
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This episode is a tale in two-parts. The first is about Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, which discusses whether a ban on political robo-calls violates the First Amendment. The second is Brett and Nazim discussing multiple questions about pasta. Even by our standards, there's a lot of tangents here. The law starts in earnest at (10:45).
By The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court4.4
230230 ratings
This episode is a tale in two-parts. The first is about Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, which discusses whether a ban on political robo-calls violates the First Amendment. The second is Brett and Nazim discussing multiple questions about pasta. Even by our standards, there's a lot of tangents here. The law starts in earnest at (10:45).

32,079 Listeners

8,469 Listeners

5,081 Listeners

3,486 Listeners

1,003 Listeners

376 Listeners

1,120 Listeners

3,564 Listeners

245 Listeners

2,533 Listeners

1,483 Listeners

5,742 Listeners

729 Listeners

383 Listeners

737 Listeners