
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Here, we provide a members-only exclusive updates on the State of California vs. Nick Reiner case where high-profile California defense attorney Alan Jackson who was part of the team that successfully convinced a jury in the high-profile Karen Reed case to return not guilty verdicts has announced he is representing Mr. Reiner. This proceeding involves another high-profile case, in the criminal case involving the unalivings of Mr. Reinter's parents - filmmaker/actor Rob Reiner and his photograph wife Michele Reiner inside their Brentwood home in California on Sunday, December 14, 2025. Mr. Reiner has in the Los Angeles County jail in connection with these crimes since Sunday evening, December 14, 2025.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.
Under the Constitution of the United States, all persons charged with a crime are considered not guilty until or unless they (1) plead guilty or are (2) adjudicated guilty in a court of law.
#RobReiner
#MicheleReiner
#NickReiner
#TrueCrime
Here, we provide an update on the State of California vs. Nick Reiner case where it has been learned high-profile California defense attorney Alan Jackson who was part of the team that successfully convinced a jury in the high-profile Karen Reed case to return not guilty verdicts has announced he is representing Mr. Reiner in the criminal case involving the unalivings of his parents - filmmaker/actor Rob Reiner and his photograph wife Michele Reiner inside their Brentwood home in California on Sunday, December 14, 2025. Their Nick Reiner has in the Los Angeles County jail in connection with these crimes since Sunday evening, December 14, 2025.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.
Under the Constitution of the United States, all persons charged with a crime are considered not guilty until or unless they (1) plead guilty or are (2) adjudicated guilty in a court of law.
#RobReiner
#MicheleReiner
#NickReiner
#TrueCrime
In Episode 877, we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations and ask rhetorical questions in the form of updates regarding a (still) unreleased public record filed by the State of Idaho back on November 25, 2025 and a (still) unruled-upon Oct. 16, 2025 order concerning the possible unsealing of documents under seal from January, February and March 2025 in the high profile (closed) criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
This Idaho v. Kohberger podcast began with a page-by-page review of the Dec. 29, 2022 "Affidavit of Probable Cause" or "Probable Cause Affidavit (PCA)" signed by Det. Brett Payne of the Moscow Police Department that led to the arrest of Bryan C. Kohberger one day later in Pennsylvania, effectively document no. 1 in the criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger.
During this special series also consisting of 18 episodes we look back at the PCA page-by-page with the benefit of retrospect and certain information and documents that were not available when we started this podcast. This is Part 12 discussing Page 12 of the PCA.
Here, Detective Payne describes efforts to track Mr. Kohberger's whereabouts at the time of the catastrophic events at 1122 King Road via the movements of his cellular phone, referenced as the 8458 cellular phone.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
Here, we announce a new case we will be covering following the tragic unalivings of filmmaker/actor Rob Reiner and his photograph wife Michele Reiner inside their Brentwood home in California on Sunday, December 14, 2025. Their son has been taken into custody and booked in the Los Angeles County jail in connection with these crimes. ,
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.
Under the Constitution of the United States, all persons charged with a crime are considered not guilty until or unless they (1) plead guilty or are (2) adjudicated guilty in a court of law.
#RobReiner
#MicheleReiner
#NickReiner
#TrueCrime
In Episode 5, we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning the rescheduling of the preliminary hearing previously scheduled to occur on Dec. 15-16, 2025 to determine if the State has enough evidence for probable cause to continue incarcerating Defendant through trial to March 2026. We discuss the reasons why based on published court minutes from a Dec. 11, 2025 Case Management Conference. The court docket is located on the Idaho Cases of Judicial Interest website alongside the Idaho v. Kohberger case for access to all the filings.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
This Idaho v. Kohberger podcast began with a page-by-page review of the Dec. 29, 2022 "Affidavit of Probable Cause" or "Probable Cause Affidavit (PCA)" signed by Det. Brett Payne of the Moscow Police Department that led to the arrest of Bryan C. Kohberger one day later in Pennsylvania, effectively document no. 1 in the criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger.
During this special series also consisting of 18 episodes we look back at the PCA page-by-page with the benefit of retrospect and certain information and documents that were not available when we started this podcast. This is Part 11 focusing on Page 11 of the PCA
Here, Detective Payne describes Mr. Kohberger's travels across the country through various states through his arrival in Pennsylvania in mid-December 2022 where he will, approximately two weeks later, be arrested following the issuance of a warrant for his arrest for the catastrophic events at 1122 King Road based on the strength of the 18 page Affidavit of Probable Cause. .
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
This Idaho v. Kohberger podcast began with a page-by-page review of the Dec. 29, 2022 "Affidavit of Probable Cause" or "Probable Cause Affidavit (PCA)" signed by Det. Brett Payne of the Moscow Police Department that led to the arrest of Bryan C. Kohberger one day later in Pennsylvania, effectively document no. 1 in the criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger.
During this special series also consisting of 18 episodes we look back at the PCA page-by-page with the benefit of retrospect and certain information and documents that were not available when we started this podcast. This is Part 10 focusing on Page 10 of the PCA
Here, Detective Payne describes two traffic stops of Mr. Kohberger, one occurring in Moscow and the second at Washington State University. In doing so, Det. Payne appears to make an identification of the intruder DM advised two of Det. Payne's colleague's interviews of November 13, 2022 she saw rather than having the witness make this identification. Also on this page, Det. Payne discusses Mr. Kohberger's cell phone known as the "8458 phone" which will play an important role in Det. Payne's successful request for a warrant.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
This Idaho v. Kohberger podcast began with a page-by-page review of the Dec. 29, 2022 "Affidavit of Probable Cause" or "Probable Cause Affidavit (PCA)" signed by Det. Brett Payne of the Moscow Police Department that led to the arrest of Bryan C. Kohberger one day later in Pennsylvania, effectively document no. 1 in the criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger.
During this special series also consisting of 18 episodes we look back at the PCA page-by-page with the benefit of retrospect and certain information and documents that were not available when we started this podcast. This is Episode 9 focusing on Page 9 of the PCA.
Here Detective Payne continues to describe the travels of Suspect Vehicle 1 through Pullman as he asserts this is one vehicle captured on various cameras in the area. He also describes the fact that two (2) separate Washington State University law enforcement officers located Mr. Kohberger's car and reported it to the MPD following the issuance of a "Be on the Lookout" disseminated by the MPD to law enforcement officials. Additionally, we note that Mr. Kohberger's name is identified within the PCA for the first time on this page.
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
This Idaho v. Kohberger podcast began with a page-by-page review of the Dec. 29, 2022 "Affidavit of Probable Cause" or "Probable Cause Affidavit (PCA)" signed by Det. Brett Payne of the Moscow Police Department that led to the arrest of Bryan C. Kohberger one day later in Pennsylvania, effectively document no. 1 in the criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger.
During this special series also consisting of 18 episodes we look back at the PCA page-by-page with the benefit of retrospect and certain information and documents that were not available when we started this podcast. This is Episode 8 focusing on Page 8 of the PCA.
Here Detective Payne continues to describe the travels of Suspect Vehicle 1 from Moscow through Pullman as he asserts this is one vehicle captured on various cameras in the area. Now, with the benefit of these images unavailable to the public when the PCA was originally released, some in the community have asserted the PCA is actually describing more than one vehicle .
Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. #Idaho4 (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho4) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho... (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/idaho...) ) #BryanKohberger (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...) (https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/bryan...
From the publisher's feed

8,471 Listeners

504 Listeners