
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


America's favorite game returns, as Brett and Nazim decide whether Garza v. Idaho (can a lawyer override a client's request for an appeal when the client waived appellate rights pursuant to a plea agreement) constitutes Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, along with a few other half-explained scenarios. The law technically starts from the beginning but them goes on some kind of weird Mozzarella stick tangent before starting again at (09:28).
By The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court4.4
230230 ratings
America's favorite game returns, as Brett and Nazim decide whether Garza v. Idaho (can a lawyer override a client's request for an appeal when the client waived appellate rights pursuant to a plea agreement) constitutes Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, along with a few other half-explained scenarios. The law technically starts from the beginning but them goes on some kind of weird Mozzarella stick tangent before starting again at (09:28).

32,082 Listeners

8,466 Listeners

5,085 Listeners

3,491 Listeners

1,003 Listeners

374 Listeners

1,118 Listeners

3,562 Listeners

245 Listeners

2,535 Listeners

1,482 Listeners

5,757 Listeners

731 Listeners

384 Listeners

737 Listeners