Kathy's InDieZoNe

Here we provide an update and pure opinions and comments concerning an upcoming May 18, 2026 hearing on a public records lawsuit before Judge Megan E. Marshall - EWU Media LLC vs. City of Moscow/Moscow Police Department. The Plaintiffs from last year's Laramie et al. vs. City of Moscow who obtained a partial permanent injunction against the City of Moscow from releasing certain images from the MPD's investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Rd. on November 13, 2022 are the intervenors in this case.

1. Link to Hearing Livestream May 18, 2026:

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/Stream/District-2/Hon-Megan-Marshall.html

2. Link to our pre-Hearing YT Live Event May 18, 2026:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_VCvrZrnf4

3. Link to our EWU v. Moscow Playlist RE the case:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbLUtgSDXdFPt8nqgkLpSBcZFxtS2cYep

Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. First AmendmentCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#EWUMedia

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#FreeSpeech

#FreePress

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger concerning a court order rendered December 18, 2025 directing that dozens of documents were to be released to the public in the long-closed highly-sealed case and ask the rhetorical question of what's changed in the highly sealed case? Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide an update and opinions concerning an upcoming May 18, 2026 hearing on a public records lawsuit before Judge Megan E. Marshall - EWU Media LLC vs. City of Moscow/Moscow Police Department. This is the first known lawsuit that we understand has been filed by a party seeking via public records requests concerning the investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Road and Idaho v. Kohberger.

EWU v. Moscow/MPD Playlist discussed in this podcast episode:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbLUtgSDXdFPt8nqgkLpSBcZFxtS2cYep

Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. First AmendmentCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#Idaho4

#EWUMedia

#BryanKohberger

#FreeSpeech

Here, we provided opinions, commentary and speculation regarding the appeal styled as Richard Allen v. State of Indiana discussing the status of the appeal. This is the high profile "Delphi case" where Appellant is seeking a new trial or in the alternative remanding to the trial court for a "Franks" hearing. We discuss an appellate order entered on May 14, 2026 granting Mr. Allen's motion for oral argument and address the three reasons proffered by him in that motion which persuaded the appellate panel oral argument should be granted. The May 14, 2026 appellate order and April 28, 2026 Motion for Oral Argument (public records) appear on our YT channel here: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZ...

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#RichardAllen

#DelphiAppeal

#AllenvIndiana

#AbbyandLibby

#FreeSpeech

Here, we provided opinions, commentary and speculation regarding the appeal styled as Richard Allen v. State of Indiana discussing the status of the appeal. This is the high profile "Delphi case" where Appellant is seeking a new trial or in the alternative remanding to the trial court for a "Franks" hearing.

We discuss here an order entered on May 14, 2026 granting Mr. Allen's motion for oral argument and opine why it is becoming unlikely Judge Frances Gull will continue to preside as trial judge in the event of reversal.

The May 14, 2026 appellate order (a public record) appears on our YT channel here: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/postsThe Allen v. Indiana complete docket is available for the public's review free of charge here: https://public.courts.in.gov/mycase/#...Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#AllenvIN

#AbbyandLibby

#RichardAllen

#FreeSpeech

#FreePress

Here we provide an update and opinions concerning an upcoming May 18, 2026 hearing on a public records lawsuit before Judge Megan E. Marshall - EWU Media LLC vs. City of Moscow/Moscow Police Department. The Plaintiffs from last year's Laramie et al. vs. City of Moscow successfully obtaining an injunction against the City of Moscow from releasing certain images from the MPD's investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Road on November 13, 2022.

Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. First AmendmentCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

EWU v. Moscow/MPD Playlist:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbLUtgSDXdFPt8nqgkLpSBcZFxtS2cYep

In a unanimous ruling by the justices of the South Carolina Supreme Court, two convictions returned against the defendant in the matter styled as South Carolina v. Richard "Alex" Murdaugh for the unalivings of his wife, Maggie, and their 22-year-old son, Paul, on June 7, 2021 have been reversed.

Everything here is the pure opinion of the host per Amend. I, US. Const.

Idaho v. Kohberger was a high-profile, highly-sealed criminal case which proceeded in state court for over 2.5 years until July 2025 when Mr. Kohberger to the surprise of many agreed to plead guilty to all charges brought by a criminal indictment returned by an Idaho grand jury. More than eight months after the closure of the criminal proceedings, the case remains largely under seal.A lawsuit has been filed by EWU Media LLC who has alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road.

Defendants Moscow/MPD have filed correspondence from the federal authorities concerning records provided in assisting in the investigation of the crimes at 1122 King Road and are asking to have the currently pending hearing (oral argument) set for May 18, 2026 to be rescheduled for the reasons set forth in the Defense's motion to continue. This is a current status of the case. 

Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. 

Everything here represents the host's pure opinions and commentary pursuant to Amend. I, U.S. Constitution (freedom of speech and the press) which is quoted to and discussed here.Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation reg 9

This is an update on the status of the public records lawsuit filed in Idaho state court concerning undisclosed Idaho4 investigatory records where we provide pure opinion, commentary and speculation pursuant to the First Amendment.

Idaho v. Kohberger was a high-profile, highly-sealed criminal case which proceeded in state court for over 2.5 years until July 2025 when Mr. Kohberger to the surprise of many agreed to plead guilty to all charges brought by a criminal indictment returned by an Idaho grand jury. Today, nearly a year after the closure of the criminal proceedings, the case remains largely under seal. A lawsuit was filed by EWU Media LLC alleging the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests in 2025. Where do matters stand right now? Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.