In Episode 400, we review the parties Jan. 28, 2025 Stipulated Motion to Extend deadline to File Motions in Limine which are set by the Court's Pre-Trial/Trial Order of Oct. 9, 2025. We note here the State/Defense seek to extend deadlines for the filing of both sides Motions in Limine and Responses in Opposition thereto by 2 weeks. Reasons provided as good cause include more time is needed to evaluate recent recent expert witness disclosures and that the defense requires additional time to review discovery - providing possible hints as to what these Motions in Limine might be focused on.

Everything stated here represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

To review the documents from the Court's file, please go here: https:0//coi.isc.idaho.gov

To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/commonwealth-v-kohberger-682-md-2022

In Episode 399, we address 3 filings - all dated Jan. 28, 2025 - that appear on the Case Summary Page in Idaho v. Kohberger. Three of these documents are public regards (a Stipulation to move the deadline for Motions in Limine set by Judge Hippler's Oct. 9, 2024 pre-trial/trial order and regarding newly-filed evidence). The sole sealed document is the newly-filed evidence submitted by Defense.

Everything stated here represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

To review the documents from the Court's file, please go here: https:0//coi.isc.idaho.gov

To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/commonwealth-v-kohberger-682-md-2022

In Episode 398, we discuss filings noted on the Idaho v Kohberger Case Summary Page by the Clerk regarding the State's Expert Penalty Phase Disclosures filed Jan. 27, 2025. One of these filings is a stipulated motion to seal exhibits concerning State's proposed witnesses. We address the fact that there are two separate phases of a criminal proceeding. The penalty phase is only applicable if a jury returns a verdict during the State's case in chief.

Everything stated here and in this podcast special series on the State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger case represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law. To review the documents from the Court's file, please go here: https:0//coi.isc.idaho.gov

To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/commonwealth-v-kohberger-682-md-2022

In Episode 397, we discuss the Jan. 27, 2025 where Judge Steven Hippler ordered the transcript from the closed hearing on Jan. 23, 2025 on Defense's Motion to Suppress IGG/DNA and for Franks Hearing will be released to the public after:

a) The parties (State and Defense) review the transcript

from hearing;

b) Identify which portions of the transcript should be redacted

c) Provide specific grounds why this information should not be released to the public

and return this information to the court within 14 days after each side received the transcripts from hearing from the court reporter who will transcript the closed hearing per Judge Hippler "verbatim." Thereafter it will be released.

Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law. To review the documents from the Court's file, please go here: https:0//coi.isc.idaho.gov

To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/commonwealth-v-kohberger-682-md-2022

In Episode 396, we discuss a Jan. 23, 2025 Stipulated Motion to Seal Exhibits to Defendant's Supplemental Response to Request for Discovery Regarding Expert Witnesses. Here the parties by and through Ms. Taylor and Ms. Jennings, counsel for Mr. Kohberger and the State of Idaho respectively, seek an order sealing the Defendant's exhibits to this supplemental response to State's discovery requests regarding the Defendant's proposed expert trial witnesses.

Everything stated here and in this podcast special series on the State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger case represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law. To review the documents from the Court's file, please go here: https:0//coi.isc.idaho.gov

To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/commonwealth-v-kohberger-682-md-2022

In Episode 395, we address a stipulation hand-signed by Attorneys Jennings and Taylor regarding (redacted) state expert witness(es) to authorize said out-of-state expert witness(es) to testify via Zoom at the January 23, 2025 Motion to Suppress/Franks Motion hearings.

We note that it took nine (9) days for this document to be docketed by the Clerk of Court's office as it was on January 24, 2025, that it has witness name(s) redacted, and that it is unclear if this is for sealed expert witness name or names.

Everything stated here and in this podcast special series on the State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger case represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law. To review the documents from the Court's file, please go here: https:0//coi.isc.idaho.gov

To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/commonwealth-v-kohberger-682-md-2022

In Episode 394, we discuss the Jan. 24, 2025 order sealing even further documents in this case: Order sealing exhibits to Defendant's Supplemental Response to Request for Discovery Regarding Expert Witnesses.

We note that this stipulation (agreement between the parties this material is properly sealed) follows a tradition established in the early days of this proceeding when the parties stipulated to a Non-Dissemination Order as they did on Jan. 3, 2023. This stipulation led to the entry of the "gag order" that same day.

Everything stated here and in this podcast special series on the State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger case represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law. To review the documents from the Court's file, please go here: https:0//coi.isc.idaho.gov

To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/commonwealth-v-kohberger-682-md-2022

In Episode 393, we address the Media Coalition's "Renewed Motion" to be heard by Judge Hippler as Interested Parties and a Notice of Hearing, both of which were docketed Jan. 22, 2025 per the Case Summary Page. This document which is available for public viewing is maintained by the Clerk of Court of Ada County and notes in chronological order key events in the case and provides details regarding which documents filed in the Idaho4 case are under seal vs. which are public documents.

Everything stated here and in this podcast special series on the State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger case represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law. To review the documents from the Court's file, please go here: https:0//coi.isc.idaho.gov

To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/commonwealth-v-kohberger-682-md-2022

In Episode 392, we discuss Judge Hippler's ruling of Jan 22, 2025 entitled "Order regarding presentation of IGG evidence" as it relates to evidence which will be undertaken during a closed hearing on Jan. 23, 2025.

The court clarifies that while he has authorized the taking of witness testimony in support of Mr. Kohberger's pending Motion to Suppress IGG (Evidence) and Motion for a Franks hearing (attacking warrant affidavit(s)) that this is not to be taken as the court's finding Defense satisfied the high burden required for a hearing per Franks v. Delaware.

Everything stated here and in this podcast special series on the State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger case represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law. To review the documents from the Court's file, please go here: https://coi.isc.idaho.gov

To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/commonwealth-v-kohberger-682-md-2022

In Episode 391, we discuss Judge Hippler's order denying the defense's Motion to Unseal IGG briefing and the hearing on the motion to suppress IGG evidence which is currently scheduled to be entertained by the Court along with Defense's 12 other suppression motions on Jan. 23-24, 2025.

Here Judge Hippler states that the matter of ensuring the jury pool is not tainted with evidence that might not be admissible in the case requires that matters concerning IGG remain under seal until the end of trial "at the latest" requiring denial of the defense motion to unseal.

Everything stated here and in this podcast special series on the State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger case represents the creator's pure opinions based on the court filings and proffered pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Freedom of Speech and of the Press) and is offered for educational purposes only.

Mr. Kohberger is presumed innocent of these crimes until or unless he pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law. To review the documents from the Court's file, please go here: https://coi.isc.idaho.gov

To review documents from the matter styled as Commonwealth of PA v. Kohberger, go here: https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/commonwealth-v-kohberger-682-md-2022