Kathy's InDieZoNe

Link to YT channel addressed in this presentation: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZ...

Here we discuss for educational purposes and based on pure opinions, commentary and speculations pursuant to Amend. I, US Const. why the S.C. high court reversed these two convictions and remanded for a new trial based on due process of law. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025 when Mr. Kohberger was transferred to an Idaho State maximum security prison to begin serving his four (4) life sentences. Here we provide pure opinions, comments and speculation concerning the "secret" docket still sealed to the public. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

The high-profile yet highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger proceeded in Idaho state court for over 2.5 years until July 2025 when Mr. Kohberger agreed to plead guilty to all charges brought by a criminal indictment returned by an Idaho grand jury charging him with five first degree felony counts concerning the catastrophic events of November 13, 2022.

In February 2026, a lawsuit was filed by EWU Media LLC who City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. alleging the City of Moscow/MPD wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests.

At the May 18, 2026 hearing before Judge Marshall, the court noted the Respondents have sought to dismiss the lawsuit. This is an update on the status of the proceeding.

Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. 

#Idaho4

#EWUvMoscow

#IdahovKohberger

#BryanKohberger

#FirstAmendment

#FreeSpeech

#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the civil defamation case styled as Macron v. Owens, where the President and First Lady of France have sued podcaster Candace Owens alleging the defendant defamed Ms. Macron by claiming she was born a man, "switched" identities with a male, and has engaged in other acts of defamation against her. Here in providing pure opinions, commentary and speculation per the First Amendment which is cited to and quoted, we also note the Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss the Lawsuit which is pending hearing.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#CandaceOwens

#PresidentMacron

#FirstLadyMacron

#FreeSpeech

#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation based on the First Amendment concerning the high profile, highly-sealed criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger deemed closed on July 23, 2025 when Mr. Kohberger was sentenced and the case closed. On December 18, 2025, Judge Steven J. Hippler ordered the unsealing of dozens of sealed documents from January through March 2025. This past week, one of those filings, exhibits in support of defense motion in limine number 7 (witness identification by bushy eyebrows). Within the same, appear several of those documents . Here we discuss, provide opinions, commentary and pure speculation as to the contents of one - a transcript of an interview conducted by Moscow Police Department first responding officer Mitch Nunes, shortly after his arrival when the mystery of a locked room unaccessible to the MPD during the search inside 1122 is addressed.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment is cited to and quoted in this presentation. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#Idaho4

#IdahovKohberger

#BryanKohberger

#FirstAmendment

#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the status of the lawsuit styled as Goncalves et al v. Washington State University regarding two new filings dated June 4, 2026 from the court concerning a change in judge.

LINK to our YT Community Page: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/posts

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide our pure opinions and commentary considering recent events occurring that has reignited conversation the crimes could not have been committed by 1 person. We revisiting a report written by an Idaho State Police Detective documenting surveillance of 2 Whitman County, Washington storage facilities by 3 ISP Detectives on Dec. 28-29, 2022 with Mr. Kohberger having left Whitman County over two weeks earlier on or about Dec. 13, 2022.

Pure opinions, comments, and rhetorical questions are proffered of who were the detectives hoping to possibly catch accessing those facilities with Mr. Kohberger 2500 miles away in Pennsylvania: Was an Alt. Perp, an Accessory Before or After-theFact or a Co-Conspirator suspected concerning the investigation into 1122 King Road.

Last Year's Presentation Discussed in this podcast episode:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUBrnoVhr90This educational presentation commences with a citation directly to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Everything here represents the host's pure opinions and commentary pursuant to Amend. I, U.S. Constitution (freedom of speech and the press). It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

According to the First Amendment, U.S. Constitution: 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." - Amend. I, U.S. Const.

#BryanKohberger

#ISP

#Idaho4

#FirstAmendment

#FreeSpeech

#FreePress

Idaho v. Kohberger was a high-profile, highly-sealed criminal case which proceeded in state court for over 2.5 years until July 2025 when Mr. Kohberger to the surprise of many agreed to plead guilty to all charges brought by a criminal indictment returned by an Idaho grand jury. A lawsuit has been filed by EWU Media LLC who has alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. At the August 18, 2026 hearing before Judge Marshall, the court noted the Respondents have sought to dismiss the lawsuit. This is an update on the status of the proceeding.Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. 

Idaho v. Kohberger was a high-profile, highly-sealed criminal case which proceeded in state court for over 2.5 years until July 2025 when Mr. Kohberger to the surprise of many agreed to plead guilty to all charges brought by a criminal indictment returned by an Idaho grand jury. When he did so he agreed to waive all appellate rights. Efforts were made including by the media in July 2025 to persuade Judge Steven J. Hippler to unseal the case, citing to the First Amend., with the Declaration of AP Journalist/University of Idaho graduate Rebecca Boone in support.

Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Ask