’s advice to companies on how they can continue conducting responsible due diligence in China while also protecting both workers and those carrying out investigations
Listen in and follow us on LinkedIn and Youtube!
The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) has moved from political negotiations to the next critical phase: implementation. But what does meaningful implementation actually look like?
In this episode of Frankly Speaking, Richard Howitt was joined by Julia Otten, Senior Policy Officer at Frank Bold, and Amandine Van Den Berghe, Senior Lawyer specialising in value chains, trade and investment at ClientEarth.
Together they discussed their new joint publication “Corporate Environmental Due Diligence and Reporting in the EU,” which aims to support Members States in transposing the CSDDD in the most effective manner. You’ll also hear about:
Listen in and follow us on LinkedIn and Youtube!
What is the social value of banks?
In this episode of Frankly Speaking, Richard Howitt was joined by Anna Koolstra, Advocacy Manager, Impact and Economics at Triodos Bank, which is a founding member of the Sustainable Banking Coalition.
Together they discussed the state of the EU’s financial system and how the digital euro may actually support Europe’s sustainability goals. You’ll also hear about:
Listen in and follow us on LinkedIn and Youtube!
What do the recurring heatwaves, floods and fires in Europe this summer tell us about the state of sustainability progressin the EU?
In this episode of Frankly Speaking, Richard Howitt was joined by Leena Ylä-Mononen, Executive Director of theEuropean Environment Agency, an EU body that works to inform decision-makers and the public about the state of Europe’s environment, climate change and wider sustainability issues.
Together they discussed the EEA’s recent reports on national climate risk assessments, as well as how well Europe is currently doing on climate adaptation. You’ll also hear about:
Listen in and follow us on LinkedIn and Youtube!
What does effective Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement (MSE) look like in the food and agriculture sector?
In this episode of Frankly Speaking, Richard Howitt was joined by Danny Miles, Head of Collective Action at the Ethical Trading Initiative, as well as Dr Wilson Odiyo, Corporate Affairs Director for Eastern Produce Regional Services (EPRS), a consultancy based in Kenya with expertise in agro-economics, providing technical support, marketing and logistics to agricultural producers in eastern and southern Africa, and one of ETI’s company members.
Together they discussed ETI’s recently developed guidance on MSE for the food and agriculture industry alongside an alliance of organisations (Amfori, FLA, Oxfam Sweden amongst others), as well as EPRS’s experience in implementing it.
You’ll also hear about:
Listen in and follow us on LinkedIn and Youtube!
Can businesses really tackle the pervasive issue of modern slavery?
In this episode of Frankly Speaking, Richard Howitt was joined by an expert in the field, Johannes Dumay, Professor in accounting at Macquarie University, Sydney, and multi-award-winning researcher on modern slavery as well as sustainability accounting and reporting.
Together they discussed how corporate attitudes towards modern slavery have (and haven't!) evolved over the past decade, as well as what the increasing number of court cases on the issue mean for the future of companies’ responsibility and duty of care in their supply chains. You’ll also hear about:
John's verdict on whether legal requirements on companies in relation to modern slavery, from the UK to Australia, have actually been effective
Why companies having more of a risk management culture rather than a due diligence culture is preventing them from effectively identifying and remediate modern slavery
To what extent the EU Forced Labour Regulation will be able to meet its objective of eliminating forced labour from supply chains
What the glove manufacturer Ansell gets right in its modern slavery report
The potential future of modern slavery legislation: companies having to demonstrate the modern slavery is not in their supply chains if they are based in high-risk areas
Why John has changed his mind on boycotting the chocolate industry altogether
Listen in and follow us on LinkedIn and Youtube!
The Taskforce on Inequality and Social-related Financial Disclosures (TISFD) wants to do for social issues what the TCFD did for climate a decade ago: harness capital markets to drive corporate action, this time on inequality and people-related risk.
With its beta framework now open for public consultation (deadline 31 July 2026), host Richard Howitt sits down with TISFD Executive Director Simon Rawson to ask the hard questions:
Can financial value really be assigned to fundamental human rights?
Does the framework take a single or double materiality approach?
With regulators like the ISSB and the EU (through CSRD/ESRS) seemingly retreating from ambitious social reporting requirements, is TISFD swimming against the tide?
Rawson explains how the framework builds on (rather than duplicates) existing initiatives like the World Benchmarking Alliance, GRI, and Social Value International, and why the taskforce insists that human rights, social capital, and wellbeing paradigms must operate side by side rather than substitute for one another. He also shares which companies (including Coca-Cola and Airbus) have already joined the TISFD alliance, how a market-led approach helped TCFD win its case for climate disclosure, and what he learned from his own career path (from British diplomat in Pakistan to NGO campaigner to task force leader) about what's really at stake for informal and vulnerable workers on the ground.
Listen to this conversation about whether business can be convinced that people, not just the planet, belong on the balance sheet of risk.
How effectively have German firms been implementing the LkSG?
In this episode of Frankly Speaking, Richard Howitt was joined by Sarah Hechler, consultant at the German Helpdesk on Business and Human Rights (Helpdesk Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte) and previously Social Project Manager at the UN Global Compact Netzwerk Deutschland, which has just published the first comprehensive study of the implementation of the German supply chain due diligence Act, the LkSG. Also joining this episode was Christopher Bayer, Senior Researcher on the study and Principal Investigator at Development International.
Together they revealed the overarching findings of their study, especially on which areas companies demonstrate strong performance on HREDD, and where they are falling behind. You’ll also hear about:
The widespread lack of effective measurement mechanisms amongst German companies for tracking progress on human rights
The main differences between due diligence laws across the world, including the French 'Devoir de diligence' and the US Dodd-Frank Act
The EU Commission's ongoing open consultation on guidelines on the Corporate Due Diligence Directive
Christopher and Sarah's key advice to businesses on how to carry out effective due diligence, based on the findings of their research
Listen in and follow us on LinkedIn and Youtube!
We often hear about the backlash against sustainability and business and human rights in the United States, but does the perception reflect the reality when it comes to actual business practice?
In this episode of Frankly Speaking, Richard Howitt was joined by Bennett Freeman, former US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor and Associate Fellow at the think tank Chatham House, as well as Senior Fellow at UC Berkeley, and Chloe Cole, Senior Researcher in US Business and Human Rights at the Business and Human Rights Centre.
Together they discussed the findings of the Centre's just-published research on how 54 large US companies have reacted to the changed American political environment, entitled: "Retreat or respect? Diverging corporate paths on human rights in a time of turbulence."
You’ll hear about:
The three main ways top US firms have responded to the backlash – the good, the bad and the ugly
The positive role played by several US companies in response to the violence of ICE officials in Minnesota in January
Big Oil's aggressive lobbying against the EU CDDDD
The corporate attempt to silence environmental NGOs, such as Energy Transfer's lawsuit against Greenpeace
Why companies choosing silence is not a neutral choice
The ultimate aim of the research: to encourage companies to keep going in their improving business and human rights
Listen in and follow us on LinkedIn and Youtube!
From Responsible Business to Responsible AI: what you need to know and do. In this episode of Frankly Speaking, Richard Howitt is joined by two leading voices on AI and responsibility to cut through the hype and the fear around artificial intelligence and its environmental impact. From staggering data centre energy figures to algorithmic bias in HR tools, this conversation is essential listening for anyone in a sustainability or responsible business role who is trying to make sense of AI, and what their company should actually be doing about it.
Kathryn Dovey is the Founder of Recalibrate, working on responsible business issues. She spent ten years at the OECD Centre for Responsible Business Conduct, including the period in which the OECD AI Principles were agreed. She is also the Founder of the career coaching consultancy Fallow Time.
Alex de Vries-Gao is a data scientist and researcher at the Institute for Environmental Studies at VU Amsterdam, where he has undertaken extensive research on the environmental impact of AI.
You will also hear about:
How major US tech companies successfully lobbied the European Commission to keep environmental data from individual data centres out of the public domain
The significant positive use cases for AI in sustainability from satellite data analysis tracking climate change and biodiversity, to breakthroughs in healthcare
Why the Global South risks bearing the environmental costs of data centres while the benefits flow predominantly to the Global North, and how this echoes patterns seen with large infrastructure projects throughout history
The key frameworks companies need to understand: the OECD AI Principles, the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, and the EU AI Act, and why the EU AI Act is a practical benchmark to start working towards now, even as it undergoes its simplification process
Listen in and follow us on LinkedIn and Youtube!
From the publisher's feed

101 Listeners

458 Listeners

61 Listeners

76 Listeners

701 Listeners

4 Listeners

3 Listeners

358 Listeners

3,043 Listeners

193 Listeners

229 Listeners

836 Listeners

2,229 Listeners

1 Listeners

100 Listeners