
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute and Forbes columnist, provided a comprehensive overview of recent public policy changes affecting older adults. Drawing from his expertise in aging and tax policy—stemmed from personal caregiving experiences—Gleckman analyzed the implications of the Trump administration's "big beautiful bill" and related executive actions as of August 2025. The focus was on Medicaid and Medicare reforms, which could reshape long-term care, costs, and access for millions of seniors and people with disabilities.
Medicaid, which supports about 7.2 million seniors and 4.8 million younger disabled individuals (dual eligibles), faces a $1 trillion reduction in federal spending over the next decade. Key changes include:
Gleckman emphasized that states may prioritize institutional care over community-based options, potentially worsening outcomes for older adults preferring to age at home.
Despite campaign promises to protect Medicare, changes aim to curb fraud, boost efficiency, and emphasize prevention—but at the risk of higher costs and reduced access:
Gleckman noted deregulation of nursing homes (e.g., rolling back transparency rules) and potential reductions in Medicare Advantage supplemental benefits like gym memberships due to insurer financial pressures.
By Positive Aging Community - Steve Gurney4.9
77 ratings
Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute and Forbes columnist, provided a comprehensive overview of recent public policy changes affecting older adults. Drawing from his expertise in aging and tax policy—stemmed from personal caregiving experiences—Gleckman analyzed the implications of the Trump administration's "big beautiful bill" and related executive actions as of August 2025. The focus was on Medicaid and Medicare reforms, which could reshape long-term care, costs, and access for millions of seniors and people with disabilities.
Medicaid, which supports about 7.2 million seniors and 4.8 million younger disabled individuals (dual eligibles), faces a $1 trillion reduction in federal spending over the next decade. Key changes include:
Gleckman emphasized that states may prioritize institutional care over community-based options, potentially worsening outcomes for older adults preferring to age at home.
Despite campaign promises to protect Medicare, changes aim to curb fraud, boost efficiency, and emphasize prevention—but at the risk of higher costs and reduced access:
Gleckman noted deregulation of nursing homes (e.g., rolling back transparency rules) and potential reductions in Medicare Advantage supplemental benefits like gym memberships due to insurer financial pressures.

27,122 Listeners

1,465 Listeners

30,185 Listeners

12,700 Listeners

112,200 Listeners

56,496 Listeners

5,409 Listeners

388 Listeners

9,925 Listeners

12 Listeners

53 Listeners

51 Listeners