In Episode 410, we note that the deadlines for the parties to simultaneously file their respective motions in liming is quickly approaching. A pure opinion based on speculation considers whether Defense could move for Det. Mowery to be stricken as State's proposed expert witness with the State of Idaho moving to have Defense's expert witness Mr. Ray stricken "in limine" to prevent the future jury from hearing from them at the "Idaho4" trial currently set to commence Summer 2025.

The citation for the Idaho Supreme Court case discussed here addressing motions in limine is State of Idaho v. Ruben Daniel Diaz, Docket No. 47667 (Idaho April 6, 2022)

Everything stated here represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

In Episode 409, we address the fact that the State of Idaho on Feb. 4. 2025 filed a I.R.E. 404(b) Notice giving their intention to use video evidence of Mr. Kohberger's traffic stop and citation occurring on Aug. 22, 2022 in Moscow. The State indicates that this evidence will be introduced to prove Mr. Kohberger's (1) Identity (2) vehicle (3) address and (4) phone number.

Everything stated here represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

In Episode 408, we address the Jan. 31,. 2025 order rendered by Judge Steven Hippler vacating an order entered by him two weeks earlier sealing a stipulated motion to seal documents produced from the defense to the state addressed in Episode 408. Here, the court explains why he directed the Clerk of Court to unseal the stipulated motion and order on that stipulated motion providing the public with information not previously disclosed to the public.

Everything stated here represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

In Episode 407, we address the Jan. 10, 2025 Stipulation for a protective order between Ms. Taylor and Ms. Jennings which was unsealed by Judge Hippler on Jan. 31, 2025.

Everything stated here represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

In Episode 406, we note that the defense has now served its 22nd supplemental discovery request (seeking evidence) from the State of Idaho with the specific requests filed - once again -within a sealed exhibit. We also discuss the differences between a supplemental discovery request vs. a motion to compel discovery.

Everything stated here represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

In Episode 405, we discuss the Jan. 29, 2025 Stipulation between Attorneys Taylor and Jennings for the Defense & State, respectively, indicating the list of evidence each side brought before Judge Hippler at the Jan. 23-24 hearings on the crucial Defense Motions to Suppress/For a Franks Hearing. We are provided with important clues of what evidence the defense has stressed to Judge Hippler in seeking the granting of a Franks hearing and multiple suppression motions and the evidence pinpointed to by the State in opposing all motions.

The public is also provided information here never-before disclosed of such matters as the dates of law enforcement interviews with the surviving roommate who was referenced and quoted in the Affidavit of Probable Cause leading to Mr. Kohberger's arrest in this case where so much has been sealed from the public.

Everything stated here represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

In Episode 404, we note a Notice of Filing by the parties dated Jan. 29, 2025 which did not appear on the docket until late in the date of Jan. 31, 2025 reflecting the fact that the parties have stipulated to certain exhibits from the Defense Motions to Suppress and Franks Hearing. We explain why parties stipulate to exhibits for hearings and trials.

Everything stated here represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

In Episode 403, we note that Judge Hippler on Jan. 31, 2025 entered an "Amended Order" correcting a scrivener's a/k/a typographical order rendered in the Jan. 30, 2025 Court Order extending deadlines for crucial Motions in Limine.

We reported in Episode 401 what appeared to be a confusing directive in that the Court set deadlines for Responses and Replies to Motions in Limine to be due on the same date.

In Episode 402, we address two orders rendered by Judge Hippler on Jan. 29, 2025 sealing further discovery from the public in this proceeding. As noted, one order was based on the Defense's motion and the other based on the State's motion.

Everything stated here represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

To review the documents from the Court's file, please go here: https:0//coi.isc.idaho.gov

To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/commonwealth-v-kohberger-682-md-2022

In Episode 401, we note that Judge Hippler entered an order on the parties stipulation to change the Oct. 9, 2024 pre-trial/trial order concerning deadlines regarding the schedule for the filing of crucial Motions in Limine as well as their respective Responses and Replies thereto. (Note: Episode 400 of the IndieZoNe Podcast addressed the changes the parties requested and the reasons for these changes).

We opine our confusion as to this new schedule requiring the parties' Responses and Replies to now be due on the same day. We also note the Court has as we thought changed the hearing dates on the Motions in Limine.

Everything stated here represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

To review the documents from the Court's file, please go here: https:0//coi.isc.idaho.gov

To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/commonwealth-v-kohberger-682-md-2022