Kathy's InDieZoNe

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning a court order that was rendered on January 29, 2026 - the first filing on the docket in over 3 weeks - which grants the State's Motion to Reconsider Unsealing Documents per the 3rd Court Order to unseal issued October 16, 2025.

The same relates to documents under seal from Jan., Feb. and March 2025 including evidence. In doing so, the Court has reversed a decision to unseal specific documents contained in a December 18, 2025 order without providing details as to which documents will not be released - or why.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ #BryanKohberger

(⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4⁠⁠) (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho..⁠⁠. (⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...⁠⁠) ) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#BryanKohberger⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...⁠⁠) (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan..⁠⁠.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger which led to the civil defamation action for money damages filed on December 21, 2022 known as Schofield v. Guillard which is set to go to trial in February 2026 in Boise, Idaho (federal court). We discuss the entry of an order rendered by the federal court on the Plaintiff's Motion in Limine seeking to prevent the defense from proffering any evidence or argument as to the issue of liability on defamation which the defense did not respond to and has now been granted.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠#BryanKohberger⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4Defamation

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the lawsuit styled as Goncalves et al v. Washington State University, a civil action filed by the parents of the four students lost at 1122 King Road and related to the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger. Following the removal of the state case to federal court by WSU on January 27, 2026, the Plaintiffs filed three papers in the new federal court case seeking pro hac admission of member of Plaintiff's counsel's team in the federal action.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ #BryanKohberger #WashingtonStateUniversity

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the lawsuit styled as Goncalves et al v. Washington State University, a civil action filed by the parents of the four students lost at 1122 King Road and related to the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger. On January 27, 2026, WSU represented by the Attorney General of the State of Washington has removed the lawsuit from state to federal court where the action is now proceeding.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ #BryanKohberger #WashingtonStateUniversity

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger which led to the civil defamation action for money damages filed on December 21, 2022 known as Schofield v. Guillard which is set to go to trial in February 2026 in Boise, Idaho (federal court). We discuss the fact that crucial deadlines are rapidly approaching in advance of the forthcoming Feb. 24, 2026 four-day jury trial.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠#BryanKohberger⁠⁠ ⁠⁠#Idaho4Defamation

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the catastrophic events at 1122 King Road which led to the initiation of one of the most high-profile cases in recent years of Idaho v. Kiohberger a case which was highly sealed with gag orders and multiple behind-closed-doors hearings in the more than 2.5 years it was actively prosecuted until July 2025. At that time, it was announced Mr. Kohberger had accepted a plea deal agreeing to waive his appellate rights which cancelled the then-pending August 2025 jury trial and led to Mr. Kohberger's sentencing shortly thereafter on July 23, 2025 without any pre-sentencing activities for Mr. Kohberger who had been diagnosed with multiple medical conditions including autism 90 days before and where the trial court was required to determine if his guilty plea was "knowing" and "voluntary."

A SCOTUS case brought by a Texas man styled as Hunter v. United States wherein Mr. Hunter also waived his appellate rights in a plea deal that will be entertained by the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 2026 may change things for Mr. Kohberger and others who waive appellate rights when entering into plea deals with the government on due process grounds.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ #BryanKohberger

(⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4⁠⁠) (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho..⁠⁠. (⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...⁠⁠) ) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#BryanKohberger⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...⁠⁠) (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan..⁠⁠.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the 2025 civil defamation case styled as Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron v. Candace Owens et al., where the President and First Lady of France have sued popularpodcaster Ms. Owens alleging she defamed Ms. Macron by claiming she was born a man and both Mr. and Mrs. Macron in alleging they both committed fraud regarding the same. Here we provide an up-to-the minute status on the defense's motion seeking to have the case thrown out of court including a new defense filing docketed January 23, 2026.

A hearing has now been scheduled on the defense's Motion to Dismiss which if granted would throw the case out of court; if it is denied it would proceed towards jury trial.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#CandaceOwens

#FirstAmendment

#BrigitteMacron

#PresidentMacron

#Defamation

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger which led to the civil defamation action for money damages filed on December 21, 2022 known as Schofield v. Guillard which is set to go to trial in February 2026 in Boise, Idaho (federal court). We discuss the fact that Ms. Guillard secured a win on her motion to exclude the Plaintiff Scofield's two expert witness, in part.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠#BryanKohberger⁠ ⁠#Idaho4Defamation

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the catastrophic events at 1122 King Road which led to the initiation of one of the most high-profile cases in recent years of Idaho v. Kiohberger a case which was highly sealed with gag orders and multiple behind-closed-doors hearings in the more than 2.5 years it was actively prosecuted until July 2025. At that time, it was announced Mr. Kohberger had accepted a plea deal agreeing to waive his appellate rights which cancelled the then-pending August 2025 jury trial.

A SCOTUS case styled as Hunter v. United States where Mr. Hunter also waived his appellate rights in a plea deal that will be entertained by the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 2026 may change things for Mr. Kohberger and others who waive appellate rights when entering into plea deals with the government.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ #BryanKohberger

(⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4⁠⁠) (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho..⁠⁠. (⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...⁠⁠) ) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#BryanKohberger⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...⁠⁠) (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan..⁠⁠.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the 2025 civil defamation case styled as Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron v. Candace Owens et al., where the President and First Lady of France have sued popularpodcaster Ms. Owens alleging she defamed Ms. Macron by claiming she was born a man and both Mr. and Mrs. Macron in alleging they both committed fraud regarding the same. Here we provide an up-to-the minute status on the defense's motion seeking to have the case thrown out of court.

A hearing has now been scheduled on the defense's Motion to Dismiss which if granted would throw the case out of court; if it is denied it would proceed towards jury trial.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#CandaceOwens

#FirstAmendment

#BrigitteMacron

#PresidentMacron

#Defamation