Kathy's InDieZoNe

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the lawsuit styled as Goncalves et al v. Washington State University, a civil action filed by the parents of the four students lost at 1122 King Road and related to the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger. On April 14, 2026 the federal court Judge Evanson issued a 9 page scheduling order. What's it's purpose? What does it say? Join us as we discuss it all.

LINK: To YT Community Page Discussed in this Presentation (Order appears April 14, 2026):

https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/postsEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the recent unreleased four (4) documents filed by the parties concerning the State's Motion Seeking an Order Amending the Order of Restitution and Request for a ruling without a hearing plus two other related documents weeks ago. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4

#IdahovKohberger

#RestitutionOrder

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard.

Here we discuss the appellate proceeding concerning the $10 million judgment entered against Ms. Guillard which has just opened in the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Link to YT Channel:

https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the appeal and scheduling order set by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals concerning the $10 million judgment entered against the defense in the District Court of Idaho in Scofield v. Guillard - the Idaho4 Defamation Case.

LINK to our YT channel:

https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/videos

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the civil defamation case styled as Macron v. Owens, where the President and First Lady of France have sued podcaster Candace Owens alleging the defendant defamed Ms. Macron by claiming she was born a man, "switched" identities with a male, and has engaged in other acts of defamation against her.

Here in providing pure opinions, commentary and speculation per the First Amendment which is cited to and quoted, we also note the Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss the Lawsuit. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#CandaceOwens

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and ask rhetorical questions pursuant to the First Amendment concerning th next anticipated events prior to the May 18, 2026 hearing before Judge Megan E. Marshall in the battle over information sought in public records from EWU Media the Petitioner in their lawsuit over records requested from the Kohberger files in their public records lawsuit against the City of Moscow and the Moscow Police Dept.

Link to our YT Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNeEverything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠ ⁠#IdahovKohberger⁠ ⁠#FirstAmendment⁠

Here we provide a look back, providing pure commentary, opinions and speculation regarding whether in light of some recent "behind the scenes" court filings if a possible Kohberger hearing in the works on the issue of amending restitution? LINK to our sister YT channel:

https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNeEverything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4 #IdahovKohberger #FirstAmendment

Here we provide an update, providing pure commentary, opinions and speculation regarding the current status of the federal lawsuit filed by the family members of the students who were tragically lost at 1122 King Road on November 13, 2022 styled as Steve Goncalves et al v. Washington State University.

Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠How this was made.

Here we provide an update, providing pure commentary, opinions and speculation regarding the defense in the Idaho4 defamation case styled as Scofield v. Guillard's recent filing in district court of three documents to set aside the final judgment entered against her on March 5, 2026. Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠How this was made

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment discussing the status of the docket and case summary page in the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger. A pure opinion and comment is proffered regarding one document of the 89 still sealed documents ordered to be released Dec. 18. 2025 that was released today. LINK TO Idaho Cases of Interest webpage where the Kohberger docket/case summary page may be viewed by the public:

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/Cases/CR01-24-31665-26.htmlEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#IdahovKohberger#Idaho4#FirstAmendment