
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The title this week is more literal than figurative, as we cover Ramirez v. Collier, a case which asks whether someone receiving the death penalty is Constitutionally required to have a religious figure of their choosing physically touching the person and audibly praying. The law starts at (16:20), but the intro is more about practicing criminal law, as opposed to like whether seafood belongs in ravioli.
By The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court4.4
230230 ratings
The title this week is more literal than figurative, as we cover Ramirez v. Collier, a case which asks whether someone receiving the death penalty is Constitutionally required to have a religious figure of their choosing physically touching the person and audibly praying. The law starts at (16:20), but the intro is more about practicing criminal law, as opposed to like whether seafood belongs in ravioli.

32,120 Listeners

8,464 Listeners

5,094 Listeners

3,495 Listeners

998 Listeners

374 Listeners

1,119 Listeners

3,563 Listeners

245 Listeners

2,534 Listeners

1,483 Listeners

5,761 Listeners

730 Listeners

381 Listeners

737 Listeners