Judge Mathis Podcast

First, The plaintiff met the defendant at a party, and she says they started dating. However, the plaintiff is suing the defendant because she claims she purchased a car from the defendant, but it broke down four days later. The defendant insists he never dated the plaintiff, and he’s only seen her three times in his entire life. The defendant believes he doesn’t owe the plaintiff anything because he told her he’d help repair the vehicle if it broke down.

Then, The plaintiff’s daughter, the defendant, asked her mother for a loan to purchase a home. Unfortunately, the plaintiff says her daughter stopped making payments, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant admits she asked to borrow money, but she insists the loan was a gift.

Plus, The plaintiff allowed the defendant to move in with him, but he claims the defendant began having sex with their other roommate and did drugs in their home. The plaintiff alleges the defendant lost his job and stopped paying rent for several months, so he’s suing. The defendant admits he owes rent, but he insists the plaintiff allowed him to do chores in exchange for a place to live.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff asked the defendant, her friend, to cash in a $5,000 check she won in the lottery. Unfortunately, the plaintiff says her friend kept the money, so she is suing. The defendant insists the winning ticket didn’t belong to the plaintiff.

Then, The plaintiff gave her daughter, the defendant, money to purchase a car. However, the plaintiff claims her daughter totaled the vehicle and failed to make the payments, so she’s suing. The defendant denies owing because she says her mother forgave the debt.

Plus, The plaintiff used to be friends with the defendant. She says she sold the defendant a motorcycle, but he failed to make the full payments, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists they agreed upon a lower sale price than the plaintiff claims.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff rented a room in the defendant’s apartment. Their relationship went downhill after the plaintiff caught the defendant shooting a porno in their home. The plaintiff says he gave the defendant a loan to help with rent, but he has yet to be repaid, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists she told the plaintiff she couldn’t pay back the loan, and she is countersuing for harassment.

Then, The plaintiff and defendant used to date, and they share a child. The plaintiff claims the defendant illegally withheld the title of her car after their breakup, so she’s suing. The defendant insists he withheld the title because the plaintiff won’t allow him to see his child.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff and defendant share a child. However, the plaintiff believes his girlfriend cheated on him at the time of conception, so he has petitioned the court for a DNA test. The defendant has no doubts the plaintiff is the father.

Then, The plaintiff claims her nephew drove her car without permission even though his license had been revoked. A police officer pulled over the defendant while he was driving the car, and it was impounded, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says his aunt gave him permission to drive her car, and she even asked for a ride.

Plus, The plaintiff claims her ex-boyfriend kicked in her window and assaulted her in front of her son during a jealous rage one night. The plaintiff is suing her ex for the attack and defamation. The defendant believes he had reason to be jealous because he saw another man climbing out of the plaintiff’s window. The defendant denies he broke the window and insists the plaintiff initially attacked him.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff met the defendant on a dating site, but they realized they were better off as friends and became platonic roommates. The plaintiff claims the defendant gave him several bad checks for rent, so he’s suing. The defendant argues he lost his job, and the plaintiff began harassing him.

Then, The plaintiff used to date the defendant, but she claims he was moody, and their relationship was on and off. The plaintiff and defendant share a 5-month-old baby, but the defendant denies he’s the father, so the plaintiff has petitioned the court for a paternity test. The defendant has doubts about the paternity because he says he and the plaintiff weren’t having sex when the baby was conceived.

Plus, The plaintiff claims she sold her daughter, the defendant, a car, but she has yet to be repaid, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues her mother is suing her prematurely.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff claims she and the defendant agreed to purchase Facebook portals together, but the defendant failed to pay for her portion, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says there was never a set deadline for the payment.

Plus, The plaintiff met the defendant at an AA meeting. She claims she bought a car from the defendant, but it was a lemon, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant denies owing the plaintiff because the car was perfectly fine.

Then, In this special “throwback” episode, the plaintiff claims after posing in a picture with her ex, the defendant attacked her in a jealous rage with a pair of scissors, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists she was only acting in defense after the plaintiff had punched her

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff claims she gave her son’s girlfriend money to help her through hard times but has yet to be repaid, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues that the money was a gift, and she never agreed to pay it back.

Then, The plaintiff hired the defendant to give him a tattoo. However, the plaintiff claims the defendant drew on the tattoo backwards, so he’s suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff approved the stencil when it was on his skin, and he’s countersuing for defamation.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff never knew her father. She was told he had passed away, so the plaintiff has petitioned the court to see if the defendants are her half-sisters. The defendants are eager to find out if they have another sister.

Then, While together, the plaintiff claims she paid her ex-boyfriend to buy her a car and put it in his name because her credit was shot. However, the plaintiff alleges the defendant took the vehicle, so she’s suing him. The defendant insists the plaintiff used money from their joint account, so the car is technically theirs.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First,The plaintiff hired the defendant to be the photographer at his 50th birthday party. The plaintiff says he was unhappy with the pictures, so he’s suing for a refund. The defendant insists he took plenty of great photos, and the plaintiff made irrational demands.

Then, The plaintiff claims the defendant owes him money for a security deposit, so he’s suing. The defendant says she returned part of the deposit, but she withheld some for damages. The defendant is countersuing for emotional distress because the plaintiff often brought women home and didn’t tell her he was on probation for drug charges.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff says he gave his son money to fix his teeth but has yet to be repaid in full, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims he fell behind on paying back the loan because his father wrongfully fired him from his job.

Then, Growing up, the plaintiff was told one man was his father. However, after the plaintiff had his own child, his mother told him another man was his biological father, so the plaintiff has petitioned the court for a sibling DNA test. The defendant’s father admitted he hooked up with the plaintiff’s mother, but he refused to take the paternity test, so the defendant is in court instead.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices