
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In October 2013, Scotty Weingart was on the show and suggested that closed chest CPR has no role in traumatic cardiac arrest. It made sense because, after all, the things that cause a traumatic arrest won't be helped by closed chest compressions. Tension pneumothorax, pericardial tamponade, hypovolemia from exsanguination - pushing on the chest isn't going to reverse any of those. But where is the evidence to support that claim? Don't we always compress the chest when the heart has stopped?
There is, unfortunately, a dearth of data on this topic. Swami and I scoured the known literature and here's what we found...
Lockey DJ et al. Development of a simple algorithm to guide the effective management of traumatic cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2013; 84: 738-42.
The authors' algorithm states that in all traumatic arrests, you should look for a penetrating injury to the chest or epigastrium. If you find one, crack the chest ASAP.
If you don’t see a penetrating injury, consider a medical cause for the arrest.
There are a few key procedures in trauma arrest and the study recommends using the HOT mnemonic.
If these three things are addressed and there’s no ROSC, you should consider stopping resuscitation. This simple list emphasizes a systematic approach so that you open the chest when it’s indicated without thinking about it too much.
Leis CC et al. Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Should Advanced Life Support Be Initiated? Acute Care Surgery 2013; 74: 634-8.
Advanced life support in this article means advanced procedures, not ACLS and CPR. The authors argue that we should resuscitate patients in traumatic arrest stating that 49.1% attain ROSC and 6.6% have a good neurologic outcome, including 23.1% of children.
ALS here included IV fluids, intubation, chest tube insertion, pericardiocentesis and FAST in the field. There was no mention of chest compressions.
Bottom Line: The question as to whether or not closed chest CPR in traumatic cardiac arrest has not been well studied. In the literature we found, chest compressions were rarely mentioned (if at all). Logistically, compressions can get in the way of life saving procedures and haven't been shown to help (nor have they been shown not to help). Considering the pathophysiology of traumatic arrest, compressions don’t make a lot of sense in the emergency department, since pumping on a closed chest in a patient with no volume (hemorrhagic shock), a hole (pericardial effusion), or obstructed outflow (tension PTX) isn’t going to help.
Find out more and register for ATLANTIS CME
Essentials of Emergency Medicine
SMACC 2015
By Rob Orman, MD4.9
421421 ratings
In October 2013, Scotty Weingart was on the show and suggested that closed chest CPR has no role in traumatic cardiac arrest. It made sense because, after all, the things that cause a traumatic arrest won't be helped by closed chest compressions. Tension pneumothorax, pericardial tamponade, hypovolemia from exsanguination - pushing on the chest isn't going to reverse any of those. But where is the evidence to support that claim? Don't we always compress the chest when the heart has stopped?
There is, unfortunately, a dearth of data on this topic. Swami and I scoured the known literature and here's what we found...
Lockey DJ et al. Development of a simple algorithm to guide the effective management of traumatic cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2013; 84: 738-42.
The authors' algorithm states that in all traumatic arrests, you should look for a penetrating injury to the chest or epigastrium. If you find one, crack the chest ASAP.
If you don’t see a penetrating injury, consider a medical cause for the arrest.
There are a few key procedures in trauma arrest and the study recommends using the HOT mnemonic.
If these three things are addressed and there’s no ROSC, you should consider stopping resuscitation. This simple list emphasizes a systematic approach so that you open the chest when it’s indicated without thinking about it too much.
Leis CC et al. Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Should Advanced Life Support Be Initiated? Acute Care Surgery 2013; 74: 634-8.
Advanced life support in this article means advanced procedures, not ACLS and CPR. The authors argue that we should resuscitate patients in traumatic arrest stating that 49.1% attain ROSC and 6.6% have a good neurologic outcome, including 23.1% of children.
ALS here included IV fluids, intubation, chest tube insertion, pericardiocentesis and FAST in the field. There was no mention of chest compressions.
Bottom Line: The question as to whether or not closed chest CPR in traumatic cardiac arrest has not been well studied. In the literature we found, chest compressions were rarely mentioned (if at all). Logistically, compressions can get in the way of life saving procedures and haven't been shown to help (nor have they been shown not to help). Considering the pathophysiology of traumatic arrest, compressions don’t make a lot of sense in the emergency department, since pumping on a closed chest in a patient with no volume (hemorrhagic shock), a hole (pericardial effusion), or obstructed outflow (tension PTX) isn’t going to help.
Find out more and register for ATLANTIS CME
Essentials of Emergency Medicine
SMACC 2015

1,866 Listeners

544 Listeners

698 Listeners

258 Listeners

108 Listeners

812 Listeners

3,347 Listeners

259 Listeners

1,146 Listeners

697 Listeners

515 Listeners

247 Listeners

258 Listeners

374 Listeners

269 Listeners