<p>This week's podcast covers <em>Ramos v. Louisiana,</em> in which a DEEPLY DIVIDED COURT provides multiple opinions on whether the Fourteenth Amendment requires States to have unanimous jury verdicts. Law starts at (04:14).</p>

This week's podcast covers Ramos v. Louisiana, in which a DEEPLY DIVIDED COURT provides multiple opinions on whether the Fourteenth Amendment requires States to have unanimous jury verdicts. Law starts at (04:14).

Nine Angry Justices

Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys.  Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting.  This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only.  If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately

Comedy

Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately

Share Nine Angry Justices

Sign up to save your podcasts

Nine Angry Justices

Nine Angry Justices

More shows like The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court

Freakonomics Radio

Political Gabfest

Left, Right & Center

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

Here & Now Anytime

Bloomberg Law

We the People

Opening Arguments

Texas Standard

Civics 101

Pitchfork Economics with Nick Hanauer

Strict Scrutiny

The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie

Amarica's Constitution

Divided Argument