In this episode, Ben Parker and Madeline Jesson dive deep into the realities of law school, LSAT preparation, and how the two intersect. Madeline, now a 1L on a full scholarship, shares her first impressions of law school workload, time management, and how her LSAT skills have translated into her studies. Ben and Madeline explore whether certain reasoning abilities are truly teachable, or if some people simply “have it or don’t” when it comes to logic and comprehension.

They also connect LSAT logic to legal doctrines, especially how conditions, intent, and legal elements appear in torts and criminal law. Madeline explains how law professors rarely frame concepts as “sufficient” or “necessary conditions,” but LSAT training helps her interpret the language more clearly. The two discuss the broader debate over LSAT question types, shortcuts, and heuristics, concluding that true success comes down to strong reading and reasoning rather than over-categorization.

From there, the conversation shifts toward the financial side of law school. Ben and Madeline tackle the controversial new federal loan changes — what they mean for lower-tier law schools, student debt, and the predatory cycle of borrowing. They argue that studying for the LSAT is the highest ROI investment a student can make, often worth thousands of dollars per hour in scholarship value, compared to the crushing mathematics of student loans.

Finally, they answer a listener’s question about retaking the LSAT after a disappointing test day performance, emphasizing strategy, timing, and the importance of applying early in the law school cycle. Madeline shares her own admissions experience, including acceptances to UVA and Georgetown, and reflects on how applying early helped her gain opportunities that might not have been possible later in the cycle. Together, they reinforce that a high LSAT score and early, strategic applications remain the most powerful tools for future law students.

Explore all our LSAT resources here: linktr.ee/heyfuturelawyer