
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Supreme Court on January 27, asked the government to explain why a law meant to protect the transgender community requires a magistrate’s certificate as a prior condition for the State to even identify a transperson. The court was responding to a petition filed by Swati Bidhan Baruah, an Assam-based advocate and transgender rights activist. As this story develops, here's our podcast on the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, when it was made into law by Parliament in November last year. This podcast looks at which provisions in the Bill are problematic and why it was met by protests from activists and the transgender community, who said it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.
Guest: Ramya Kannan, Chief of Bureau, T.N., The Hindu
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By The Hindu4.5
3737 ratings
The Supreme Court on January 27, asked the government to explain why a law meant to protect the transgender community requires a magistrate’s certificate as a prior condition for the State to even identify a transperson. The court was responding to a petition filed by Swati Bidhan Baruah, an Assam-based advocate and transgender rights activist. As this story develops, here's our podcast on the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, when it was made into law by Parliament in November last year. This podcast looks at which provisions in the Bill are problematic and why it was met by protests from activists and the transgender community, who said it showed a poor understanding of gender and sexual identity.
Guest: Ramya Kannan, Chief of Bureau, T.N., The Hindu
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

157 Listeners

14 Listeners

57 Listeners

55 Listeners

89 Listeners

105 Listeners

40 Listeners

22 Listeners

12 Listeners

5 Listeners

15 Listeners

9 Listeners

11 Listeners

94 Listeners

10 Listeners