
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
TLDR: Select candidates heterogeneously, then give them all a very hard test, only continue with candidates that do very well (accept that you lose some good ones), then briefly judge on interviews/whatever.
I'm no expert but I've made some recommendations that turned out pretty well -- maybe like 5 ever. This post would probably be better if I waited 10 years to write it. Nonetheless, I think my method is far better than what most orgs/corps do. I have not seen a post on this subject on LW. If you have had mad hiring success (judging by what your org accomplished) then please comment!
Prereqs:
---
Outline:
(02:34) Do look at performance
(04:18) Accept noise
(05:25) Dont look at anything else (yet)
(07:46) Except that they work hard
(08:34) Conclusion
---
First published:
Source:
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
TLDR: Select candidates heterogeneously, then give them all a very hard test, only continue with candidates that do very well (accept that you lose some good ones), then briefly judge on interviews/whatever.
I'm no expert but I've made some recommendations that turned out pretty well -- maybe like 5 ever. This post would probably be better if I waited 10 years to write it. Nonetheless, I think my method is far better than what most orgs/corps do. I have not seen a post on this subject on LW. If you have had mad hiring success (judging by what your org accomplished) then please comment!
Prereqs:
---
Outline:
(02:34) Do look at performance
(04:18) Accept noise
(05:25) Dont look at anything else (yet)
(07:46) Except that they work hard
(08:34) Conclusion
---
First published:
Source:
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
26,409 Listeners
2,387 Listeners
7,908 Listeners
4,131 Listeners
87 Listeners
1,457 Listeners
9,042 Listeners
87 Listeners
388 Listeners
5,432 Listeners
15,201 Listeners
474 Listeners
122 Listeners
75 Listeners
454 Listeners