
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the questions that continue to percolate as to why the highly sealed high-profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger, closed in July 2025, still remains sealed from public disclosure with sealed documents from January - March 2025 ordered to be released on December 18, 2025 not released and with no fourth order directed towards sealed 2024 documents rendered as of this date.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.
All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.
#Idaho4 #BryanKohberger
(https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger which led to the civil defamation action for money damages filed on December 21, 2022 known as Schofield v. Guillard which is set to go to trial in February 2026 in Boise, Idaho (federal court). We discuss the fact that according to the docket a key court-ordered deadline of January 30, 2026 appears to have been missed which raises a rhetorical question of what is the status of the four-day jury trial set to commence February 24, 2026.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.
#Idaho4
#Defamation
#FirstAmendment
#BryanKohberger
Here we provide pure comments, opinions and speculations based on the First Amendment as to the "DelphI Appeal" as the appellate proceeding styled as Richard Allen vs. State of Indiana has been referred to. We discuss that based on developments occurring in late January 2026, that the deadline for the State of Indiana as Appellee to respond to Appellant Allen's Initial Brief on the Merits has amended resulting in a new deadline of when said Response has been court-ordered to be filed.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #RichardAllen #Delphi #DelphiAppeal First Amendment, US ConstitutionFourthAmendment, US Constitution Under the Constitution of the United States, all persons charged with a crime are considered not guilty until or unless they (1) plead guilty or are (2) adjudicated guilty in a court of law.
Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the questions that continue to percolate as to why the highly sealed high-profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger, closed in July 2025, still remains sealed from public disclosure.
The same relates to documents under seal from Jan., Feb. and March 2025 including evidence. In doing so, the Court has reversed a decision to unseal specific documents contained in a December 18, 2025 order without providing details as to which documents will not be released - or why.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.
All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.
#Idaho4 #BryanKohberger
(https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning a development occurring Saturday January 31, 2026 appointing the Honorable Kimberly Evanson to serve as the trier of the law in the case. LINK to Court Order Described in this Podcast Episode:
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://agportal-s3bucket.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/Federal%20Litigation/269_OrdGrntgPlsMSJ_DenyDefsMSJ.pdf?VersionId=fVxuHF7wEjQn6UtGftJbdaZzHcbb_KwP
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. #Idaho4 #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho.... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan....
Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning a motion filed by the WA attorney general's office seeking to transfer venue of the federal Goncalves et al v. WSU lawsuit from the Western to the Eastern District of Washington closer to the WSU Pullman campus and to Moscow Idaho.
A hearing, the first in the lawsuit, has been set on this motion to transfer venue on February 27, 2026. What is expected to happen next?
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. #Idaho4 #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger which led to the civil defamation action for money damages filed on December 21, 2022 known as Schofield v. Guillard which is set to go to trial in February 2026 in Boise, Idaho (federal court). We discuss the fact that according to the docket a key court-ordered deadline of January 30, 2026 appears to have been missed which raises a rhetorical question of what is the status of the four-day jury trial set to commence February 24, 2026.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.
#Idaho4
#Defamation
#FirstAmendment
#BryanKohberger
Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning a motion filed by the WA attorney general's office seeking to transfer venue of the federal Goncalves et al v. WSU lawsuit from the Western to the Eastern District of Washington closer to the WSU Pullman campus and to Moscow Idaho. A hearing has been set on this motion to occur on February 26, 2026. We discuss pure opinions, comments and speculate over what the state has objected to in a "renewed manner" leading to successfully persuading the court to reverse its prior ruling of Dec. 18, 2025 by providing 3 examples of what State objected to being unsealed to the public regarding the Oct. 18, 2025 Third Court order to unseal. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. #Idaho4 #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger which led to the civil defamation action for money damages filed on December 21, 2022 known as Schofield v. Guillard which is set to go to trial in February 2026 in Boise, Idaho (federal court). We discuss the fact that the federal court judge has now entered a protective order granting a motion that has been pending since October 9, 2025 as this case speeds toward jury trial commencing February 24, 2026.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 #BryanKohberger #Idaho4Defamation
Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the lawsuit styled as Goncalves et al v. Washington State University, a civil action filed by the parents of the four students lost at 1122 King Road and related to the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger. On January 27, 2026, WSU represented by the Attorney General of the State of Washington has removed the lawsuit from state to federal court where the action is now proceeding. On January 29, 2026, the federal court entered the first order In the case which appears at docket entry no. 7.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 #BryanKohberger #WashingtonStateUniversity
From the publisher's feed

8,471 Listeners

504 Listeners