This Friday, May 9, 2025, at 9 p.m. ET/8 p.m. CT, Dateline NBC will air a two-hour special titled “The Terrible Night on King Road”, offering exclusive new insights into the investigation of the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The episode will feature never-before-seen evidence, including video, photographic, and digital materials that investigators say track the movements of the accused, Bryan Kohberger. Additionally, the special will include interviews with friends of the victims and in-depth analysis from criminology and genetics experts. A preview of the special is set to air on TODAY on Thursday, May 8


Correspondent Keith Morrison will also present interviews with former students who interacted with Kohberger. One such interview includes a former graduate student named Holly, who recounts meeting Kohberger at a pool party and receiving a text from him the next day with "peculiar" wording. The special aims to provide a comprehensive look into the case as Kohberger's trial approaches. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges. Dateline NBC has been covering this case extensively, and this upcoming episode promises to shed new light on the events leading up to the trial.


to  contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Video shows car resembling Bryan Kohberger’s around time of Idaho student murders

On Day 12 of Karen Read’s murder retrial, Massachusetts State Police Sgt. Yuriy Bukhenik, the supervising investigator in the case, took the stand. He recounted arriving at Canton police headquarters approximately three hours after John O’Keefe’s body was discovered, where he and former Trooper Michael Proctor were shown evidence collected at the scene, including a broken cocktail glass, O’Keefe’s cellphone, and blood samples stored in Solo cups within a Stop & Shop bag. Bukhenik testified that upon learning O’Keefe was missing a shoe, he theorized that O’Keefe had been struck by a vehicle, a hypothesis he later demonstrated to the jury by presenting the missing shoe and the shirt O’Keefe was wearing at the time of his death


During cross-examination, defense attorney Alan Jackson scrutinized Bukhenik’s oversight of the investigation, particularly focusing on his supervision of Proctor, who was later dismissed for sending inappropriate texts about Read. Jackson questioned Bukhenik about potential conflicts of interest, including the involvement of Canton Police Chief Ken Berkowitz, who had recused his department from the investigation due to familial ties to individuals connected to the case. Bukhenik defended the integrity of the investigation, asserting that it was conducted professionally and without bias, despite acknowledging that all individuals possess inherent biases


to contact me:


[email protected]



source:

Key investigator in Karen Read case questioned about cocktail glass theory | Fox News

In a letter addressed to Judge Arun Subramanian, attorneys for Sean "Diddy" Combs responded to the government's renewed effort to block the defense from introducing evidence or testimony about consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals who are not identified as victims in the case. The government had filed a motion in limine on April 28, 2025, seeking to exclude this category of evidence, arguing it was irrelevant and potentially prejudicial. However, Combs' legal team contends that the government's latest filing offers no new legal grounds or substantive arguments that weren’t already addressed in earlier briefs and hearings.

The defense urged the court to uphold its prior decision, made during a hearing on April 25, in which the judge acknowledged the defense had presented a valid legal foundation for introducing such evidence. Citing the transcript of that hearing, where the court stated the defense "has articulated a basis for the admission of this evidence," the letter reinforces the argument that these consensual encounters may be relevant to establish context, rebut specific claims, or support the credibility of the defense's narrative. Accordingly, Combs' attorneys asked the court to deny the government’s renewed motion and allow the previously approved evidence to be presented at trial.


In a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian, federal prosecutors responded to Sean Combs' April 28, 2025, claim that introducing racketeering acts at trial which were not specifically presented to the grand jury would violate his Fifth Amendment right to be indicted by a grand jury. Combs' defense argued that attempting to try him on unindicted acts would amount to an unconstitutional expansion of the charges, undermining the foundational requirement that federal felony charges originate from a grand jury indictment.

The government firmly rejected this argument, stating that there has been no constitutional violation and that Combs' claim lacks legal merit. Prosecutors maintain that the defendant is being tried on charges properly returned by a grand jury, and that additional racketeering acts, even if not individually enumerated in the indictment, can still be introduced at trial as part of the overarching RICO conspiracy. They urged the court to dismiss the defense’s position and allow the trial to proceed without limiting the scope of evidence supporting the racketeering charges.



to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.310.0.pdf

gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.306.0.pdf

Sean "Diddy" Combs has assembled a formidable legal team to defend him against federal charges of sex trafficking, racketeering, and related offenses. Leading the defense is Marc Agnifilo, a seasoned attorney known for representing high-profile clients such as NXIVM leader Keith Raniere and "Pharma Bro" Martin Shkreli. Joining him is Teny Geragos, daughter of renowned defense lawyer Mark Geragos, bringing experience from complex federal cases. Brian Steel, recognized for his defense of rapper Young Thug in a lengthy racketeering trial, adds his expertise to the team. Xavier Donaldson, a respected New York-based attorney with a strong background in criminal defense, also plays a key role. Additionally, Alexandra Shapiro, known for her appellate work, contributes her skills to the defense strategy. The team is further supported by jury consultant Linda Moreno, who assists in selecting an impartial jury.


This high-powered legal team reflects the seriousness of the charges Combs faces and his commitment to mounting a robust defense. Legal experts estimate that Combs may spend over $10 million on his defense, considering the caliber of attorneys involved and the complexity of the case. Each lawyer brings a unique set of skills and experience, aiming to challenge the prosecution's narrative and protect Combs' interests throughout the trial. The defense is expected to scrutinize the credibility of witnesses and question the interpretation of evidence, including surveillance footage and testimonies from alleged victims. As the trial unfolds, this legal team will be instrumental in navigating the intricate legal landscape and advocating on behalf of Combs.



to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Sean 'Diddy' Combs legal team: Here are the lawyers defending hip-hop mogul - ABC News

Sean “Diddy” Combs is facing near-certain conviction in his federal criminal trial, where he's charged with a sweeping racketeering conspiracy that includes arson, kidnapping, drug trafficking, and multiple sex-trafficking offenses. The case is being prosecuted by the Southern District of New York, and the evidence is stacked heavily against him—featuring surveillance footage of a brutal assault and testimony from four women who allege years of sexual abuse and coercion. Given the strength of the case and the fact that over 80 percent of federal prosecutions result in guilty verdicts, the odds are decisively not in Combs’ favor.


His defense, despite being backed by elite attorneys, has little room to maneuver. The phrase “baby-oil defense” is used to underscore the perceived absurdity of any attempt to explain away the damning evidence—particularly claims that recorded acts of violence were somehow consensual or misunderstood. The courtroom strategy will likely try to blur intent or context, but with such severe allegations and extensive corroboration, that approach is unlikely to resonate with a jury. The prosecution appears well-prepared to dismantle any narrative of innocence Combs tries to offer.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Diddy’s Baby-Oil Defense

On the fourth day of jury selection for Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, the process focused on narrowing down the remaining pool of 45 prospective jurors. Judge Arun Subramanian, along with prosecutors and defense attorneys, conducted in-depth interviews to assess potential biases, particularly concerning jurors' exposure to a 2016 video showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Several candidates were dismissed due to their familiarity with the footage or personal experiences with sexual assault, which could affect their impartiality. The defense and prosecution utilized their peremptory strikes—ten for the defense and six for the prosecution—to finalize a panel of 12 jurors and six alternates. The selection process concluded on Friday, May 9, setting the stage for opening statements scheduled for Monday, May 12

Throughout the selection process, the court encountered a mix of serious and unexpected moments. Some prospective jurors shared personal traumas, including experiences with sexual assault, leading to their dismissal. Conversely, lighter moments emerged, such as a juror admitting to stealing a Harry Potter wand during their youth and another confessing to falling asleep while binge-watching a television series. Judge Subramanian even joked about the extensive list of names involved in the case, comparing it to a Tolkien novel. These instances highlighted the challenges of assembling an impartial jury for a high-profile case involving a celebrity defendant.



to contact me:

[email protected]



source:


Diddy trial delayed as judge makes shock ruling on witnesses | Daily Mail Online

In Document 308, both parties in the United States v. Combs trial submitted a joint letter to Judge Arun Subramanian addressing the voir dire process, following their earlier filings (ECF Nos. 272 and 274) containing proposed questions for prospective jurors. The letter outlines areas of agreement between the prosecution and defense concerning how potential jurors should be questioned during selection. This includes standard demographic questions, prior jury service, general attitudes toward law enforcement and the justice system, and the ability to remain impartial in a high-profile case involving serious allegations. Both parties also agree on using written juror questionnaires before oral voir dire and ensuring the anonymity of jurors throughout the proceedings.


However, the letter also details several points of dispute between the parties regarding specific voir dire questions. These disagreements primarily center around how directly jurors should be asked about their knowledge of Combs’ past media controversies, opinions about the #MeToo movement, and whether jurors should be specifically questioned about their views on celebrity privilege or racial bias. The defense appears to want more targeted, probing questions to detect potential prosecutorial bias, while the government pushes back on what it sees as overly leading or prejudicial language. The letter asks Judge Subramanian to resolve these disputes before voir dire begins in earnest, underscoring how both teams are already deeply invested in shaping the jury long before opening statements are heard.

In a recent interview with Chris Hansen, attorney Tony Buzbee discussed the extensive legal actions against music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs. Buzbee revealed that his firm is representing over 120 individuals alleging sexual assault, exploitation, and abuse by Combs and other defendants. These cases span more than 25 years and include incidents involving minors, with some victims as young as nine years old. Buzbee emphasized the courage of these individuals in coming forward and noted that the allegations encompass a range of serious offenses, including rape and the use of controlled substances to incapacitate victims.

The interview also highlighted the broader implications of these lawsuits. Buzbee indicated that the legal actions aim not only to hold Combs accountable but also to expose other powerful individuals and entities that may have enabled or benefited from the alleged misconduct. He mentioned that the lawsuits could involve various defendants, including corporate entities such as banks, pharmaceutical companies, and hotels. Buzbee stressed the importance of a thorough investigation to ensure that all responsible parties are identified and held accountable.

(commercial at 15:27)

to contact me:

[email protected]

Sean "Diddy" Combs was recently arrested on serious charges including sex trafficking, racketeering, and conspiracy, linked to his infamous "Freak Off" parties. According to the federal indictment, these parties involved transporting commercial sex workers across state lines and coercing victims into sexual acts, often under the influence of drugs. These events were reportedly elaborate, sometimes lasting several days, and involved extreme physical exertion and substance abuse, with some victims requiring IV fluids afterward. Diddy allegedly directed and recorded many of these acts without the knowledge of the participants.

The fallout from these allegations has placed a spotlight on various high-profile individuals who have been associated with Diddy over the years. Some celebrities and politicians are now facing scrutiny for their connections to him. Among those mentioned are Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump, who have all interacted with or publicly supported Diddy at different points in his career. Additionally, celebrities like Jennifer Lopez and Joe Budden have been linked to these parties, with some reports suggesting they may be subpoenaed for further testimony.

While Diddy has denied the charges and is preparing to fight the case, the scandal is already having significant consequences in the entertainment and political worlds. The investigation continues to unfold, with more details likely to emerge about the extent of his connections and the involvement of others in his circle​.

(commercial at 8:38)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Did Diddy use the rich and famous to hide in plain sight? Star enjoyed A-list endorsements from Obama to Oprah Winfrey and British royals | Daily Mail Online

Sean "Diddy" Combs was recently arrested on serious charges including sex trafficking, racketeering, and conspiracy, linked to his infamous "Freak Off" parties. According to the federal indictment, these parties involved transporting commercial sex workers across state lines and coercing victims into sexual acts, often under the influence of drugs. These events were reportedly elaborate, sometimes lasting several days, and involved extreme physical exertion and substance abuse, with some victims requiring IV fluids afterward. Diddy allegedly directed and recorded many of these acts without the knowledge of the participants.

The fallout from these allegations has placed a spotlight on various high-profile individuals who have been associated with Diddy over the years. Some celebrities and politicians are now facing scrutiny for their connections to him. Among those mentioned are Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump, who have all interacted with or publicly supported Diddy at different points in his career. Additionally, celebrities like Jennifer Lopez and Joe Budden have been linked to these parties, with some reports suggesting they may be subpoenaed for further testimony.

While Diddy has denied the charges and is preparing to fight the case, the scandal is already having significant consequences in the entertainment and political worlds. The investigation continues to unfold, with more details likely to emerge about the extent of his connections and the involvement of others in his circle​.

(commercial at 8:38)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Did Diddy use the rich and famous to hide in plain sight? Star enjoyed A-list endorsements from Obama to Oprah Winfrey and British royals | Daily Mail Online