Kathy's InDieZoNe

Idaho v. Kohberger was a high-profile, highly-sealed criminal case which proceeded in state court for over 2.5 years until July 2025 when Mr. Kohberger to the surprise of many agreed to plead guilty to all charges brought by a criminal indictment returned by an Idaho grand jury. More than eight months after the closure of the criminal proceedings, the case remains largely under seal.A lawsuit has been filed by EWU Media LLC who has alleged the City of Moscow/Moscow Police Dept. wrongfully withheld information from the Kohberger investigation records after they filed public records requests into the crimes at 1122 King Road. A hearing is scheduled in May on EWU's petition. Here we discuss an amended order entered by Judge Megan E. Marshall concerning the case. This is a current status of the case. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. 

#EWUvMoscow

#BryanKohberger

#Idaho4

#FirstAmendment

Here we provide pure comments, opinions and speculations based on the First Amendment as to the "DelphI Appeal" as the appellate proceeding styled as Richard Allen vs. State of Indiana has been referred to. In doing so, we provide multiple developments in the proceedings that have recently occurred posing the rhetorical question: Will Mr. Allen's conviction and sentence be reversed outright and alternatively will he be provided a "Franks" hearing challenging the warrant affidavit:

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#RichardAllen #Delphi #DelphiAppeal First Amendment, US ConstitutionFourthAmendment, US Constitution Under the Constitution of the United States, all persons charged with a crime are considered not guilty until or unless they (1) plead guilty or are (2) adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

Here, we provided opinions, commentary and speculation regarding the appeal styled as Richard Allen v. State of Indiana discussing the status of the appeal. This is the high profile "Delphi case" where Appellant is seeking a new trial or in the alternative remanding to the trial court for a "Franks" hearing. According to the docket Mr. Allen has filed his Reply Brief and also filed a Motion for Oral Argument. We discuss here a crucial new notation on the court docket of April 29, 2026 and also the Reply Brief docketed one day earlier on April 28, 2026.

The Allen v. Indiana complete docket is available for the public's review free of charge here: https://public.courts.in.gov/mycase/#/vw/Search

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#AbbyandLibby

#DelphiAppeal

#AllenvIndiana

#RichardMAppeal

Here, we provide an update on the State of California vs. Nick Reiner case concerning Mr. Reiner's April 29, 2026 hearing. He has been charged with two counts of unalivings in the first degree with special circumstances concerning the tragic Dec. 14, 2025 unalivings of his parents, famed Hollywood director/actor Rob Reiner and photographer/producer Michelle Reiner. New developments occurred in the case this past week, discussed here. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Under the Constitution of the United States, all persons charged with a crime are considered not guilty until or unless they (1) plead guilty or are (2) adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

Here, we discuss and opine for criticism, commentary, news reporting and educational/research purposes the purpose of our independent reporting of the investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Rd. & the Idaho v Kohberger. A review of the docket and case summary page reveals no new orders, notices of hearings, or other similar evidence from Judge Steven J. Hippler in response to recent out-of-court events regarding the case. Amend. I, U.S. Const. is quoted and cited to within this presentation which is comprised of pure opinion, commentary and speculation per the First Amendment. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#JudgeHippler

#IdahovKohberger

Here, we discuss and opine for criticism, commentary, news reporting and educational/research purposes the purpose of our independent reporting of the investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Rd. & the Idaho v Kohberger.

Link to our YT channel: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/posts

Amend. I, U.S. Const. is quoted and cited to within this presentation which is comprised of pure opinion, commentary and speculation per the First Amendment. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#BryanKohberger

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning a current status regrind the high-profile federal civil case styled as Washington State University in the matter styled as Goncalves et al. v. WSU.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here, we discuss and opine for criticism, commentary, news reporting and educational/research purposes the purpose of our independent reporting of the investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Rd. & the Idaho v Kohberger case relative to recent out-of-court "fireworks" and two critical voices who have not yet been heard from. Amend. I, U.S. Const. is quoted and cited to within this presentation which is comprised of pure opinion, commentary and speculation per the First Amendment. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#BryanKohberger

#Idaho4

#FirstAmendment

Here, we provided opinions, commentary and speculation regarding the appeal styled as Richard Allen v. State of Indiana discussing the status of the appeal. This is the high profile "Delphi case" where Appellant is seeking a new trial or in the alternative remanding to the trial court for a "Franks" hearing. According to the docket Mr. Allen has filed his Reply Brief and also filed a Motion for Oral Argument. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#AllenvIndiana

#AbbyandLibby

#RichardAllen

Here, we provided opinions, commentary and speculation regarding the appeal styled as Richard Allen v. State of Indiana discussing the status of the briefings. This is the high profile "Delphi case" where Appellant is seeking a new trial or in the alternative remanding to the trial court for a "Franks" hearing.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#AbbyandLibby

#AllenvIndiana

#RichardAllen

#FreeSpeech