After a brief recess for Memorial Day, the trial resumed on Tuesday, May 27, 2025. The day was marked by the testimony of Capricorn Clark, a former assistant and brand director for Combs. Clark recounted a harrowing experience where she was allegedly kidnapped by Combs over missing jewelry. She also testified about witnessing Combs assault his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, and threatening to kill rapper Kid Cudi. These testimonies aimed to establish a pattern of abusive and violent behavior by Combs.

Additionally, law enforcement officials presented evidence linking Combs to a 2012 firebombing incident involving Kid Cudi's Porsche. Investigators detailed how a Molotov cocktail was used in the attack, with photos showing significant damage to the vehicle. This evidence was introduced to support allegations of Combs' involvement in acts of intimidation and retaliation.



On Wednesday, May 28, 2025, the federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs resumed with pivotal testimony from Deonte Nash, a former stylist and close associate of Cassie Ventura. Nash recounted a harrowing incident where he alleged witnessing Combs violently assault Ventura in her apartment. According to Nash, Combs pulled Ventura by her hair, struck her multiple times, and continued the attack until her head hit the edge of a bed frame, resulting in visible bleeding. Nash testified that when he attempted to call 911, Combs intervened, instructing that Ventura be taken to a plastic surgeon instead. He also described another episode where Combs allegedly threatened to release explicit videos of Ventura, stating he would distribute them to her family and the public if she defied him. These accounts aimed to underscore a pattern of control and intimidation central to the prosecution's case.

Earlier in the day, the court heard from Lance Jimenez, a Los Angeles firefighter and arson investigator, who testified about the 2012 firebombing of Kid Cudi's Porsche. Jimenez detailed the use of a Molotov cocktail in the attack and noted that, despite partial DNA evidence, the perpetrator remained unidentified. The defense challenged the relevance of this testimony, arguing it was speculative. However, the prosecution presented it to establish a narrative of retaliatory violence linked to Combs. The day's proceedings concluded with the defense initiating cross-examination of Nash, which was scheduled to continue the following day.


to contact me:


[email protected]