In the amended complaint filed in Joseph Rose v. Sean Combs et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-07974-JMF, plaintiff Joseph Rose brings a civil action against Sean Combs and various affiliated entities, including Daddy’s House Recordings, Combs Global (formerly Combs Enterprises), multiple Bad Boy corporate entities, and unnamed organizational and individual defendants. The plaintiff alleges a range of misconduct tied to Combs and his corporate network, seeking to hold them liable for damages stemming from what appears to be a pattern of unlawful, abusive, or otherwise harmful conduct.

The complaint, which includes a demand for a jury trial, reflects an effort by Rose to pierce the corporate veil and hold Combs and his business empire accountable through civil litigation. By naming multiple corporate shells and unidentified individuals and organizations, the plaintiff signals an intent to expose a broader network potentially involved in or facilitating the alleged wrongdoing. The lawsuit seeks legal redress under federal jurisdiction and continues a growing list of civil claims now surrounding Combs and his business operations.


to contact me:

[email protected]




source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.630243.64.0.pdf

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone’s Notes app.

The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane’s testimony.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdf

In this filing, Sean Combs opposes the government’s motion seeking permission to withhold the identities of certain witnesses in the civil RICO case, arguing that such secrecy is unjustified and prejudicial. Combs’ legal team contends that the government’s vague claims of witness safety concerns lack any factual foundation or evidence of real threats from Combs or his legal team. They argue that the government's request to conceal witness identities, even during the early stages of discovery, violates basic principles of due process and fairness, as it would prevent Combs from meaningfully preparing his defense and testing the credibility of key accusers.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.248.0_1.pdf

Sara Rivers, formerly known as Sara Stokes from MTV’s Making the Band 2 and a member of Da Band, filed a $60 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, battery, psychological abuse, and professional sabotage. Rivers claims that Combs subjected her to degrading treatment throughout her time on the reality series and beyond, including groping her without consent, making sexually explicit comments, and mocking her bulimia. She further alleges that Combs controlled contestants' food, sleep, and movement, orchestrated humiliating stunts like the infamous "cheesecake walk," and forced her into uncompensated labor under exploitative conditions. According to the complaint, Rivers was made to sleep in exposed, unsafe quarters with male co-stars and denied basic dignity and protection.


The lawsuit names more than two dozen other parties, including executives at Bad Boy, Universal Music Group, MTV, and even Combs's mother, asserting that they either enabled or failed to intervene in the abuse. Rivers accuses Combs of deliberately dismantling Da Band to assert dominance and retain control of her earnings, effectively sabotaging her career. She asserts that this behavior was not isolated but part of a systemic pattern of exploitation and intimidation that targeted young, vulnerable performers. Combs’s legal team has dismissed the suit as meritless and opportunistic, noting it was filed just before the deadline under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act. The case joins a growing list of lawsuits and criminal investigations currently surrounding Combs.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Sara cmplt

In a lawsuit filed in October 2024, a personal trainer, identified as "John Doe," accused Sean "Diddy" Combs of drugging and sexually assaulting him during an after-party at Combs' Los Angeles mansion in June 2022. The trainer alleged that upon arrival, he was asked to sign a nondisclosure agreement and was given a drink that caused him to feel disoriented and weak. He claimed that Combs led him to a room where multiple individuals, including celebrities, were engaged in sexual activities. The trainer asserted that Combs removed his pants and performed non-consensual oral sex on him, then directed him to perform similar acts on another male celebrity. He described feeling incapacitated and unable to resist, stating that he was "passed around like a party favor" for others' sexual gratification.


The lawsuit further alleged that the trainer experienced periods of unconsciousness during the assaults and later found himself outside his apartment without his shirt or phone, with no recollection of how he got there. He claimed that the incident led to severe emotional distress and financial losses. The lawsuit included a photograph of a container allegedly used by Combs or his associates to administer gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), a substance often linked to drug-facilitated sexual assault. Combs' legal team denied the allegations, labeling them as false and publicity-driven.



(commercial at 7:58)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.630243.1.0.pdf

In a lawsuit filed in October 2024, a personal trainer, identified as "John Doe," accused Sean "Diddy" Combs of drugging and sexually assaulting him during an after-party at Combs' Los Angeles mansion in June 2022. The trainer alleged that upon arrival, he was asked to sign a nondisclosure agreement and was given a drink that caused him to feel disoriented and weak. He claimed that Combs led him to a room where multiple individuals, including celebrities, were engaged in sexual activities. The trainer asserted that Combs removed his pants and performed non-consensual oral sex on him, then directed him to perform similar acts on another male celebrity. He described feeling incapacitated and unable to resist, stating that he was "passed around like a party favor" for others' sexual gratification.


The lawsuit further alleged that the trainer experienced periods of unconsciousness during the assaults and later found himself outside his apartment without his shirt or phone, with no recollection of how he got there. He claimed that the incident led to severe emotional distress and financial losses. The lawsuit included a photograph of a container allegedly used by Combs or his associates to administer gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), a substance often linked to drug-facilitated sexual assault. Combs' legal team denied the allegations, labeling them as false and publicity-driven.



(commercial at 7:58)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.630243.1.0.pdf

In a lawsuit filed in October 2024, a personal trainer, identified as "John Doe," accused Sean "Diddy" Combs of drugging and sexually assaulting him during an after-party at Combs' Los Angeles mansion in June 2022. The trainer alleged that upon arrival, he was asked to sign a nondisclosure agreement and was given a drink that caused him to feel disoriented and weak. He claimed that Combs led him to a room where multiple individuals, including celebrities, were engaged in sexual activities. The trainer asserted that Combs removed his pants and performed non-consensual oral sex on him, then directed him to perform similar acts on another male celebrity. He described feeling incapacitated and unable to resist, stating that he was "passed around like a party favor" for others' sexual gratification.


The lawsuit further alleged that the trainer experienced periods of unconsciousness during the assaults and later found himself outside his apartment without his shirt or phone, with no recollection of how he got there. He claimed that the incident led to severe emotional distress and financial losses. The lawsuit included a photograph of a container allegedly used by Combs or his associates to administer gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), a substance often linked to drug-facilitated sexual assault. Combs' legal team denied the allegations, labeling them as false and publicity-driven.



(commercial at 7:58)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.630243.1.0.pdf

A personal trainer, identified as John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging sexual assault and exploitation. The plaintiff claims that in 2018, during a training session at Combs' residence, Combs made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and suggestive remarks. Despite Doe's objections, Combs allegedly persisted, leading to an assault that caused significant emotional and psychological distress.

The lawsuit further alleges that Combs leveraged his celebrity status and influence to intimidate Doe into silence, threatening to ruin his professional reputation if he disclosed the incident. This power dynamic, the suit claims, prevented Doe from coming forward sooner. The legal action seeks damages for the alleged assault, emotional suffering, and the impact on Doe's career. Combs' legal team has categorically denied these allegations, describing them as baseless attempts to damage his reputation.



(commercial at 9:22)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Diddy drugged personal trainer and passed him around 'like a party favor' to celeb pals, latest horror lawsuit claims | The Sun

Attorney Tony Buzbee has revealed that numerous A-list celebrities are taking steps to distance themselves from Sean "Diddy" Combs following his arrest on sex trafficking and racketeering charges. According to Buzbee, many of these celebrities have been scrubbing their social media accounts in an attempt to erase any association with Diddy, particularly as more victims come forward with allegations related to his notorious parties. Buzbee suggested that these efforts are likely intended to avoid public scrutiny and potential legal exposure.


Buzbee further implied that some of these high-profile figures may have been aware of or even participated in illegal activities at Diddy's parties. He hinted that additional legal actions could involve more prominent names in the entertainment industry. The attorney is meticulously vetting the claims to ensure all relevant individuals are held accountable, warning that this case could implicate a broader network of individuals beyond Diddy himself. The ongoing legal battle may ultimately reveal further complicity among his celebrity circle.

(commercial at 9:23)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Lawyer for 'Diddy' accuser has 'no doubt' celebrity friends are 'scrubbing' social media after indictment | Fox News

In United States v. Combs, the Government responds to the defendant’s motion to strike portions of Mr. Mescudi’s testimony. The defendant contends that certain parts of Mescudi’s testimony should be excluded from the trial, asserting that they are irrelevant or prejudicial. The Government argues that Mescudi’s testimony is both relevant and integral to its case, and it should not be excluded. They emphasize that Mescudi's statements provide important context and details that directly relate to the charges and help to establish key aspects of the prosecution’s narrative.


Additionally, the Government identifies disputed evidentiary issues regarding the upcoming testimony of Deonte Nash and Mia. The defense has raised objections about the admissibility of certain aspects of their testimonies, questioning their relevance and the potential for bias. The Government contends that both witnesses are critical to the case and their testimonies should be allowed to stand, as they provide essential evidence regarding the defendant’s actions. The Government’s position is that any objections to their testimony should be rejected, as it aligns with the facts and is necessary for proving the charges.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.406.0.pdf