Are our current farming practices unsustainable? If so, how do we make them sustainable? Academic freedom enables researchers to pursue their work unencumbered by outside influence, but it's also abused by activist academics who promote unscientific ideas. How do we protect well-meaning scientists without allowing fringe voices to promote nonsense? Alternative health proponents have a new villain in their sights: a compound naturally in plants called oxalate. Is it really as bad as they claim? Nope.
Podcast
Video
Join geneticist Kevin Folta and GLP contributor Cameron English on episode 200 of Science Facts and Fallacies as they break down these latest news stories:
* Viewpoint: Can large-scale agriculture overcome stigma it is not sustainable? Here’s a 10-step regulatory guide to make that happen
In order to feed a growing global population, we need to increase crop yields while reducing inputs and the environmental footprint of agriculture, says risk assessment expert Dr. David Zaruk. The Brussels-based researcher has advanced a 10-point plan that he says will help policymakers avoid "an increasing number of famines, food insecurity, migration and social strife" that could result if leaders in the European Union and elsewhere continue to promote large-scale organic farming, which is embraced for the sake of virtue signaling, not science. One important question remains: will the plan actually work?
* Viewpoint: MIT turns blind eye to misinformation on agricultural biotechnology and vaccines promoted by ‘infamous crank’ computer scientist Stephanie Seneff
Here's the dilemma: Academic freedom ensures that scientists can pursue their research wherever the data leads. Unfortunately, this concept has been abused by activists with university appointments, who use their institution's credibility to promote outright harmful ideas. Paradoxically, some schools have refused to defend researchers who do good work while allowing fringe voices in the academy to vocally deny the benefits of vaccination and proclaim that innocuous pesticides cause autism, among other scientifically dubious assertions. Is there a way to preserve academic freedom and prevent activist academics from spreading nonsense?
Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.
SIGN UP
* Dietary bogeyman? Is oxalate the root of dozens of food-related diseases — ...