Kathy's InDieZoNe

Here, we provided opinions, commentary and speculation regarding the settlement of the federal lawsuit filed by Hollywood actress Blake Lively's lawsuit against her former co-star/director Justin Baldoni and certain film production, distribution and promotion companies associated with the Hollywood film "It Ends With Us." Trial was scheduled to commence on May 18, 2026. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#BlakeLively#JustinBaldoni#ItEndsWithUs

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment citing to official records regarding State of California v Britney Spears where entertainer Ms. Spears agreed to enter into a plea deal with the State regarding the one count DUI charge that was brought against her. Ms. Spears is considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless she (1) pleads guilty or (2) is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#BritneySpears

#DUI

#FreeSpeech

Here, we discuss and opine for criticism, commentary, news reporting and educational/research purposes the purpose of our independent reporting of the investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Rd. & the Idaho v Kohberger highly sealed criminal case that has been closed for nearly a year.  On May 15, 2025, the date of the final pre-trial conference, Judge Hippler issued three orders regarding a "leak" and potential violation of the court's non-dissemination order.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#FreeSpeech

#FirstAmendment

Here, we discuss and opine for criticism, commentary, news reporting and educational/research purposes the purpose of our independent reporting of the investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Rd. & the Idaho v Kohberger highly sealed criminal case that has been closed for nearly a year.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#FreeSpeech

#FirstAmendment

Here we address recent out-of-court developments in the (still) highly sealed and long-closed case of Idaho v Kohberger, asking the rhetorical question if Judge Megan E. Marshall might unseal materials from the Moscow Police Dept. files following a forthcoming hearing in EWU Media v. City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept.

LINK to Playlist discussed in this presentation: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbLUtgSDXdFPt8nqgkLpSBcZFxtS2cYep

LINK to Forthcoming Live Event discussed in this presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_VCvrZrnf4

Idaho v. Kohberger was a high-profile, highly-sealed criminal case which proceeded in state court for over 2.5 years until July 2025 when Mr. Kohberger to the surprise of many agreed to plead guilty to all charges brought by a criminal indictment returned by an Idaho grand jury. More than eight months after the closure of the criminal proceedings, the case remains largely under seal.A lawsuit has been filed by EWU Media LLC who has alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research) is not an infringement of copyright. 

#EWUvMoscow

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#JudgeMarshall

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard which resulted in a $10 million judgment in Scofield's favor. We also discuss and provide pure opinions concerning Guillard's current efforts to get that judgment against her thrown out of court at the appellate and district court levels. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#Idaho4

#Idaho4Defamation

#FreeSpeech

#ScofieldvGuillard

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment concerning the current status of State of Idaho v Stacy J. Wondra, dealing with the tragic Michael Vaughn case. We note that the defense filed a motion and the court seeking an enlargement of time to file pretrial motions prior to the forthcoming September 2026 jury trial, which the court granted.

Link to the Idaho cases of interest webpage where the State v. Wondra court records are published:⁠⁠https://coi.isc.idaho.gov⁠⁠

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#MichaelVaughn

#StatevWondra

#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the multiple-count federal lawsuit styled as Steve Goncalves et al. v. Washington State University which is proceeding in the United Stated district court for the Western District of Washington. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4⁠⁠ (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) . (⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) ) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#BryanKohberger⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) ) (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) .

Here, we discuss and opine for criticism, commentary, news reporting and educational/research purposes the purpose of our independent reporting of the investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Rd. & the Idaho v Kohberger highly sealed criminal case that has been closed for nearly a year.

Amend. I, U.S. Const. is quoted and cited to within this presentation which is comprised of pure opinion, commentary and speculation per the First Amendment. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright

#JudgeHippler

#IdahovKohberger

#BryanKohberger

#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment citing to official records maintained by the Ventura County Sheriff's Office concerning the April 30, 2026 DUI complaint filed against the celebrity/entertainer Britney Spears. We also discuss the scheduled hearing on May 4, 2026. LINK to our YT Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/postsMs. Spears is considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless she (1) pleads guilty or (2) is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#BritneySpearss

#CaliforniavSpears

#FreeSpeech