
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In Episode 879, we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations and ask rhetorical questions in the form of an update that after more than a month, a public record that was dated November 25, 2025 was released to the public, represented the first time since November 13, 2025 that anything new was published on the docket in Idaho v. Kohberger.
We also note some new items noted on the Case Summary Page which was also updated today, the first time since November 26, 2025, to include a December 18, 2025 order (not yet appearing on the public record) regarding Judge Hippler's decision as to sealed documents from January-March 2025 and whether they will be released to the public, released with redactions or will still maintain their sealed status.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
In Episode 878, we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations and ask rhetorical questions in the form of an update into an Idaho Department of Investigations Official Investigation concerning possible "leaked" video of Mr. Kohberger purportedly inside the maximum security prison where he was sentenced to begin serving out his life term outside of Boise effective July 23, 2025. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
This Idaho v. Kohberger podcast began with a page-by-page review of the Dec. 29, 2022 "Affidavit of Probable Cause" or "Probable Cause Affidavit (PCA)" signed by Det. Brett Payne of the Moscow Police Department that led to the arrest of Bryan C. Kohberger one day later in Pennsylvania, effectively document no. 1 in the criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger. During this special series also consisting of 18 episodes, we look back at the PCA page-by-page with the benefit of retrospect and certain information and documents that were not available when we started this podcast. This is Part 18 focusing on Page 18 of the PCA
Here, we note what appears to be another error regarded the stated location of the home where the students were found just above Det. Payne's statement requesting the issuance of a warrant for Mr. Kohberger's arrest based on all that is stated within the PCA certifying it to be true and correct under penalty of perjury.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
This Idaho v. Kohberger podcast began with a page-by-page review of the Dec. 29, 2022 "Affidavit of Probable Cause" or "Probable Cause Affidavit (PCA)" signed by Det. Brett Payne of the Moscow Police Department that led to the arrest of Bryan C. Kohberger one day later in Pennsylvania, effectively document no. 1 in the criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger. During this special series also consisting of 18 episodes, we look back at the PCA page-by-page with the benefit of retrospect and certain information and documents that were not available when we started this podcast. This is Part 17 focusing on Page 17 of the PCA
Here, we note that as Det. Brett Payne who signed this PCA under oath requesting and successfully obtaining a warrant for Mr. Kohberger's arrest, describes the movements of a cellular phone after the timeline of the crimes as the "8548" phone. This is the second time he has referred to this cellular device as the "8548" phone and not the "8458" phone he previously stated was Mr. Kohberger's phone - begging the rhetorical question, is this a scriveners error or is the PCA describing two different cellular phones?
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
Here, we provide an update on the State of California vs. Nick Reiner case. On this date, December 17, 2025, Mr. Reiner made his first appearance in court and waived his right to a timely preliminary hearing. Mr. Reiner has been charged with two counts of unalivings with special circumstances concerning his father well-known director/actor Rob Reiner and his mother photographer/producer Michele Reiner at their family home in Brentwood, California.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.
Under the Constitution of the United States, all persons charged with a crime are considered not guilty until or unless they (1) plead guilty or are (2) adjudicated guilty in a court of law.
#RobReiner
#MicheleReiner
#NickReiner
#TrueCrime
This Idaho v. Kohberger podcast began with a page-by-page review of the Dec. 29, 2022 "Affidavit of Probable Cause" or "Probable Cause Affidavit (PCA)" signed by Det. Brett Payne of the Moscow Police Department that led to the arrest of Bryan C. Kohberger one day later in Pennsylvania, effectively document no. 1 in the criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger. During this special series also consisting of 18 episodes, we look back at the PCA page-by-page with the benefit of retrospect and certain information and documents that were not available when we started this podcast. This is Part 16 focusing on Page 16 of the PCAHere, we note the (at least) fourth documented error in the PCA as well as statements which appear to be presented as facts which are possibly based on speculation in this crucially important document regarding the matter of the unalivings of four young students at an off-campus rental property on November 13, 2022. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
This Idaho v. Kohberger podcast began with a page-by-page review of the Dec. 29, 2022 "Affidavit of Probable Cause" or "Probable Cause Affidavit (PCA)" signed by Det. Brett Payne of the Moscow Police Department that led to the arrest of Bryan C. Kohberger one day later in Pennsylvania, effectively document no. 1 in the criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger.
During this special series also consisting of 18 episodes, we look back at the PCA page-by-page with the benefit of retrospect and certain information and documents that were not available when we started this podcast. This is Part 15 focusing on Page 15 of the PCA
Here, Detective Payne states that towers providing coverage for Moscow, Idaho indicates that the "8458 Phone" was in Moscow on November 14, 2022 but that investigators felt it was not in Moscow that day without providing an explanation why along with other statements that raises the rhetorical question - was information contained on this page based on facts or speculation?
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
This Idaho v. Kohberger podcast began with a page-by-page review of the Dec. 29, 2022 "Affidavit of Probable Cause" or "Probable Cause Affidavit (PCA)" signed by Det. Brett Payne of the Moscow Police Department that led to the arrest of Bryan C. Kohberger one day later in Pennsylvania, effectively document no. 1 in the criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger.
During this special series also consisting of 18 episodes, we look back at the PCA page-by-page with the benefit of retrospect and certain information and documents that were not available when we started this podcast. This is Part 14 focusing on Page 14 of the PCA
Here, Detective Payne describes actions undertaken by Law Enforcement to attempt to track Mr. Kohberger's whereabouts through the movement of his cellular phone, referred to as the "8458" phone in the PCA, from November 12, 2022 through November 13, 2022. According to the PCA, the catastrophic events at 1122 King Road occurred from 4:00 am through 4:25 am on November 13, 2022. At one point, however, it is asserted Mr. Kohberger traveled through "Uniontown, Idaho" which does not exist.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
This Idaho v. Kohberger podcast began with a page-by-page review of the Dec. 29, 2022 "Affidavit of Probable Cause" or "Probable Cause Affidavit (PCA)" signed by Det. Brett Payne of the Moscow Police Department that led to the arrest of Bryan C. Kohberger one day later in Pennsylvania, effectively document no. 1 in the criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger.
During this special series also consisting of 18 episodes we look back at the PCA page-by-page with the benefit of retrospect and certain information and documents that were not available when we started this podcast. This is Part 13 focusing on Page 13 of the PCA
Here, Detective Payne describes actions undertaken by Law Enforcement to attempt to track Mr. Kohberger's whereabouts through the movement of his cellular phone, referred to as the "8458" phone in the PCA, from November 12, 2022 through November 13, 2022. According to the PCA, the catastrophic events at 1122 King Road occurred from 4:00 am through 4:25 am on November 13, 2022.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
Here, we provide an update on the State of California vs. Nick Reiner case. Amongst other matters, it has been learned that an 8:30 am hearing has been scheduled for this date December 17, 2025 in this high profile case where Mr. Reiner has been charged with two counts of unalivings with special circumstances concerning his father well-known director/actor Rob Reiner and his mother photographer/producer Michele Reiner at their family home in Brentwood, California.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.
Under the Constitution of the United States, all persons charged with a crime are considered not guilty until or unless they (1) plead guilty or are (2) adjudicated guilty in a court of law.
#RobReiner
#MicheleReiner
#NickReiner
#TrueCrime
From the publisher's feed

8,471 Listeners

504 Listeners