Share One God Report
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
By William Schlegel
4.8
5757 ratings
The podcast currently has 125 episodes available.
PART 2
What if John 1:3 is translated as "all happened through him, and without him nothing happened. That which happened (came to be) in him was life, and the life was the light of men"?
Compare the Literal Standard Version and Young's Literal Translation.
What if John 1:3 is translated as "all happened through him, and without him nothing happened" (compare the literal translations: the Literal Standard Version and Young's Literal Translation)?
Stories of how former Trinitarians, Atheists and Jehovah’s
Book
#biblicalunitarian, #bible, #Jesus, #countthecost,
Who is the Servant described in Isaiah 53? Israel? Jesus Christ? Someone else? Whoever the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53 is, it is clear that the Servant is NOT God.
The servant of Isaiah 53 is the Servant of God.
#isaiah53, #michaelbrown, #toviahSinger, #benshapiro, #bible, #sufferingservant, #Jesus
Dr. Tim Mackie appeared on the Transfiguration Podcast,
0:00 Intro: Dr. Mackie’s search: How are Trinitarian expressions of God derived from the Bible?
02:20 Definition: What is the Trinity. Confusion between God as the Father alone, Trinitarianism, and Modalism. How many persons/selves is God?
08:03 Partial Knowledge. “Our knowledge of God will always be partial. The Trinity is a mystery.”
14:27 Progressive Revelation “Our knowledge of how many persons God is, was revealed progressively.”
24:00 Agency: the agent (one sent) of the sender is considered to legally be the presence of the sender.
26:14 How and When was the Trinity revealed? A couple New Testament references that supposedly hint that “Jesus is God”. Do Jesus’ miracles prove Jesus is
37:00 Any common ground between One-God-the-Father believers, and Trinitarians? Different narratives.
40:41 A thank you and challenge to Dr. Mackie.
Resources:
Transfigured Interview: Tim Mackie - The Trinity, Hermeneutics & Doctrinal Development
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyCqhMDudYU&t=1561s
Is the Trinity in the Bible? If So, Where?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POVaZX3urdc
How and When was the Trinity Revealed?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HaqhjicWv8
My Lord and My God, Trinitarians Get it Wrong, John 20:28
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxYp4n52P8Q
Text: https://landandbible.blogspot.com/2019/12/my-lord-and-my-god-trinitarians-get-it.html
One God Report Podcast:
Land and Bible blog (Bill Schlegel)
https://landandbible.blogspot.com/
1. The claim is non-biblical, philosophical speculation. This claim is not something argued or presented in the Bible.
2. The Bible says exactly the opposite. The Bible says that Jesus had to be a man, a human being, not just a
Problems: The claim that Jesus had to be God to atone for
And that penalty is death. The claim is that instead of me, somebody else had to die for my sin. My sin is worthy of death, so, unless someone pays the death penalty, I will die. If someone else pays the penalty, then I don’t have to die. My sin is worthy of death, so that’s why a death is required for justice. Someone had to pay the death penalty – so instead of me, Jesus, who had to be
Now again, this is not a biblical claim. It is man’s philosophical speculation. And, I think that we can see that the Bible says something quite the opposite.
But even from a human or philosophical aspect, I think most people, if we think about it a little bit, can see the serious, non-biblical, theological, philosophical dead ends and inconsistencies with the claim.
Let’s say I murder someone. The biblical penalty for murder is death. I deserve death. I’ve been convicted in a court of law by jurors and a judge and sentenced to
So, the judge says, “OK, the penalty for this crime is death. If you are willing to pay the penalty, come on over here. Executioners, take the handcuffs off Bill and
Nope.
For the “Jesus must be God to pay for sin” folks there is another step in their philosophical, non-biblical speculation. They start thinking: well, maybe
But our situation is not just one person for one person. The deity of Christ philosopher thinks, “Whoa, to pay the penalty for all sinners, for millions and billions of sinners, Jesus would have to be eternal God to be enough to do that”.
God died (again, in direct contradiction to the Scriptures). In the Bible God is immortal and does not die. Well, not all of God died. Only one person of God died. So God did but God did not die.
“And death is only the separation of the soul from the body. One person of God, or the soul/spirit of that one person, had taken on a human nature. So the spirit
Some comments:
1. A person-less human nature (whatever
Resources:
Jesus had to be a “Mere” Man
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtQXFuOXBaA
"Jesus had to be God to atone for our sins." Really? Got a Scripture for that?
https://landandbible.blogspot.com/2019/01/jesus-had-to-be-god-to-atone-for-our.html
Book: Atonement and Reconciliation:
https://www.amazon.com/Atonement-Reconciliation-contrasted-Substitutionary-Atonement/dp/B0CHDKFWCC
Most scholars say the Gospels were not written until the mid AD 60s. Is that right?
This podcast describes why they think that, and gives suggestions as to why the Gospels may have been written
For full text, see here: https://landandbible.blogspot.com/2024/05/when-were-gospels-written-historical.html
Resources:
Link to Fuel Youth Camp Registration:
Podcast describing Fuel Youth Camp: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7VPCLbVDD0
UCA Conference Registration:
JAT Robinson, Redating the New Testament.
Some Biblical Unitarians (believers in the One God, the
Trinitarian “diety-of-Christ” and “Arian” believers likewise don’t see the human person, the human being Jesus of Nazareth in the first verses of John’s Gospel. They see only a “divine being/person who became flesh” – but this podcast is not directed toward them. They have bigger problems.
This podcast should challenge believers in One God, the Father, to see that the “personified plan, purpose, wisdom” interpretation of John’s Prologue falls short.
I asked fourteen One God, the Father believers who have lectured or written about their abstract personification interpretation of John’s Prologue, this question:
“At what place in John 1 do you first see the man Christ Jesus of Nazareth or his ministry, either metaphorically or literally, being the subject?“
Their answers should be enlightening.
Other resources mentioned in this podcast:
https://www.amazon.com/John-1-1-18-Andrew-Perry/dp/0993444083
https://www.academia.edu/42755430/John_1_1_18_A_Socinian_Approach
Whittaker, H.A. Studies in the Gospels
https://www.christadelphianbooks.com/detail/1738
Podcast: John 1 is NOT Genesis 1 (8+1 Evidences)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFv33RbrJfQ
Tips on Talking with Trinitarians about John 1
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUqWXumvcp5oTh8KhdYpIGhrH11AXnxtM
For those who come to understand and believe that the God of the Bible is the Father alone (John 17:3, 1 Cor. 8:6) and that Jesus is God's human Messiah, the Christ, the Son of God --- you will be condemned by many religious leaders and even family and friends.
This podcast gives some examples :).
Other resources:
Bill Schlegel Youtube Channel
https://www.youtube.com/@billschlegel1
Blog
https://landandbible.blogspot.com/
Lecture: Denying Christ: "Jesus is God" Denies that Jesus is the Christ
https://youtu.be/mQMBh-Hhiw4
The podcast currently has 125 episodes available.
25,082 Listeners
2,022 Listeners
120 Listeners
837 Listeners
138 Listeners
33,666 Listeners
75 Listeners
2,567 Listeners
40 Listeners
7,657 Listeners
7 Listeners
500 Listeners
54 Listeners
12 Listeners
13,223 Listeners