Kathy's InDieZoNe

Federal Court Link RE: Hearing/Public Access Zoom Information:https://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/content/goncalves-et-al-v-washington-state-university-0Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the 1st hearing set in the high-profile federal case styled as Goncalves et al. v. Washington State University and what may be expected to possibly occur at the Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 pre-trial conference before Judge Evanson.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#WSU

#Idaho4

#FirstAmendment

#FreeSpeech

Federal Court Link RE: Hearing/Public Access Zoom Information:

https://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/content/goncalves-et-al-v-washington-state-university

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by Washington State University in the matters styled as Goncalves et al. v. WSU leaving open the possibility that they may file counterclaims against Plaintiffs, raising the issue that there may be other third parties responsibility for any damages over and above Mr. Kohberger, and ask for the court to award them their costs to defense the lawsuit and also their attorney's fees. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide an update on the status of the Respondents request to dismiss the public records lawsuit styled as EWU Media LLC v. City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept.

EWU Media LLC has alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. Defendants Moscow/MPD have moved the court for the entry of an order of dismissal, to effectively toss the case out of court. This is a current status of the case. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#EWUMedia

#EWUvMoscow

#FreeSpeech

#FreePress

#Idaho4

On May 22, 2026, an 11th Circuit Court of Appeal's judicial oversight committee found that a federal court judge who engaged in misconduct in chambers for approximately two years with a high-ranking law enforcement officer in ear shot of several employees would receive a private reprimand.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the court-ordered Joint Status Report which was filed by the parties on May 26, 2026 in the high-profile federal civil lawsuit styled as Steve Goncalves et al. v. Washington State University. What does it say? LINK TO SCHEDULING REPORT on YT community page (May 27, 2026)

----) https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/postsEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the high-profile federal civil lawsuit styled as Goncalves et al. vs. Washington State University. The same has been proceeding since late January 2026 before U.S. District Court Judge Evanson following Judge Evanson's April 14, 2026 court order regarding the filing of the Joint Status Report by the parties. The Plaintiffs are the personal representatives of the estates of four students who were catastrophically lost on November 13, 2022 at 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho. As the parties have now filed their court ordered joint status report, some are asking if it is possible Mr. Kohberger might be scheduled to sit for a non-party deposition?

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.

#Idaho4

#WashingtonStateUniversity

#TitleIX

#BryanKohberger

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the court-ordered Joint Status Report which was filed by the parties on May 26, 2026 in the high-profile federal civil lawsuit styled as Steve Goncalves et al. v. Washington State University.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger which remains largely under seal nearly a year since Mr. Kohberger pled guilty to all five of the first degree felonies he was to stand trial for in August 2025.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#BryanKohberger

#IdahovKohberger

#FirstAmendment

#FreeSpeech

#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning a court case that has been opened in Pasco County, Florida styled as Florida v. Jonathan Lee Riches. We provide an update relying on the First Amendment which is quoted to and cited in this presentation regarding this matter that has been brought against the popular true crime content creator, JLR, concerning an arraignment scheduled to occur on June 2, 2026 regarding a one count battery charge.

Link to our prior presentation described herein:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHyp2i4noEg Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. A defendant in a criminal proceeding is clocked with the presumption of innocence at all times relevant until or unless he/she pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law. The government bears the burden of proof at beyond a reasonable doubt evidentiary standard to prove all elements of any alleged crime charged.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger where after asserting he was not guilty for years, Mr. Kohberger plead guilty on July 2, 2025 to all charges brought against him rather than go to trial. We address one of the last orders entered in the case on June 26, 2025 and discuss the court's findings on what defense had stated concerning the status of discovery. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#Idaho4

#Discovery

#FreeSpeech

#BryanKohberger

#FirstAmendment