In this fourth and final episode of the Land of Opportunity series, a partnership between the Institute of Economic Affairs and Land of Opportunity, former MP Sir Philip Davies speaks with Tim Phillips, former president of Americans for Prosperity. The conversation explores how Phillips and the Koch brothers built one of the most successful grassroots campaigns in American history—mobilizing millions of citizens to fight for economic freedom, lower taxes, and reduced regulation. Phillips explains how Americans for Prosperity was never about lobbying for specific industries, but rather building a genuine grassroots army for the ideals of economic freedom that would allow entrepreneurship and opportunity to flourish for Americans from any background. The organization pioneered community organizing on the right, recruiting and training activists at the local level to advocate for pro-growth policies across all fifty states.

Phillips reveals the strategic decisions behind the movement’s success, including why they chose to be “for” prosperity rather than “against” something, how they defended policies by making economic arguments rather than moral ones, and why running entrepreneur candidates against incumbents proved so effective at changing political behavior. The discussion covers Americans for Prosperity’s role in the Tea Party movement, their fights for education reform and tax cuts including the 2017 Trump tax reforms, and how they overcame attacks of being “astroturf” by simply building undeniable grassroots strength with thousands at rallies and hundreds knocking doors every weekend. Phillips shares insights on federal competition between states, explaining how low-tax states like Texas and Florida are gaining congressional seats and political power while high-tax states like California and New York hemorrhage population—creating a feedback loop that rewards pro-growth policies with increased representation.

The episode concludes with Phillips’s direct advice for Britain: the Conservative Party has lost its way by offering “pale pastels” instead of “bold colours” on issues like net zero and energy costs, where British entrepreneurs now pay four times what Texans pay for electricity. Phillips argues that prosperity must be created by culture and political philosophy, not just individual policies, and that Britain has all the ingredients—world-class talent, innovation, and entrepreneurial spirit—but needs leaders willing to raise the banner for economic freedom. Davies and Phillips reflect on the key insight that human nature is universal: everywhere, people want to belong to something bigger, want their voices heard, and want to make a difference for their families and country. The challenge for Britain is adapting that universal truth to local culture and building a movement that celebrates aspiration, rewards success, and treats economic freedom as a bipartisan priority—just as America has with the American Dream.

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Head of Media and Linda Whetstone Scholar Reem Ibrahim interviews Lord Toby Young, journalist, author, and founder of the Free Speech Union. The conversation examines the erosion of free speech in Britain, exploring how Young’s own cancellation in 2018 led him to establish an organisation dedicated to protecting freedom of expression. They discuss the legislative landscape that has restricted speech rights, particularly the Online Safety Act and the problematic use of existing laws like the Malicious Communications Act and Public Order Act to prosecute individuals for their views.

Young argues that the current government’s crackdown on free speech stems from a collapsing faith in multiculturalism and fear of populist movements like Reform UK. He explains how authorities are increasingly using censorship rather than engaging in public debate about immigration and other contentious issues. The interview covers specific cases the Free Speech Union has defended, including individuals arrested for social media posts and silent prayer outside abortion clinics. Young criticises the police’s handling of non-crime hate incidents, noting that over 60 are recorded daily despite attempts at reform.

The discussion concludes with Young’s perspective on whether Britain needs its own First Amendment. He advocates for repealing restrictive speech laws and establishing constitutional protections similar to those in the United States, while acknowledging the challenges posed by parliamentary sovereignty and judicial interpretation. Despite his concerns about the current state of civil liberties, Young expresses cautious optimism that a future government might prioritise restoring free speech rights, particularly if the British public can be persuaded of their fundamental importance.

Tom Clougherty, Former Executive Director of the Institute of Economic Affairs, hosts a Conservative Party Conference panel discussion on Britain’s tax system and its impact on wealth creators. Joining him are John O’Connell, Chief Executive of the Taxpayers Alliance, Mark Garnier MP, Shadow Economic Secretary, Samuel Hughes, Editor at Works in Progress, and Alys Denby, Opinion and Features Editor at City AM. The panel examines how Labour’s tax policies - including changes to non-dom status, inheritance tax on global assets, and VAT on private school fees - are driving entrepreneurs and wealthy individuals overseas, with particularly stark examples of the exodus to Italy and America.

The discussion covers the complexity of Britain’s 20,000-page tax code and its damaging effects on economic growth. Mark Garnier highlights how British entrepreneurs in their twenties are taking their ideas to countries like Thailand and Vietnam, while Alys Denby reports on the collapse of London’s prime property market and high-profile non-dom departures. Samuel Hughes explains how stamp duty prevents efficient housing allocation and how the upcoming landfill levy threatens to destroy housebuilding viability across urban England. The panel proposes radical solutions including the Taxpayers Alliance’s Single Income Tax model and the abolition of inheritance tax, which polling shows is supported by over 50% across all demographics except PhD holders.

The conversation concludes with passionate audience contributions, including an entrepreneur forced to take his start-ups to America for funding and a City lawyer whose firm has hired additional Italian tax specialists to handle the exodus crisis. The panel emphasises that the Conservatives remain the only centre-right party on economics and must develop credible alternatives to Labour’s approach. They argue for policies that reward rather than punish wealth creation, with Mark Garnier warning that envy-driven taxation is forcing Britain’s most productive citizens to seek opportunities elsewhere, ultimately harming the economy and public services that tax revenue supports.

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Managing Editor Daniel Freeman is joined by Editorial Director Kristian Niemietz and Head of Labour Economics Professor Len Shackleton. The conversation covers the Green Party’s wealth tax proposals from newly elected leader Zack Polanski, rising unemployment figures in the UK particularly among young people, and this year’s Nobel Prize winners in economics and what their research tells us about economic growth.

The discussion examines why wealth taxes have been abandoned across OECD countries, with Niemietz explaining the French and West German experiences. High administration costs, valuation difficulties, and capital flight emerge as consistent problems. They address claims that asset sales from departing wealthy individuals would benefit the economy, and explore how proposals could affect far more than just billionaires. Shackleton analyses the October unemployment rise to 4.8%, connecting it to increased national insurance contributions, day-one unfair dismissal rules, and minimum wage pressures that particularly impact young workers entering the job market.

Freeman discusses the work of Nobel laureates including Joel Mokyr, whose research on the Industrial Revolution challenges common assumptions about education and skills. Rather than university graduates, it was skilled craftsmen like millwrights who proved crucial to industrialisation. The conversation draws parallels to modern policy debates around skills training, property rights, and the importance of domestic factors versus exploitation theories in explaining Western prosperity. They critique narratives attributing British wealth primarily to slavery rather than institutional and cultural factors that enabled innovation.

In this third episode of the Land of Opportunity series, a partnership between the Institute of Economic Affairs and Land of Opportunity, Andrew Barclay speaks with Alex Tarascio from Signal Polling, a leading Republican polling company in Washington. The conversation examines how Americans really feel about taxes, success, and entrepreneurship—and reveals a striking bipartisan consensus around free enterprise that simply doesn’t exist in Britain. Signal Polling’s research shows that approximately 70% of Americans, across both parties, believe in the American Dream and support free market principles. Even on the left, Americans view tax as an obstacle that deters behavior and kills jobs, not as a social contribution or patriotic duty as it’s often framed in the UK.

The discussion uncovers fascinating insights about why blue states are hemorrhaging population to red states, with California on track to lose four congressional seats by 2030 while Texas and Florida each gain four. Alex explains how this isn’t just about economics—it’s about political power, as congressional districts and Electoral College votes follow population. The polling reveals that Americans are deeply skeptical of government promises to raise taxes for better services because they simply don’t believe the money will be spent effectively. Unlike Britain, where the narrative suggests more taxes equal better public services, American voters across the political spectrum would rather have less spending, lower taxes, and fewer services because they don’t trust government to deliver value for money.

Perhaps most surprisingly, Signal Polling’s research in both the US and internationally shows that Brits are deeply envious of America’s pro-enterprise culture and the opportunities it creates. While British politicians present tax increases as necessary for public services, Americans instinctively understand that every dollar taken from business is a dollar that can’t be invested in growth, expansion, and hiring. The episode explores how polling methodology itself reveals cultural differences—Americans are more willing to express their true political views, while sophisticated polling techniques like asking “who will your neighbors vote for” help capture real sentiment. The conversation concludes with the observation that the American Dream remains a unifying cultural force that transcends party politics, while Britain lacks any equivalent shared vision of aspiration and opportunity.

In this first episode of Economy Explained, a new series from the Institute of Economic Affairs, the series examines pressing economic issues through evidence-based analysis. Economy Explained aims to provide clear, objective insights into how economic policy affects everyday life, exploring how market-oriented principles can address current challenges facing national economies.

This episode, hosted by Callum Price, Director of Communications, focuses on the UK labour market and the Labour government’s Employment Rights Bill. Price analyses three key policy changes affecting job creation: the rise in minimum wage (including a 16% increase for 18-20 year olds), the hike in employer National Insurance contributions from 13.8% to 15%, and new employment obligations through the Employment Rights Bill. He examines how these measures are increasing the cost of hiring, explores the government’s productivity arguments, and questions whether laws designed to protect workers might inadvertently reduce job opportunities. The video concludes by making the case for a more flexible labour market that balances worker protections with the ability of businesses to create employment opportunities.

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Daniel Freeman interviews Professor Bas van Bavel, a distinguished professor at the University of Utrecht and author of “The Invisible Hand: How Market Economies Have Emerged and Declined Since 500 A.D.” The conversation examines how market economies emerged in medieval Europe, why some regions developed competitive markets for land, labour and capital while others did not, and what caused Europe to pull ahead of the Middle East economically during this period. Professor van Bavel explains the crucial distinction between output markets and input markets, arguing that true market economies only emerge when there are functioning markets for the factors of production.

The discussion traces how northern Italy first developed input markets in the 10th and 11th centuries as ordinary people organised themselves to break aristocratic power, followed by similar developments in the Low Countries. They explore why urbanisation alone wasn’t decisive for market development, how security of property rights encouraged investment in expensive capital goods like mills, and the role of associational organisations in medieval European economic growth. The conversation also covers why the Islamic world, despite having advanced markets in early medieval Iraq, failed to maintain this advantage.

The interview concludes with Professor van Bavel’s analysis of how market economies tend to decline through a self-reinforcing process of wealth accumulation. He argues that wealthy elites use economic leverage to dominate markets, control states through financial means, and eventually reshape market rules to serve their interests. This pattern, he suggests, can be observed across multiple historical market economies from medieval Italy and the Low Countries to modern America. They debate whether this process is inevitable, how Britain’s relatively oligarchical 18th century led to the Industrial Revolution, and whether contemporary sclerosis in growth stems from elite capture or other factors like housing constraints.

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Head of Media Reem Ibrahim is joined by IEA Executive Director Tom Clougherty and Editorial Director Kristian Niemietz to discuss the aftermath of Conservative Party Conference. The conversation examines Kemi Badenoch’s headline announcement to abolish stamp duty land tax on primary residences, alongside the party’s proposed £47 billion in spending cuts through their new “golden rule.” They analyse why stamp duty is Britain’s most distortionary tax, costing 75p in economic damage for every pound raised, and how abolishing it could unlock a frozen property market where people now move house half as often as they did a generation ago.

The discussion turns to the Conservative Party’s commitment to maintaining the triple lock on pensions, despite it consuming over 10% of total public spending - more than education, policing and defence combined. Tom explains how the triple lock ensures state pensions will rise faster than earnings while the population ages, creating an unsustainable fiscal trajectory that could add £200 billion in today’s money to public spending by 2070. The panel explores the political tension between young Conservative activists pushing for planning liberalisation and an ageing voter base now averaging seventy years old, and whether the party can escape this electoral trap.

The conversation concludes with an examination of the Green Party conference vote to effectively abolish the private rental market through rent controls, mandatory tenant buyback schemes, and council takeovers of unsold properties. Kristian and Reem critique these proposals as ignoring basic market signals and supply constraints, arguing that similar thinking influences parts of the Labour Party. The panel makes the case that whether discussing Conservative stamp duty abolition or Green Party rental policies, the fundamental solution to Britain’s housing crisis remains the same: radical planning liberalisation to massively increase housing supply.

In this Institute of Economic Affairs event, IEA Executive Director Tom Clougherty interviews George Selgin about his new book “False Dawn: The New Deal and the Promise of Recovery, 1933-1947.” Selgin is a Senior Fellow and Former Director of the Centre for Monetary and Financial Alternatives at the Cato Institute and Professor Emeritus of Economics at the University of Georgia. The conversation examines how the US finally recovered from the Great Depression and what exact contribution the New Deal made to that recovery.

Selgin challenges conventional wisdom about the New Deal, arguing it was neither a Keynesian fiscal stimulus programme nor an exercise in monetary expansion. He explains how Roosevelt’s policies—including the National Recovery Administration’s price controls and the Agricultural Adjustment Act’s crop destruction—actually hindered recovery by artificially raising prices without increasing demand. The discussion covers the banking crisis of 1933, the role of gold flows in driving what limited recovery occurred, and the devastating 1937-38 recession caused by Federal Reserve and Treasury anti-inflation policies. Selgin also examines why the Depression finally ended, arguing it wasn’t World War II spending itself but rather the restoration of business confidence during the war that enabled the postwar investment boom.

The conversation includes discussion of Herbert Hoover’s actual policies, the distinction between relief and recovery, FDR’s opposition to monetary expansion and deposit insurance, and what Keynes himself thought about Roosevelt’s approach. Selgin concludes by explaining why free banking systems respond more appropriately to economic crises than centrally managed monetary systems.

Timestamps:

00:00 - Introduction

02:26 - Why This Book on the New Deal?

06:14 - How Severe Was the Great Depression?

08:48 - Banking Crisis and Money Supply Collapse

15:13 - FDR’s Inauguration and Bank Holiday

25:09 - Gold Standard and FDR’s Monetary Policy

31:12 - Not Keynesian Fiscal Stimulus

34:32 - Hitler’s Gold Drove Recovery

42:28 - The Real New Deal: Price Controls

48:37 - Agriculture Policy: Paying Farmers Not to Produce

58:11 - What Really Ended the Depression

01:02:19 - Business Confidence, Not War Spending

01:05:23 - Keynes Was Right About Roosevelt

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Head of Media and Communications Reem Ibrahim is joined by Executive Director Tom Clougherty and Editorial Director Kristian Niemietz to discuss the aftermath of the Labour Party conference. The conversation examines Rachel Reeves’s speech as Chancellor, analysing her dual messaging that attempts to position Labour both as a left-wing alternative to the Conservatives and as the pro-business, fiscally responsible party against Reform. They discuss the notable absence of tax policy details ahead of the autumn budget, the focus on initiatives like school breakfast clubs rather than substantive economic strategy, and concerns that the government prioritises state spending over genuine growth-promoting reforms.

The discussion turns to Labour’s approach to economic inactivity and youth unemployment, particularly Rachel Reeves’s job guarantee scheme. The panel critiques this workfare-style program as misdiagnosing the problem, noting that the real issue lies in the massive increase in disability and incapacity benefit claims rather than conventional unemployment. They examine how government policies like increased employer National Insurance contributions, higher minimum wages, and employment rights reforms are making it more expensive and riskier to hire young people, while the job guarantee scheme fails to address these fundamental barriers to employment.

The podcast concludes with analysis of recent climate and health policy announcements. Ed Miliband’s pledge to ban fracking is discussed as largely symbolic given existing regulatory barriers, while the panel examines how high energy costs resulting from climate policies are hampering UK economic competitiveness. They also critique the government’s implementation of restrictions on buy-one-get-one-free deals for foods high in fat, salt and sugar, arguing this “bogof ban” will add hundreds of pounds to family food bills during a cost of living crisis without meaningful evidence of reducing obesity. The conversation highlights how regulatory overreach across multiple policy areas reflects a broader pattern of state expansion that prioritises activist agendas over economic growth and consumer freedom.